similar to: Creating ZFS filesystem with inherited ACLs ?

Hi list, while preparing for the changed ACL/mode_t mapping semantics coming with onnv-147 [1], I discovered that in onnv-134 on my system ACLs are not inherited when aclmode is set to passthrough for the filesystem. This very much puzzles me. Example: $ uname -a SunOS os 5.11 snv_134 i86pc i386 i86pc $ pwd /Volumes/ACLs/dir1 $ zfs list | grep /Volumes rpool/Volumes 7,00G 39,7G 6,84G

Hello again. When I send e-mail locally from userX at mydomain to userY at mydomain the quota in userY at mydomain isn't updated with the new message, but the message arrives fine. It's not a userX problem, because it's equal if it's userY sending userX. When I save an message, the quota is updated. Or when the userX sends the e-mail, his quota is updated too. The problem is that

Hi, I tried again with some other options. After finding http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-November/093793.html I deleted every ACL from the directory Maildir and I also assigned the group "mail" to it, recursively: OmniOS-Xeon:/tank/home/olaf/Maildir/.Generiche $ ls -lV total 903 drwxrwxrwx 2 olaf mail 2 Sep 27 23:47 cur

I''m currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out user home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba. I have samba configured and integrated into our local active directory, with ACL mapping working. I''m a little confused as to the behavior of the ZFS ACL though. on a brand-new filesystem, touching a file results in: -rw-r--r-- 1 root

Hi everyone, I have just installed Solaris and have added a 3x500GB raidz drive array. I am able to use this pool (''tank'') successfully locally, but when I try to share it remotely, I can only read, I cannot execute or write. I didn''t do anything other than the default ''zfs set sharenfs=on tank''... how can I get it so that any allowed user can access

Hi everyone, I have just installed Solaris and have added a 3x500GB raidz drive array. I am able to use this pool (''tank'') successfully locally, but when I try to share it remotely, I can only read, I cannot execute or write. I didn''t do anything other than the default ''zfs set sharenfs=on tank''... how can I get it so that any allowed user can access

Hi, S10U3: It seems, that ufs POSIX-ACLs are not properly translated to zfs ACL4 entries, when one xfers a directory tree from UFS to ZFS. Test case: Assuming one has an user A and B, both belonging to group G and having their umask set to 022: 1) On UFS - as user A do: mkdir /dir chmod 0775 /dir setfacl -m d:u::rwx,d:g::rwx,d:o:r-x,d:m:rwx /dir # samba would

Hello forum. I''m in the process of re-organizing my server and ACL-settings. I''ve seen so many different ways of doing ACL, which makes me wonder how I should do it myself. This is obviously the easiest way, only describing the positive permissions: /usr/bin/chmod -R A=\ group:sa:full_set:fd:allow,\ group:vk:read_set:fd:allow \ However, I''ve seen people split each

All, Running Samba 3.5.4 on Solaris 10 with ZFS file system. I have issues where we have shared group folders. In these folders a userA in GroupA create file just fine with the correct inherited permissions 660. Problem is when userB in GroupA reads and modifies that file, with M$ office apps, the permissions get whacked to 060+ and the file becomes read only by everyone. I did

Dear Dovecot users, hello. I will merge two issues I have into a single email because they may be related. I used dovecot on a OmniOS server since 2014 (currently OmniOS r151014) with the following configuration (it shows 2.2.18 because I recently updated dovecot, skipping only the PostgreSQL plugin): # 2.2.18: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: SunOS 5.11 i86pc zfs mail_location =

On 2016-01-15, ROWLAND PENNY wrote: > Try running 'samba -b' this will show you where the AD DC expects to > find things, you should be able to work out from there what needs > changing on your system. Ok thanks. I wasn't sure which of the listed directories was important. I ran samba-tool with debug 9 and I think the issue is where it tries to create the sysvol volume,

Hi, Just playing with zfs and the admin manual ... # mkfile 100m /export/zfs/disk1 # zpool create data /export/zfs/disk1 # zfs create data/users # zfs mount -o remount,noatime data/users # zfs get all data/users NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE data/users type filesystem - data/users creation Mon Nov 20 11:25 2006

I'm sorry, but since I'm a SAMBA / Linux developer, I don't know how to answer your questions. What I can say is that before SAMBA (stand alone) was used in version 3.6.6, where the "username" option was used in the sharing settings. For example: SMB.CONF [folder] path = ... username = userX Thus, the following line was passed in a DOS script: net use x:

This is the first time I tried nfs with zfs. I shared the zfs filesystem with nfs, but i can''t write to the files though i mount it as read-write. This is for Solaris 10 update 4. I wonder if there is a bug? ---------------server (sdw2-2) #zfs create -o sharenfs=on data/nfstest #zfs get all data/nfstest NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE data/nfstest type

I have samba 4.3 running on FreeBSD 10.2 on ZFS and I am unable to create new GPOs, getting "invalid Parameter" response.Log files indicate ACL issues. Domain was provisioned with --use-ntvfs option.Filesystem is mounted with this options:zroot/ROOT/default on / (zfs, local, noatime, nfsv4acls) acl options on zfs are this:zroot/ROOT/default aclmode passthrough inherited from

Hi, I have samba 3.0.24 installed and running on my linux (debian alike) system as a (PDC) Standalone Server with an LDAP backend. The problem that I'm facing is that I want to have users belonging to multiple (LDAP) groups. My LDAP user ldif is like: # user1, People, local.loc dn: uid=user1,ou=xxxxx,dc=xxxxx objectClass: top objectClass: inetOrgPerson objectClass: posixAccount

I''ve installed SXDE (snv_89) and found that the web console only listens on https://localhost:6789/ now, and the module for ZFS admin doesn''t work. When I open the link, the left frame lists a stacktrace (below) and the right frame is plain empty. Any suggestions? I tried substituting different SUNWzfsgr and SUNWzfsgu packages from older Solarises (x86/sparc, snv_77/84/89,

The "valid users" parameter already existed in version 3 of the SAMBA and indicated which users were allowed to access the share. The "username" parameter indicated which user should be used when it was not defined at the time of mapping. SMB.CONF [folder] ... username = userX valid users = userX, userY, ... To map the "folder" share, only the following line was

Hi all, I'd appreciate any pointers or advise regarding the following issue with files written by M$ Office on Samba 3.0.32 on snv_98 (OpenSolaris) on a ZFS filesystem: samba share: [sharename] read only = No browseable = yes writeable = yes directory mask = 0770 create mask = 0770 delete readonly = Yes acl check permissions =

Hi there I just upgraded from 3.0.23d to 3.0.25b. The server acts as PDC and print server. The setup is that Win clients automtically download the printers from samba. Worked all right so far. Here is what I did. Compiled the new version and installed it. Stopped smbd and nmbd and copied everything under /old-samba/var/ to /new-samba/var/ "smb.conf" stayed the same. Fired up the