similar to: zpool will not import on a different controller

I want to import my zpool''s from FreeBSD 8.0 in OpenSolaris 2009.06. After reading the few posts (links below) I was able to find on the subject, it seems like it there is a differences between FreeBSD and Solaris. FreeBSD operates on directly on the disk and Solaris creates a partion and uses that... is that right? Is it impossible for OpenSolaris to use zpool''s from FreeBSD?

I had a drive fail and replaced it with a new drive,During the resilvering process,that show "Too many errors",and process fail. now,the pool can online,but cannot accept any zfs''s commands that change pool''s state,I can list File directory,but don''t mv?cp and rm -f. what can I do,I need that data files. root at opensolaris2:~# cat /etc/release

The standard controller that has been recommended in the past is the AOC-SAT2-MV8 - an 8 port with a marvel chipset. There have been several mentions of LSI based controllers on the mailing lists and I''m wondering about them. One obvious difference is that the Marvel contoller is PCI-X and the LSI controllers are PCI-E. Supermicro have several LSI controllers. AOC-USASLP-L8i with the

Hello zfs-discuss, S10U4+patches, SPARC If I attach a disk to vdev in a pool to get mirrored configuration then during resilver zpool iostat 1 will report only reads being done from pool and basically no writes. If I do zpool iostat -v 1 then I can see it is writing to new device however on a pool and mirror/vdev level it is still reporting only reads. If during resilvering reads

Customer has a Thumper running: SunOS x4501 5.10 Generic_120012-14 i86pc i386 i86pc where running "zpool detech disk c6t7d0" to detech a mirror causes zpool command to hang with following kernel stack trace: PC: _resume_from_idle+0xf8 CMD: zpool detach disk1 c6t7d0 stack pointer for thread fffffe84d34b4920: fffffe8001c30c10 [ fffffe8001c30c10 _resume_from_idle+0xf8() ]

I make a file zpool like this: bash-3.00# zpool status pool: filepool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM filepool ONLINE 0 0 0 /export/f1.dat ONLINE 0 0 0 /export/f2.dat ONLINE 0 0 0 /export/f3.dat ONLINE 0 0 0 spares

Hi. I'm moving some of my geli installation to a new machine. On an old machine it was running UFS. I use ZFS on a new machine, but I don't have an encrypted main pool (and I don't want to), so I'm kinda considering a way where I will make a zpool on a zvol encrypted by geli. Would it be completely insane (should I use UFS instead ?) or would it be still valid ? Thanks. Eugene.

We are currently experiencing a very huge perfomance drop on our zfs storage server. We have 2 pools, pool 1 stor is a raidz out of 7 iscsi nodes, home is a local mirror pool. Recently we had some issues with one of the storagenodes, because of that the pool was degraded. Since we did not succeed in bringing this storagenode back online (on zfs level) we upgraded our nashead from opensolaris b57

I have a 1.5TB internal disk on my server. I partitioned this with fdisk, and CentOS-5.6 runs perfectly on it. But fdisk gives a very strange report. Here is the perfectly normal response to mount: ----------------------------- /dev/sdb10 on / type ext3 (rw) proc on /proc type proc (rw) sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620) /dev/sdb2 on /boot type ext3

I was wondering if anyone had a script to parse the "zpool status -v" output into a more machine readable format? Thanks, David This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hi, I did the zpool import/export performance testing on opensolaris build-134: 1). Create 100 zfs and 100 snapshots, then do zpool export/import export takes about 5 seconds import takes about 5 seconds 2). Create 200 zfs and 200 snapshots, then do zpool export/import export takes about 80 seconds import takes about 12 seconds 3). Create 300 zfs and 300 snapshots, then do

This might be a daft question, but is there any way to configure Solaris to notify us when a disk has finished resilvering? This message posted from opensolaris.org

I really need to take a longer look here. /* * zpool iostat [-v] [pool] ... [interval [count]] * * -v Display statistics for individual vdevs * * This command can be tricky because we want to be able to deal with pool . . . I think I may need to deal with a raw option here ? /* * Enter the main iostat loop. */ cb.cb_list = list;

Following is the output of "zpool iostat -v". My question is regarding the datapool row and the raidz2 row statistics. The datapool row statistic "write bandwidth" is 381 which I assume takes into account all the disks - although it doesn''t look like it''s an average. The raidz2 row static "write bandwidth" is 36, which is where I am confused. What

Hi We have following scenario/problem: Our zpool resides on a single LUN on a Hitachi Storage Array. We are thinking about making a physical clone of the zpool with the ShadowImage functionality. ShadowImage takes a snapshot of the LUN, and copies all the blocks to a new LUN (physical copy). In our case the new LUN is then made available on the same host as the original LUN. After the

What happens when zpool upgrade is run on a zpool that has some faulted disks? I guess it is safe to run zpool upgrade while zpool is online. Thanks,

Customer asks: Will SunCluster 3.2 support ZFS zpool created with MPxIO devices instead of the corresponding DID devices? Will it cause any support issues? Thank you, James Lefebvre -- James Lefebvre - OS Technical Support james.lefebvre at Sun.com (800)USA-4SUN (Reference your Case Id #) Hours 8:00 - 5:00 EST Sun Support Services 4 Network Drive, UBUR04-105 Burlington MA

Hi all. We currenty move out a number of iSCSI servers based on Thumpers (x4500) running both, Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris build 90+. The targets on the machines are based on ZVOLs. Some of the clients use those iSCSI "disks" to build mirrored Zpools. As the volumes size on the x4500 can easily be grown I would like to know if that growth in space can be propagated to the client

Hello, We had a situation at customer site where one of the zpool complains about missing devices. We do not know which devices are missing. Here are the details: Customer had a zpool created on a hardware raid(SAN). There is no redundancy in the pool. Pool had 13 LUN''s, customer wanted to increase the size of and added 5 more Luns. During zpool add process system paniced with zfs

I have a 12 disk ZFS+ volume and this morning tried to look at some data on it and the ''ls'' command just hung. So I ran a ''zpool status'' which also proceeded to hang and return no data. I had to leave for work and when I came home the computer had shut down, which is weird. So I started the machine back up and I was able to run a zpool status, it returned