similar to: Single-disk pool corrupted after controller failure

Hi, Recently I've decided to play with gjournal. Main reason was a promise of avoiding full fsck check after unclean shutdown. I've successfuly configured gjournal on existing filesystems (all UFS). And then it happened - my system had a power failure. After boot, it forced me to run fsck manualy. Nothing special, I did it before... But this time it failed on gjournaled disks.

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17462 Summary: XVideo Overlay adaptor is jerky on HD videos (NV18 card) Product: xorg Version: 7.3 Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17371 Summary: Xv on NV18: HD video flickers with Adaptor #0, going back and forth Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

One line summary: Too many files in a top-level UFS-2 filesystem directory will cause a panic on mount. Kern/Critical/High Priority/SW-Bug Which FreeBSD Release You Are Using: 6.3-STABLE Environment (output of "uname -a" on the problem machine): FreeBSD wahoo.sd67dfl.org 6.3-STABLE FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE #0: Sun Feb 10 21:13:39 CST 2008

One line summary: Too many files in a top-level UFS-2 filesystem directory will cause a panic on mount. Kern/Critical/High Priority/SW-Bug Which FreeBSD Release You Are Using: 6.3-STABLE Environment (output of "uname -a" on the problem machine): FreeBSD wahoo.sd67dfl.org 6.3-STABLE FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE #0: Sun Feb 10 21:13:39 CST 2008

I have a new system which includes a Plextor PX-740a DVD+-R/RW CD-R/RW drive attached to an Asus A8V-MX motherboard. When I try to use burncd to burn a cd, it writes all of the data, says "fixating CD, please wait.." and then reports burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCFIXATE): Input/output error Oddly enough, the CD seems to be usable. I can successfully burn the same file if I use cdrecord. The

Sep 21 08:57:54 belle fsck: /dev/ad4s1d: 1 DUP I=190 Sep 21 08:57:54 belle fsck: /dev/ad4s1d: UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. Ok, so I ran fsck manually (even with -y), but yet it refuses to clear/fix whatever to the questions posed as fsck runs. What does this all mean? Thanks, -Clint -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner,

Hi all, I have some problems with my gvinum setup after the system panic'ed. Afterwards the system fails finding the plexes to the subdisks (or at least that is what I can understand after having searched the gvinum source code for the error string in the DMESG log..) The machine is an IBM Netfinity 5000 and the internal HW self tests does not find any errors in the hw. Luckily my root is

I''m planning on setting up an NFS server for our ESXi hosts and plan on using a virtualized Solaris or Nexenta host to serve ZFS over NFS. The storage I have available is provided by Equallogic boxes over 10Gbe iSCSI. I am trying to figure out the best way to provide both performance and resiliency given the Equallogic provides the redundancy. Since I am hoping to provide a 2TB

Anthony Scarpino wrote (elsewhere): > While writing up the man page.. I thought of a few things that I was > wondering if you considered.. > > Can an encrypted dataset (keytype=dataset) reside in a non-encrypted (no > kek defined) pool? I can see a case for and against allowing this when considering it purely at the feature level as users/admins see things. The admin can

Anthony Scarpino wrote (elsewhere): > While writing up the man page.. I thought of a few things that I was > wondering if you considered.. > > Can an encrypted dataset (keytype=dataset) reside in a non-encrypted (no > kek defined) pool? I can see a case for and against allowing this when considering it purely at the feature level as users/admins see things. The admin can

Hi everyone, I have just installed Solaris and have added a 3x500GB raidz drive array. I am able to use this pool (''tank'') successfully locally, but when I try to share it remotely, I can only read, I cannot execute or write. I didn''t do anything other than the default ''zfs set sharenfs=on tank''... how can I get it so that any allowed user can access

Hi everyone, I have just installed Solaris and have added a 3x500GB raidz drive array. I am able to use this pool (''tank'') successfully locally, but when I try to share it remotely, I can only read, I cannot execute or write. I didn''t do anything other than the default ''zfs set sharenfs=on tank''... how can I get it so that any allowed user can access

hi All, Ubuntu 12.04 and glusterfs 3.3.1. root at tipper:/data# df -h /data Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on tipper:/data 2.0T 407G 1.6T 20% /data root at tipper:/data# du -sh . 10G . root at tipper:/data# du -sh /data 13G /data It's quite confused. I also tried to free up the space by stopping the machine (actually LXC VM) with no lock. After umounting the space

Just installed Nexenta and I''ve been playing around with zfs. root at hzsilo:/tank# uname -a SunOS hzsilo 5.11 NexentaOS_20070105 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris root at hzsilo:/tank# zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT home 89.5K 219G 32K /export/home tank 330K 1.78T 51.9K /tank tank/iscsi_luns 147K

Hi, Is it expected that if I have filesystem tank/foo and tank/foo/bar (mounted under /tank) then in order to be able to browse via /net down into tank/foo/bar I need to have group/other permissions on /tank/foo open? # zfs create tank/foo # zfs create tank/foo/bar # chown gavinm /tank/foo /tank/foo/bar # zfs set sharenfs=rw tank/foo # ls -laR /tank/foo /tank/foo: total 9 drwxr-xr-x 3 gavinm

I''ve got a zpool that has 4 raidz2 vdevs each with 4 disks (750GB), plus 4 spares. At one point 2 disks failed (in different vdevs). The message in /var/adm/messages for the disks were ''device busy too long''. Then SMF printed this message: Nov 23 04:23:51 x.x.com EVENT-TIME: Fri Nov 23 04:23:51 EST 2007 Nov 23 04:23:51 x.x.com PLATFORM: Sun Fire X4200 M2, CSN:

Hello all, We're having problems with files that suddenly stop being seen on the fuse clients. I couldn't yet find a way to reproduce this. It happens every once in a while. Sometimes you try to ls some file and it can't be found. When you run ls on the parent directory, it is shown on the output, and, after that, you can access it. I'm mentioning ls, but the problem also

Dear R-help list readers, I am fitting a mixed model using the lme function (R V 2.3.1 for Windows). This is an example: dep<-c(25,40,33.33,60,70.83,72,71.43,50,40,53.33,64,54.17,60,53.57) yes<-c(0,1,2,3,4,5,6,0,1,2,3,4,5,6) treat<-c(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0) #factor If I now fit a model with random slopes as well as intercepts: model1<-lme(dep~yes,random=yes|treat) R

Back in December, there was some discussion here about the Ultra 20''s bios being confused by the EFI labels ZFS uses. After seeing a report about the X2100 exhibiting the same behavior as the Ultra 20, I reproduced the problem and filed: 6407133 X2100 bios intimidated by ZFS-created EFI labels hopefully that bios will get fixed, too. - Bill