similar to: XCP 1.0-RC3 - 3Ware 9750 SAS Support

Greetings! I am running a samba 3.0.31 PDC with a flat smbpasswd back-end, and am ready to make the jump over to Samba 4 and ldb. I am planning on running both domains in parallel, while I migrate departments and users to the new Samba 4 domain. The problem is that I have people who will log on to machines on both domains in various locations, and I want to make sure they have access to

Hello! I've set up samba 4 with great success since alpha12, but i've always used a locally installed version of BIND. Is it possible to use a seperate BIND server instead? I'd like to not run BIND on my file server. I have not seen any instructions to this effect, so perhaps someone would please point me in the correct direction? Thank You Very Much!! ++AMARU

Dear list, I am battling with rather grave performance issues in the 42052 build of XCP 1.0. Specifically, this concerns disk IO both on the host and in the VMs. I have tested the connectivity to the NFS/iSCSI server that backs the whole platform (Nexenta, SSD ZIL/l2arc, striping over 9 5-disk zraid1), and from a clean Ubuntu install, I am able to saturate the network both over NFS and iSCSI

Hi, I was wondering if anyone has successfully configured two lsi/3ware 9750-4i series controllers for multipathing under CentOS 5.7 x86_64? I've tried some basic setups with both multibus and failover settings, and had repeatable filesystem corruption over a iscsi(tgtd) or nfs3 connection. Any ideas? Vahan

I''m looking to expose a(several) drive "/dev/sda" that is physically to the XCP host to a pv guest running locally. I know this would tie the VM, which lives in a remote SR, to this specific XCP host that this local disk. I''m not looking to create a VHD file on this local drive and use it as a disk in the VM. I''m looking to expose entire physical disks to

Hello, this would be just a quick question: Is it possible to perform a p2v conversion from xcp-1.0 beta (or xcp 0.5) *.iso installation image? According to documentation (Administration && VM installation guide) yes, but there seems to be no such option to select during the boot. Thanks in advance. -- Daniel Sintaj http://daan.datacloud.sk

Can somebody educate me as the differences between XCP-1.0 and XEN 4. From what I can see XCP-1.0 has XEN 3.4.2 So why would you not build XCP-1.0 with XEN 4.0 Regards David Moore moored@romtech.com.au J.P. MCP, MCSE, MCSE + INTERNET, CNE. www.adsldirect.com.au for ADSL and Internet www.romtech.com.au for PC sales Office Phone: (+612) 9453 1990 Fax Phone: (+612) 9453 1880 Mobile Phone:

Anyone here using the XCP 1.0 Storage EqualLogic has the dell? In Citrix XenServer Xencerter appears to integration, but in XenCenter not with XCP. I read that the drivers were removed. No way around installing the drivers again? Cordialmente, Lorscheider Santiago +55 85 81559040 Msn: lorscheider_santiago@hotmail.com Visite meu blog: http://lsantiago.spaces.live.com Twitter:

Hi all, I am experimenting an issue with XCP 1.0 and NetApp storage model . My XCP server has a QLE2460 single channel fibre card. I have successfully connected the server to the storage. I can see the LUN connected via fibre channel by using scli command: scli output: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- HBA Instance 0: QLE2460 Port 1

Package: xcp-xapi Version: 1.3.2-8 Severity: important Tags: patch Found race condition (specific only to slave hosts): xcp-xapi can start earlier than xcp-networkd due lack of dependency in init.d script. Syptoms: After reboot slave's xcp does not work: xe (anything): The host failed to acquire an IP address on its management interface and therefore cannot contact the master. log:

I''m trying to build out a test cloud using XCP 1.0.0 beta with 3 machines of 18 cores total (Phenom II 1090s). I''ve built three machines, installed XCP 1.0.0 beta on them and they all three have the same problem - the Realtek network cards don''t work. The following is the output from lspci 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI

Package: xcp-xapi Version: 1.3-16 Severity: normal Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, Path to "xe" program in /usr/lib/xcp/bin/xe-mount-iso-sr should be: XE="/usr/bin/xe" HTH, David -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)

Package: xcp-xapi Version: 1.3.2-6 Severity: minor Tags: upstream Builin utility for lowlevel vm boot repairment xe-edit-bootloader contains wrong path to xe. IS: XE="/usr/lib/xcp/bin/xe" MUST BE: XE="/usr/bin/xe" -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux

Package: xcp-xapi Version: 1.3.2-7 Severity: normal xcp-xapi fails to eject host from pool with following error: xe pool-eject host-uuid=a6806a39-442d-f17d-b7a0-59161d18f56f WARNING: Ejecting a host from the pool will reinitialise that host's local SRs. WARNING: Any data contained with the local SRs will be lost. Type 'yes' to continue yes The server failed to handle your request,

Hi I install the xcp from the http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/XAPI_on_Ubuntu. But I got this error while configuring xcp-xapi: xcp-networkd (1.3.2-1ubuntu1~oneiric1) wird eingerichtet ... Starting the XCP networking daemon: .............................. * failed to start xcp-networkd. invoke-rc.d: initscript xcp-networkd, action "start" failed. when I comment the

Hi list, Saw that there''s a patch for xenserver 5.6fp1 which should fix this: http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX129267 Anybody know if/when this will happen on XCP? I have the same problem - disk usage remains the same after snapshot deletion - this is in the log on the pool master: vhd-util: libvhd::vhd_validate_footer: invalid footer cookie: ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ This guy has the same

Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 18:54:52 +0000 Source: xcp-storage-managers Binary: xcp-storage-managers Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.1.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: PKG-Xen Devel <pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> Description:

Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 01:52:39 +0200 Source: xcp-vncterm Binary: xcp-vncterm Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.1-2.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: PKG-Xen Devel <pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher at debian.org> Description: xcp-vncterm -

Package: xcp-storage-managers Version: 0.1.1-3 Severity: normal This was already reported in the archived bug 691805 but I sent an e-mail and I received back permanent delivery failure because this bugs has been archieved. Still the path of "pidof" in the file /usr/lib/xcp/sm/iscsilib.py is wrong on Wheezy. It should be /bin/pidof instead of /sbin/pidof root at xcpcompute2:~# cat

Package: xcp-xapi Version: 1.3.2-8 Severity: minor During upgrade from 1.3.2-7 to 1.3.2-8 got follwing message on slave host (upgrade was simulatanious on slave and master): ... Setting up xcp-xapi (1.3.2-8) ... The server failed to handle your request, due to an internal error. The given message may give details useful for debugging the problem. message: INTERNAL_ERROR: [