similar to: Slow Resilvering Performance

I have a situation where my zpool (with two radiz2s) is resilvering and reaches a certain point, then starts over. There no read, write or checksum errors. The disks do have a fair amount of resilvering to do, as I''ve had a variety of disk failures. But at the core of things, there''s enough parity data to avoid data loss, and the zpool is functioning fine, albeit in a

Just look at this. I thought all the restarting resilver bugs were fixed, but it looks like something odd is still happening at the start: Status immediately after starting resilver: # zpool status pool: rc-pool state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are unaffected. action: Determine

After several days of trying to get a 1.5TB drive to resilver and it continually restarting, I eliminated all of the snapshot-taking facilities which were enabled and 2009-10-29.14:58:41 [internal pool scrub done txg:567780] complete=0 2009-10-29.14:58:41 [internal pool scrub txg:567780] func=1 mintxg=3 maxtxg=567354 2009-10-29.16:52:53 [internal pool scrub done txg:567999] complete=0

Hi all I have this server with some 50TB disk space. It originally had 30TB on WD Greens, was filled quite full, and another storage chassis was added. Now, space problem gone, fine, but what about speed? Three of the VDEVs are quite full, as indicated below. VDEV #3 (the one with the spare active) just spent some 72 hours resilvering a 2TB drive. Now, those green drives suck quite hard, but not

Hello All I read this thread Resilver/scrub times? for a few minutes and I have recognize that I dont know the different between Resilvering and Scrubing. Shame on me. :-( I dont find some declarations in the man-pages and I know the command to start scrubing "zpool scrub tank" but what is the command to start resilver and what is the different? -- Best Regards Alexander Dezember, 20

hi, i have raid1 on zfs with 2 device on pool first device died and boot from second not working... i try to get http://mfsbsd.vx.sk/ flash and load from it with zpool import http://puu.sh/2402E when i load zfs.ko and opensolaris.ko i see this message: Solaris: WARNING: Can''t open objset for zroot/var/crash Solaris: WARNING: Can''t open objset for zroot/var/crash zpool status:

Hello, I''m working with someone who replaced a failed 1TB drive (50% utilized), on an X4540 running OS build 134, and I think something must be wrong. Last Tuesday afternoon, zpool status reported: scrub: resilver in progress for 306h0m, 63.87% done, 173h7m to go and a week being 168 hours, that put completion at sometime tomorrow night. However, he just reported zpool status shows:

I am trying to implement an ANOVA on a pair of quantile regression models in R. The anova.rq() function performs a basic check to see whether the models are nested, but I think this check is failing in my case. I think my models are nested despite the anova.rqlist() function saying otherwise. Here is an example where the GLM ANOVA regards the models as nested, but the quantile regression ANOVA

Hi, Thought I'd just forward this here, because I don't have time to look into it right now, and am off skiing next week. I'd guess that we should be checking for username = ``root'' before going off to do password checks, and rejecting it on that basis first. Cheers, Phil. -- Mind-numbingly stupid UK law alert! Act now to stop it! http://www.stand.org.uk/ --------------

Greetings - I'm battling POSIXct, as per the code below. My input is actually an XL file, but the weird results below correctly model what I am seeing in my program. Before I punt and use lubridate or timeDate, could anyone please help me understand why POSIXct forces my variable back to GMT? I suspect that I'm not properly coding the tzone value, but it does not throw an

I've tried codeweavers and winex and have tested my config with winecheck [100%] but yet no wine err:seh:EXC_DefaultHandling Unhandled exception code c0000005 flags 0 addr 0x400be29e I've used wine for years and I'm baffled why I have no wine Others with my distro [PeanutLinux] do run wine with no problem NVIDIA driver [ge2] win98 -- Galen Thurber Web Consultant For Hire

Grateful for any hints as to why I'm not getting the inner loop to cycle the expected number of times. Code and one run's results below. Thanks, Galen > # source("looptest.r") > sp<-numeric() > iter<-numeric() > rn<-numeric() > ds<-data.frame(sp, iter, rn) > > for (sp in c(1:6)) { + i<-1 +

I''ve got a Thumper running snv_57 and a large ZFS pool. I recently noticed a drive throwing some read errors, so I did the right thing and zfs replaced it with a spare. Everything went well, but the resilvering process seems to be taking an eternity: # zpool status pool: bigpool state: ONLINE status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An attempt was

Hello everyone, As one of the steps of improving my ZFS home fileserver (snv_134) I wanted to replace a 1TB disk with a newer one of the same vendor/model/size because this new one has 64MB cache vs. 16MB in the previous one. The removed disk will be use for backups, so I thought it''s better off to have a 64MB cache disk in the on-line pool than in the backup set sitting off-line all

Greetings – Grateful for any help on this one: In the following demo code, I am trying to get the points in the line to appear over the same x-axis labels as are used by the paired Bars. It appears, however, that R/lattice ignores the x-axis points used by the bars and plots the x points for the line at ½ points. Can you help me tweak this code so that the nth bump in the line

Dear R Community, I am trying to run a command line in R that will open an external program, have it import a specific input file, run the program, then close the program. The command line that I got from the developer of the model to do this looks like what you see below: c:\programx.exe -import 'inputx.inp' -run -quit I have been trying to use shell() or shell.exec() to run this in

Hello all, I understand that relatively high fragmentation is inherent to ZFS due to its COW and possible intermixing of metadata and data blocks (of which metadata path blocks are likely to expire and get freed relatively quickly). I believe it was sometimes implied on this list that such fragmentation for "static" data can be currently combatted only by zfs send-ing existing

for s10u2, documentation recommends 3 to 9 devices in raidz. what is the basis for this recommendation? i assume it is performance and not failure resilience, but i am just guessing... [i know, recommendation was intended for people who know their raid cold, so it needed no further explanation] thanks... oz -- ozan s. yigit | oz at somanetworks.com | 416 977 1414 x 1540 I have a hard time

Greetings - I am working on a piece of code to simulate vehicle times in and out in each of a number of parking spaces. At this stage, my code basically does what it is supposed to do but for the sequential number of each new parking event for a given space (i.e., the index of the loop variable). Instead of passing the index of the loop variable (iter) to the data frame, it passes the value

Greetings - I've got the following table (the result of a two-way table operation): f m 0 to 5 11.328000 6.900901 15 to 24 6.100570 5.190058 25 to 34 9.428707 6.567280 35 to 44 10.462158 7.513270 45 to 54 7.621988 5.692905 5 to 14 6.502741 6.119663 55 to 64 5.884737 4.319905 65 to 74 5.075606