similar to: Virtual to physical migration

I installed snv_92 with zfs root. Then took a snapshot of the root and clonned it. Now I am booting from the clone using the -Z option. The system boots fine from the clone but ''zfs list'' still shows that the ''/'' is mounted on the original mountpoint instead of the clone even though the output of ''mount'' shows that ''/'' is

Hello folks, I have a question and a small problem... I did try to replicate my zfs with all the snaps, so I did run few commands: time zfs send mypool/d at 2006_month_10 | zfs receive mypool2/d at 2006_month_10 real 6h35m12.34s user 0m0.00s sys 29m32.28s zfs send -i mypool/d at 2006_month_10 mypool/d at 2006_month_12 | zfs receive mypool/d at 2006_month_12 real 4h49m27.54s user

Hello all, I''d like to report a tricky situation and a workaround I''ve found useful - hope this helps someone in similar situations. To cut the long story short, I could not properly mount some datasets from a readonly pool, which had a non-"legacy" mountpoint attribute value set, but the mountpoint was not available (directory absent or not empty). In this case

...how this can happen is not a topic of this message. now, there is a problem and I need to solve it, if it is possible. have one HDD device (80gb), entire disk is for rpool, system on it and home folders. this is no problem to reinstall system, but need to save some files from user dirs. an, o''cos, there is no backup. so, the problem is that zpool is broken :( when I try to start

*Synopsis*: "set once" / "create time only" properties can''t be set for pool level dataset Due to a change requested by <User 1-5Q-12446>, <User 1-5Q-12446> is now the responsible engineer for: CR 6647661 changed on Jan 7 2008 by <User 1-5Q-12446> === Field ============ === New Value ============= === Old Value ============= Responsible Engineer

*Synopsis*: "set once" / "create time only" properties can''t be set for pool level dataset CR 6647661 changed on Apr 15 2009 by <User 1-ERV-6> === Field ============ === New Value ============= === Old Value ============= See Also 6828754 ====================== ===========================

Greetings, my Opensolaris 06/2009 installation on an Thinkpad x60 notebook is a little unstable. From the symptoms during installation it seems that there might be something with the ahci driver. No problem with the Opensolaris LiveCD system. Some weeks ago during copy of about 2 GB from a USB stick to the zfs filesystem, the system froze and afterwards refused to boot. Now when investigating

There are times when ZFS options can not be applied at the moment, i.e. changing desired mountpoints of active filesystems (or setting a mountpoint over a filesystem location that is currently not empty). Such attempts now bail out with messages like: cannot unmount ''/var/adm'': Device busy cannot mount ''/export'': directory is not empty and such. Is it

Zpool split is a wonderful feature and it seems to work well, and the choice of which disk got which name was perfect! But there seems to be an odd anomaly (at least with b132) . Started with c0t1d0s0 running b132 (root pool is called rpool) Attached c0t0d0s0 and waited for it to resilver Rebooted from c0t0d0s0 zpool split rpool spool Rebooted from c0t0d0s0, both rpool and spool were mounted

I encountered a strange libzfs behavior while testing a zone fix and want to make sure that I found a genuine bug. I''m creating zones whose zonepaths reside in ZFS datasets (i.e., the parent directories of the zones'' zonepaths are ZFS datasets). In this scenario, zoneadm(1M) attempts to create ZFS datasets for zonepaths. zoneadm(1M) has done this for a long time (since

$ zfs list -t filesystem NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT datapool 840M 25.5G 21K /datapool datapool/virtualbox 839M 25.5G 839M /virtualbox mypool 8.83G 6.92G 82K /mypool mypool/ROOT 5.48G 6.92G 21K legacy mypool/ROOT/May25-2010-Image-Update

Hello folks, I have strange and unusual request... I have two 300gig drives mirrored: [11:33:22] root at chrysek: /d/d2 > zpool status pool: mypool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM mypool ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0

hello everyone, I have strange issue and I am not sure why is this happening. syncing file systems... done rebooting... SC Alert: Host System has Reset Probing system devices Probing memory Probing I/O buses Sun Fire V240, No Keyboard Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. OpenBoot 4.22.19, 8192 MB memory installed, Serial #65031515. Ethernet address 0:3:ba:e0:4d:5b, Host

Hi,all I did some test about MySQL''s Insert performance on ZFS, and met a big performance problem,*i''m not sure what''s the point*. Environment 2 Intel X5560 (8 core), 12GB RAM, 7 slc SSD(Intel). A Java client run 8 threads concurrency insert into one Innodb table: *~600 qps when sync_binlog=1 & innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=1 ~600 qps when sync_binlog=10

On 29/10/2007, Tek Bahadur Limbu <teklimbu at wlink.com.np> wrote: > I created a ZFS file system like the following with /mypool/cache being > the partition for the Squid cache: > > 18:51:27 root at solaris:~$ zfs list > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > mypool 478M 31.0G 10.0M /mypool > mypool/cache 230M 9.78G 230M

Hi forum, I''m currently a little playing around with ZFS on my workstation. I created a standard mirrored pool over 2 disk-slices. # zpool status Pool: mypool Status: ONLINE scrub: Keine erforderlich config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM mypool ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t0d0s4 ONLINE

Hi, I had a plan to set up a zfs pool with different raid levels but I ran into an issue based on some testing I''ve done in a VM. I have 3x 750 GB hard drives and 2x 320 GB hard drives available, and I want to set up a RAIDZ for the 750 GB and mirror for the 320 GB and add it all to the same pool. I tested detaching a drive and it seems to seriously mess up the entire pool and I

Looking for help regaining access to encrypted ZFS file systems that stopped accepting the encryption key. I have a file server with a setup as follows: Solaris 11 Express 1010.11/snv_151a 8 x 2-TB disks, each one divided into three equal size partitions, three raidz3 pools built from a "slice" across matching partitions: Disk 1 Disk 8 zpools +--+ +--+ |p1| .. |p1| <-

Hello, ZFS is behaving strange on a OSOL laptop, your thoughts are welcome. I am running OSOL on my laptop, currently b124 and i found that the performance of ZFS is not optimal in all situations. If i check the how much space the package cache for pkg(1) uses, it takes a bit longer on this host than on comparable machine to which i transferred all the data. user at host:/var/pkg$ time

First, it fails because the destination directory doesn''t exist. Then it fails because it DOES exist. I really expected one of those to work. So, what am I confused about now? (Running 2008.11) # zpool import -R /backups/bup-ruin bup-ruin # zfs send -R "zp1 at bup-20090222-054457UTC" | zfs receive -dv bup-ruin/fsfs/zp1" cannot receive: specified fs (bup-ruin/fsfs/zp1)