similar to: Re: How do I identify the initiating View from within aHelper?

I would like to call a helper method from my View to construct a sidebar menu. The menu is contextual, so ideally I would like to do something like this: View ---- <%= sidebar_menu %> Helper ------ def sidebar_menu case _calling_view_ when ''_view_identifier_'' ... build menu... end end where ''_calling_view_'' is the key that points to the

Is anyone else using liquid with the > 1 rspec? This seems to fail: it ''should render show'' do response.should render_template(''buyers/show'') get :show, :id => 1 end with an error like 1) NoMethodError in ''/buyer GET should render show'' You have a nil object when you didn''t expect it! The error occurred

Hi guys, I really like RJS. I think they''ll replace partials in alot of instances. Unfortunately, because they''re automatically used like .rhtml and .rxml and are hard to specifically specify it makes it messy to preserve fallbacks when using them. For instance, using partials instead of rjs, my create method might look like: def create post = Post.new(params[:post]) ...

The ability to choose a mocking framework is great as I prefer mocha, but I am have problems. On my controller specs, I am forced to ''integrate_views'' as the following code below shows you, the mocking of views is rspec specific. See stub! versus mocha''s stub unless block_given? unless integrate_views?

I''m using edge spec, edge rspec_on_rails, edge rails. I just switched to edge and ran the translator tool and I''m trying to get everything to pass again. One of my issues is getting render back up and working for my controller specs, here''s an example: describe "Requesting /users using GET" do controller_name :users setup do @user = mock_model(User)

Hi, James, Thanks for your reply. I do not think it is always true, that "mul then add" is faster than "add then mul". For example, A small immediate can be directly encoded in the instruction, but it becomes a larger one after a multiplication, which has to be loaded from the constant pool (extra memory access). So I wonder, is it possile to prevent it, via changes

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 07:13:52AM +0000, Nir Soffer wrote: > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:25 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > > It has to be said it would be really convenient to have a 'zero' > > and/or 'trim' method of some sort. > > > > 'trim' means discard? Yes. The 5 functions we could support are: * pread -

Wine 0.9.53, FreeBSD 6.3-PRERELEASE. When I installed Samsung OfficeServ Manager (OSM) for Samsung PBX, it works for OSM7200, but does not works for OSM 500. When I try to run it appear small error window with 'Run-time error 3633' and program closes. OSM ver. 3.17 at 2007.10.04. These lines appear in log file: fixme:spoolsv:serv_main (0 0x0) err:iphlpapi:getRouteTable Received

Yes - this has been in InstCombine for a long time: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineMulDivRem.cpp#L268 We could say that the canonicalization should be reversed, but that probably uncovers more missing optimizations. The code size concern is legitimate. For example on x86, gcc asm is 2 bytes smaller on this example:

On 03/12/2018 07:13 AM, Nir Soffer wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 12:32 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 07:13:52AM +0000, Nir Soffer wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:25 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>> It has to be said it would be really convenient to

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 12:32 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 07:13:52AM +0000, Nir Soffer wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:25 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > > It has to be said it would be really convenient to have a 'zero' > > > and/or 'trim' method of some

Thanks. I have checked the hook DAGCombiner::isMulAddWithConstProfitable And I think the above condition is too aggressive. // If the add only has one use, this would be OK to do. if (AddNode.getNode()->hasOneUse()) return true; Shall we make it to if (AddNode.getNode()->hasOneUse() && TargetLowering.isCheaperCommuteAddMul(......)) return true; The virtual hook

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 2:57 PM Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote: > On 03/12/2018 07:13 AM, Nir Soffer wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 12:32 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 07:13:52AM +0000, Nir Soffer wrote: > >>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:25 PM Richard W.M. Jones

I have a template that belongs to a certain model (model A). I need to call a helper method of a different model (model B). Then I need the helper method of B to call a helper method of model C. I tried using "include" and "require" and using namespaces, but I got "undefined method". What is the way to do it? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hello, I am very new to R. I have used Matlab in the past but not extensively. I would like to be able to convert an R script to Matlab. I should be grateful if you would point me towards ahelpful link to do so. Uma [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Does anyone have advice on how to go about locating the cause of this error message: ActionView::TemplateError (wrong number of arguments (3 for 1)) on line #4 of app/views/products/search.rhtml: 4: <%= start_form_tag :action => ''search'' %> I don''t see anything wrong with line 4 above. Some background: I''ve made a number of changes to Controllers,

I''ve checked the Rails documentation but find no mention of link_to ''external url'' or equivalent. Does rails have a built in method to do this? thanks -Lindsay -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I have successfully used HABTM to create a many-to-one-to-many set of rows in one step. Now, if two objects I want to associate already exist, how do I create the join row? The Agile book mentions the ''push_with_attributes'' method. The text says this method is useful for adding additional attributes to the join row (in the example a ''read_at'' timestamp). I

It is disappointing to see the limitation being put by Nvidia on low cost GPU usage on data centers. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/03/nvidia_server_gpus/ We thought of providing an option in glusterfs by which we can control if we want to use GPU or not. So, the concern of gluster eating out GPU's which could be used by others can be addressed. --- Ashish ----- Original

On 12/01/2018 3:14 AM, Darrell Budic wrote: > It would also add physical resource requirements to future client > deploys, requiring more than 1U for the server (most likely), and I?m > not likely to want to do this if I?m trying to optimize for client > density, especially with the cost of GPUs today. Nvidia has banned their GPU's being used in Data Centers now to, I imagine