Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "WARNING: modpost: Found 10 section mismatch(es)."
2008 Feb 16
2
zaptel: modpost section mismatch ?
Building zaptel-1.4 from today's svn against kernel 2.6.25-git2:
............
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST 13 modules
WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es).
........
The other warnings were about "BIT" redefined, which I assume are benign.
Should I worry? If so, what do I do?
sean
2011 Jul 03
1
[PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix
[Sorry if duplicate, one earlier was corrupt]
Hi,
I got section mismatches reported by modpost in latest build. It got
reported for xen_register_pirq and xen_unplug_emulated_devices
functions. xen_register_pirq makes reference to
acpi_sci_override_gsi in init.data section; marking
xen_register_pirq with __init is not feasible since calls are made
to it from
2011 Jul 03
1
[PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix
[Sorry if duplicate, one earlier was corrupt]
Hi,
I got section mismatches reported by modpost in latest build. It got
reported for xen_register_pirq and xen_unplug_emulated_devices
functions. xen_register_pirq makes reference to
acpi_sci_override_gsi in init.data section; marking
xen_register_pirq with __init is not feasible since calls are made
to it from
2011 Jul 03
1
[PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix
[Sorry if duplicate, one earlier was corrupt]
Hi,
I got section mismatches reported by modpost in latest build. It got
reported for xen_register_pirq and xen_unplug_emulated_devices
functions. xen_register_pirq makes reference to
acpi_sci_override_gsi in init.data section; marking
xen_register_pirq with __init is not feasible since calls are made
to it from
2011 Mar 03
2
how should I go for Xen 4.0.1 with a non pv-ops Dom0 kernel
Hi,
I recently compiled a Xen-4.0.1 and pv-ops Dom0 2.6.32.27 kernel from
JF''s tree.Where my hypervisor could not boot and unfortunately the
system is rebooting so frequently that I am not able
to note down the error messages on a paper and pencil.So now I am
planning to go for a non pv-ops Dom0.I am not clear as what should be
the approach?
I have been Googling it every now and then and
2011 Mar 06
10
grub commands problem with Ubuntu 10.04
Following is one grub entry
menuentry "Ubuntu, Linux 2.6.32.27" {
insmod ntfs
set root=''(hd0,2)''
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 96f65c80f65c6313
loopback loop0 /ubuntu/disks/root.disk
set root=(loop0)
linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32.27 root=/dev/sda2
loop=/ubuntu/disks/root.disk ro quiet splash
initrd
2007 Apr 18
3
Section mismatch in parainstructions
Is it OK for section .parainstructions to reference
exit.text?
I'm seeing:
WARNING: drivers/net/hamradio/scc.o - Section mismatch: reference to .exit.text: from .parainstructions after '' (at offset 0x0)
WARNING: drivers/net/hamradio/scc.o - Section mismatch: reference to .exit.text: from .parainstructions after '' (at offset 0x8)
If that's OK, we need a small patch to
2007 Apr 18
3
Section mismatch in parainstructions
Is it OK for section .parainstructions to reference
exit.text?
I'm seeing:
WARNING: drivers/net/hamradio/scc.o - Section mismatch: reference to .exit.text: from .parainstructions after '' (at offset 0x0)
WARNING: drivers/net/hamradio/scc.o - Section mismatch: reference to .exit.text: from .parainstructions after '' (at offset 0x8)
If that's OK, we need a small patch to
2007 Apr 18
1
2.6.19-rc5-mm2: warnings in MODPOST and later
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:56:22 +0100
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> Since people were recently complaining about too many warnings:
> Here is a list of the warnings I'm getting in MODPOST and later.
>
> Since the warnings by far exceed the 100kB limit of linux-kernel (sic),
> I had to attach them compressed.
>
> With the exception of the
2007 Apr 18
1
2.6.19-rc5-mm2: warnings in MODPOST and later
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:56:22 +0100
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> Since people were recently complaining about too many warnings:
> Here is a list of the warnings I'm getting in MODPOST and later.
>
> Since the warnings by far exceed the 100kB limit of linux-kernel (sic),
> I had to attach them compressed.
>
> With the exception of the
2010 Jun 01
1
strange pvops problem
I compiled the pvops kernel like this :
[root@localhost xen-4.0.0]# ls
buildconfigs config Config.mk.orig dist extras
install.sh Makefile README tools xen
build-linux-2.6-pvops_x86_32 Config.mk COPYING docs file
linux-2.6-pvops.git messages stubdom unmodified_drivers
[root@localhost build-linux-2.6-pvops_x86_32]# make -j2 bzImage
2010 Jun 01
1
strange pvops problem
I compiled the pvops kernel like this :
[root@localhost xen-4.0.0]# ls
buildconfigs config Config.mk.orig dist extras
install.sh Makefile README tools xen
build-linux-2.6-pvops_x86_32 Config.mk COPYING docs file
linux-2.6-pvops.git messages stubdom unmodified_drivers
[root@localhost build-linux-2.6-pvops_x86_32]# make -j2 bzImage
2009 Aug 10
1
Build 2.6.20.2
Hi,
i try the kernel from [1] and get:
WARNING: vmlinux.o (__xen_guest): unexpected non-allocatable section.
Did you forget to use "ax"/"aw" in a .S file?
Note that for example <linux/init.h> contains
section definitions for use in .S files.
WARNING: modpost: Found 2 section mismatch(es).
To see full details build your kernel with:
''make
2011 Mar 02
5
installing xen on a vmware work station
Hi,
I decided to test new Xen pv-ops Dom0 kernel.
I have a 64 bit VT machine there in it Vmware work station installed
Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit
and then
apt-get install libcurl4-openssl-dev xserver-xorg-dev mercurial gitk
build-essential libncurses5-dev uuid-dev gawk gettext texinfo bcc
libncurses5-dev dpkg-dev debhelper iasl texinfo bridge-utils bison
flex apt-get build-dep xen-3.3
cd /usr/src
2010 Jul 14
2
2.6.32.16 - pv_ops kernel compile error
Hi,
Ubuntu 10.04 x64 installing xen4.0 testing
when compiling kernel 2.6.32.16 from jeremy git i get this error:
WARNING: modpost: Found 7 section mismatch(es).
To see full details build your kernel with:
''make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y''
GEN .version
CHK include/linux/compile.h
UPD include/linux/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD
2012 Jun 02
0
[LLVMdev] DFG of machine functions
I tried debugging it and the issue seems to be in the implementation of
MachineInstrIterator.h and the way it interacts with GraphWriter.h
functions. I found this by replacing the ( template <> struct
GraphTraits<MCDFGraph<MachineFunction*> >) with a similar MCDFGraph based
template of CFG similar to the one in MachineFunction.h (similarly
replacing the DOTGraphTraits with the
2012 May 31
2
[LLVMdev] DFG of machine functions
Hi,
I am trying to generate the DFG of machine functions.
Initially, I added a pass to generate the DFG of LLVM IR functions. This
was based on the mail thread -
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-September/025582.html. This
pass worked fine and I was able to generate DFG of LLVM IR functions.
Later, I ported the DFG pass code for machine functions. I ported the
InstIterator.h
2011 Jul 06
5
Error of building dom0 kernel
Hi all,
I follow instructions(http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps) to
build XEN and dom0 kernel. Building XEN has no problem, but there is an
error which I cannot solve to build dom0 kernel. The brief instructions for
building dom0 are get linux-2.6-xen code from git and make ARCH=x86_64
menuconfig, finally generate kernel.deb. (I did every step exactly as the
web page says)
2009 Jul 07
1
Installation from source on Ubuntu 9.04, make kernel failure
Hi all,
I install Xen on a fresh Ubuntu 9.04 from source. During the code runing it shows usually "Warning: not literal format or no paramaters". By "make" linux kernel after 1 hours code running it ends with: (The installation steps is shown below)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es).
To
2016 Mar 08
2
Need Help to Fix CVE-2008-1483, CVE-2008-5161, CVE-2015-5600 and CVE-2015-6565
Hi Gert,
Thanks for your reply.
But we can't upgrade to 7.2 version also we don't have plan to upgrade in
near future. Can I fix these vulnerabilities in the current version?
Regards
Abhishek
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:14:01PM +0530, abhi dhiman wrote:
> > Actually I am working