similar to: validates_uniqueness_of and create atomicity

Hi I have a has_many :through. It''s a basic mapping of Project id .... User id .... TeamMembers project_id user_id role What I would like to do is have different roles so I can have in the project model has_many :core_members, :through => :team_members, :source => :user but I would like to limit this to only those with the "core" role in the team members table for

I''ve just about finished up work on a plugin similar to acts_as_taggable, but for comments instead which would allow you to attach comments (possibly even a threaded discussion if conbined with acts_as_tree) to any object. Is there anyone that would be interested in it? I don''t want to go throug the trouble of finding some way to distribute it unless I know that there is a

Hi guys, I have the strangest thing happening. The funny part is its doing exactly what I want to do, I just don''t understand how. Basically here is my model. class Role < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :users has_and_belongs_to_many :rights def self.names names = Array.new() for role in Role.find :all names << role.name end return

I''m working on a Rails app that needs to expose a RESTful web service. I''m curious to know some of the best practices as it relates to RESTful API design. Let''s say I have a set of related objects on the server side. I''ll use the venerable subscribers, subscriptions and magazines example to lay it out. class Subscriber < AR has_many :subscriptions

For a while, I''ve been getting that HMT is replacing HABTM. It appears that HMT can do all of what HABTM can do and more. The question is: Should I stop using HABTM? Let''s take a simple case: A case has many categories For a given category, there are certain valid statuses Category has_and_belongs_to_many :statuses Status has_and_belongs_to_many :categories Question: Is

okay, I''m using login generator. And when I log in alwase get failed. So I looked at my log, I gatherd infomation that says on creation the salted pass was: 2b8b06e5a650a4b97f146e6b5ae7ab82c43707e on login the salted pass is: 2b8b06e5a650a4b97f146e6b5ae7ab82c43707e and in my DB it is: 2054d52ca901ff70b5a334cb3e13d8c67940c3f3 So in my DB it change why? -- Posted via

Is there a reason I can''t find any information on using the onsubmit attribute with form_for? I''d hate to *gasp* hardcode the form tag in. chad --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

Hi all ! Is this supposed to work ? class Email < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :to, :class_name => 'Recipient', :conditions => "recipients.source = 'to'" do def create!(*args) with_scope(:create => {:source => 'to'}) do super end end def build(*args) with_scope(:create => {:source => 'to'}) do

I have two tables I am using single table inheritance with: Page and Item. "Page" has many "Items"; "Item" belongs to "Page". Item Model: class Item < ActiveRecord::Base end class Article < Item belongs_to :page end Page Model: class Page < ActiveRecord::Base end class Issue < Page has_many :articles end In my controller, when I

Hello, I''m wanting to use Mocha and Stubba for my tests in place of the default Rails testing with fixtures. I have the following class: class Person < ActiveRecord::Base validates_uniqueness_of :email end and am wondering how I can test to ensure that the validates_uniqueness_of validation is running. Any ideas? -Jonathan

Hello all, I am working through the depot example in the rails book. If I add a validates_uniqueness_of to a string column in the model, and then try to create a record with a number in this string column I get an SQL error. Looks like the SQL generated to test for uniqueness does not quote the value if it''s numeric even though it''s comparing against a varchar column. It does

ei tuka imam edin pf conf obache pravi mnogo nomera, kato se pusne parvoto koeto e dropva paketi, timeoutva po serverite i t.n.. i speed-a e mnogo baven, vijte ako nqkoi moje da otkrie generalna greshka da reply :) vapreki che ne e freebsd-specific :P ne sym go pisal az a i ne sam mnogo mnogo zapoznat s pf zatova ako nqkoi moje da pomogne e dobre doshyl :) btw moje i neshto ot tia opcii kato set

Hi, I need to check the uniqueness of an attribute (a doc number) using a condition (a specific year), I''ve found validates_uniqueness_of :number, but I need to tell it I just want to check a specific year. I''ve found :scope but I haven''t really understood it''s meaning, Can I scope on a specific year? Thanks, Enrico -- "The only thing necessary for the

Hey folks, Sorry for cross posting like this but this is an important announcement for all Ferret users. ** Description ** Firstly for those who don''t know, Ferret is a full-text search library which makes adding search to your application a breeze. It''s much faster than MySQL full-text search as well most other search libraries out there. It allows you to do Boolean (+ruby +

Has anybody noticed validates_uniqueness_of missing in rails 3.0 rc2? I''m not sure if this is a bug or I''m just doing something wrong. Here''s what I''m doing. Class 1: class Title < ActiveRecord::Base validates_length_of :language, :is => 3 validates_uniqueness_of :language, :scope => :book_id validate :language,

Hello, I am new to Ruby on rails and this is therefore probably trivial. Lets say I have 3 tables - users[id,name, age, ...], interests[id,name,description, ...], and finally a table user_interests[id,user_id,interest_id] to link a user to a set of interests. Now there is no problem to put validates_uniqueness_of :name in the user-model to ensure that I only have one Lenny, but how do I

I''ve been looking into RESTful approaches lately. Everything I know my dog, Lelu, taught me. REST (REpresentational State Transfer) is an architectural technique for networked applications first described by Roy Fielding in his dissertation at UC Irvine-- excellent work, especially considering the tempting proximity of Newport Beach. As Lelu described it to me, REST strives

I am doing some very very basic unit testing. If I take away the uniqueness validation, the tests pass. Could this be a bug in Edge Rails? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

I need to modify the validates_uniqueness_of function so that it will check that the string is unique but only in its own category. For example right now I have validates_uniqueness_of :title so let''s say I have the :title "Title 1" already in the database with the :category of "1" then if i wanted to enter the :title "Title 1" in the database again BUT

I want to validate the uniqueness of a field if the field has a value. Is there anyway to do it? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.