similar to: limit the disc access

I am running a Debian Squeeze Xen 4.0.1 Hypervisor and 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 dom0. My xen-tools.conf: lvm = vg00 size = 100Gb # Disk image size. memory = 2048Mb # Memory size swap = 2G # Swap size # noswap = 1 # Don''t use swap at all for the new system. fs = ext4 # use the EXT3 filesystem for the disk image. dist = `xt-guess-suite-and-mirror --suite` # Default

I think I wrote not very clearly. I say ''swap in domU will save in case lag or little mistake with balloon''. If course, there is no any kind of ballooning for dom0. Right now we running pretty much VMs for our cloud services and we use heavy memory management (it grabs and gives memory with lag less then second depends on usage in customers VM). And we have some statistics

When reading the wiki page about setting up new shares there is some information missing. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_and_configure_file_shares_with_Windows_ACLs The information I am missing most here is which posix.1 ACLs to set after creating the shares directory. There is only # mkdir -p /srv/samba/Demo/ but on my system that will create a directory that is owned by root:root

Hi, I just found out the hard way that sysvol replication with rsync stoped working when I activated winbind (libnss-winbind actually) on my primary AD DC. Originally I hadn't planed to activate winbind on the primary AD DC since that machine was not meant to provide any shares. What I hadn't thought of was the fact that GPOs reside as files on the sysvol share and thus are subject

Hi, I've been using Samba 3 (standalone server, workgroup setup) for a long looong time and now I want to migrate to Samba 4 AD DC setup with clients joined to the newly created AD domain and all the bells and whistles that come with it. I've setup an AD DC (Debian wheezy with samba from backports) that will only handle authentication and a second AD DC that will also serve shares.

Hi List, I say: xm create server7 Using config file "/etc/xen/vm/server7". Error: VM name ''server7'' already exists but xm list Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 24092 8 r----- 63.2 server7 512 2 0.0 ??? Best, Mike (XEN

Hi List, is it possible with the virt-manager to choose a drbd device? Example: 9:testsever Connected Primary/Secondary UpToDate/UpToDate C is running on /dev/sda9 but I can´t use it as a drive. (syntax?) Best, Mike _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi List, I have just two basic questions: 1) should I set for example dom0_mem=2048M at grub? 2) should I set xm mem-max 0 4000 ? irsh # dominfo 0 Id: 0 Name: Domain-0 UUID: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 OS Type: linux State: running CPU(s): 8 CPU time: 115.3s Max memory: 4096000 kB Used memory: 2075136 kB Autostart:

We are utilizing the xen hypervisor on nexenta with ISCSI as our method of communication with the guests (currently ubuntu but could be moving to centos). Obviously jumbo packet support would be nice to have. The last time I see that on the xen roadmap http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenRoadMap . Is there a canonical place that spells out if jumbo frames are now supported or still on the

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Kay Sievers <kay at vrfy.org> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:06:15PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: >>> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 07:43:34PM +0100, Kay

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Kay Sievers <kay at vrfy.org> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:06:15PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: >>> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 07:43:34PM +0100, Kay

Hi, I use rsync via rsnapshot to backup a large collection of files. Using "--fuzzy" already saves me a lot of time by discovering most renames that happen within a directory. Therfore I already use the "--delete-after" option. Now the question is, if fuzzy search could be extended to search for moved files across directory borders. If for example I move pictures aound to

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:06:15PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 07:43:34PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> > If the virtio device is a PCI device, it is

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:06:15PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 07:43:34PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> > If the virtio device is a PCI device, it is

Kay Sievers wrote: > Hi, > this simple program compiled with klibc: > > #include <stdio.h> > int main(int argc, char* argv[]) > { > setenv("TESTENV", "happy", 1); > printf("TESTENV='%s'\n", getenv("TESTENV")); > } > > prints: > > ./env > TESTENV='(null)' > >

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 07:43:34PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > If the virtio device is a PCI device, it is really best to > > treat it like you treat any other PCI function (I guess you mean > > function and not device, right? We support multifunction > > devices and some

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 07:43:34PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > If the virtio device is a PCI device, it is really best to > > treat it like you treat any other PCI function (I guess you mean > > function and not device, right? We support multifunction > > devices and some

On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 01:53:33PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Kay Sievers <kay at vrfy.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 01:46:49PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > >>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at

On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 01:53:33PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Kay Sievers <kay at vrfy.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 01:46:49PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > >>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at

Hi, I had trouble getting the pwdump program to work correctly on a german version of NT4SP3. I believe the problem is based on the fact that the german group 'Administrators' is called 'Administratoren', and Administrators is hard-coded into the utility. Would it be possible to make that an optional parameter? Unfortunately, I have no access to a C-Compiler on an NT-station, so