similar to: redhat4.6-32bit DomU with pv driver can''t be saved

Hello everyone, I''m totally new to Xen and trying to run it on some platforms (x86, x64) using SLES (that is what I have to use for reasons other than technical). Several machines on which I tried using Xen simply fails to run normally using Xen kernel: either network communication is not functioning at all despite proper configuration (that works on non-Xen kernel), or the kernel

all, On latest tip, following symbols are unresolved when inserting modules xen_balloon: Unknown symbol totalhigh_pages xen_vnif: Unknown symbol netfront_accelerator_call_resume xen_vnif: Unknown symbol netfront_accelerator_call_suspend_cancel xen_vnif: Unknown symbol netfront_accelerator_call_stop_napi_irq xen_vnif: Unknown symbol balloon_update_driver_allowance xen_vnif: Unknown symbol

Hi, can anyone provide any pointers as to how to avoid this issue? A CentOS 5.3 domU on snv_111 dom0 is crashing on bott unless I remove /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.1.6.el5/kernel/drivers/xenpv_hvm dom0: haggis:~$ uname -a SunOS haggis 5.11 snv_111 i86pc i386 i86xpv Name: SUNWxvm Summary: Hypervisor Header Files Category: System/Virtualization State: Installed

Are the RPMs for the latest GFS kernel module GFS-kernel-2.6.9-72.2.0.8 to be used with the version 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL available ? I tried to compile the Source RPMs available from the Red Hat site but the modules can't be loaded because of invalid module format arising from version magic issues. The syslog shows: node0 kernel: gfs: version magic '2.6.9-55.0.9.ELsmp SMP 686 REGPARM

Hi all, my name is Hirofumi Tsujimura. We are porting and testing a PV-on-HVM in the IPF. This is a first time to send mail. I probably found the problem when I tested the VNIF. My operation for the test is following. 1. create a domain VTx and attach the VNIF in it. 2. create a domain U. 3. send a packet to the domain VTx from the domain U with ping command. Then, the domain VTx

Hi, Me and another sysadmin has independently been researching a problem where DomU randomly locks (Can’t reach it via xl console, no ping / SSH connection, shown as stuck in running-state in xentop) on two of our separate machines (installed completely independently): Dom0: Debian 7.0 with Xen version: 4.1.4 and xen-utils 4.1.4-3+deb7u1 Debian 7.1 with Xen version: 4.1 DomU: 7.0 7.1(.3)

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 12:07 PM, David Groep <davidg at nikhef.nl> wrote: > Dear all, > > Maybe I'm the only one - so before filing it as a bug: it appears that > the latest set of kernel patches in 3.10.0-693.11.6.el7 makes issue > 0013763 "CentOS 7.4 kernel (3.10.0-693*) fails to boot as Xen PV guest" > re-surface *also* with the CentOS PLUS kernel. But

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2008:0274 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2008-0274.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 478ae0ee8579ef930b92d966f55915f1 kmod-xenpv-0.1-9.el5.i686.rpm e46e1df0f5f1f9ad25db97126e3c6f25 kmod-xenpv-PAE-0.1-9.el5.i686.rpm Source:

Dear all, Maybe I'm the only one - so before filing it as a bug: it appears that the latest set of kernel patches in 3.10.0-693.11.6.el7 makes issue 0013763 "CentOS 7.4 kernel (3.10.0-693*) fails to boot as Xen PV guest" re-surface *also* with the CentOS PLUS kernel. But maybe in a different way ... Thanks to the (great!) quick work on making the plus kernel available (in #14330,

When backend disconnect, sync IO requests to the disk. Signed-off-by: Joe Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com> --- drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c

to convert hvm to pv guest, I have followed the direction( link<http://pastebin.com/f6a5022bf>) in Xen-Users Common Questions Guide. It says the first step is "install kernel-xen with correct initrd" After "yum install kernel-xen" was executed, following errors were showed: WARNING: No module xen_vbd found for kernel 2.6.18-164.15.1.el5xen, continuing anyway grubby

We're running Fedora Core and Samba-3.0.8-0.pre1.3 and we're authenticating our Windows XP users against Active Directory running on Windows 2003. Everything works fine! But now we're trying to secure and harden our WinXP machines and now when any user logged into a secured WinXP they get the errormessage "The account is not authorized to log in from this station". I browsed

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2008:0274 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2008-0274.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: db039012348802382642df92fbadfbf1 kmod-xenpv-0.1-9.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: 4e9d7cad6dd2ad7c1b31669d404df7a9 xenpv-0.1-9.el5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh

To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Thema: Re: [CentOS] Nvidia maximum pixel clock issue in kmod-nvidia-384.98 Dear All, Start BIOS Configuration and go to Graphic Configuration change On Board VGA to PCI Express x16 Automatic is VGA on Board Bis bald Alexander Am 09.01.2018 um 13:00 schrieb centos-request at centos.org: > Send CentOS mailing list submissions to >

Hello, I'm trying to create a vpn using TINC with a WindowsServer2003 as client, but I'm receiving the following messaging when running "tincd -n vpn -D -d5" -------------------- ... Trying to connect to server <...> Timeout from server <...> during authentication Could not set up a meta connection to server ... -------------------- I tried the same tinc

When I set the 'maximum password age' to 0, my password expired immediately after I did a smbpasswd. Shouldn't setting it to 0 mean the password will never expire? Or are there any other way to set password to never expire? Here is the microsoft's interpretation on 'maximum password age':

Microsoft has an add on for Windows 2003 SP1 that will do access based enumeration. This is great because of "out of sight, out of mind". If the user doesn't have privilege to access the directory or file it doesn't show up in the directory listing. http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/techinfo/overview/abe.mspx Any idea when samba will be able to do the same (if it

I have a windows 2003 server joined to my domain. I'd like to have IIS 6.0 on the 2k3 server authenticating against samba so that windows sharepoint services can be used. I've tried getting NTLM authentication working following instructions at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/WindowsServer2003/Library/IIS/7258232a-5e16-4a83-b76e-11e07c3f2615.mspx?mfr=true but I'm not

Hi I think I hit the cifs bug described at http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/WindowsShares and http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1776 As CentOS Wiki said, CentOS 5.0 do have a bug fixed cifs.ko, so I thought it should be in CentOSPlus repository ... so I upgrade my kernel and using 2.6.18-8.1.10.el5.centos.plus. After I use this kernel release, I check the cifs.ko and see the following: $