similar to: Trace SRIOV NIC''s MSI-X delivery to Xen

Hi, I am working of Intel 82576 device to test the SRIOV functionality. I want to assign VFs to a VMs(domU) and verify the control and data path. I installed Xen-unstable with 2.6.30-rc3(dom0). But the SRIOV functionality isn''t working, because MSI is not supported. Please let me know, what version of Xen and dom0 supports above functionality? Is there any tool available to manage SRIOV

Hello, We encountered a problem while testing SRIOV on kubevirt [1]: We are currently using the Device "hostdev" generic options to pass-through the VF to the guest. It is not done through the "interface" (with type hostdev) because that option requires access to the PF which is not available in our case (the VF is moved to the container namespace where libvirt runs, but not

Hello Everyone, Can any one help me understand, if by Enabling or Disabling the VT - d makes any difference for the 10G SRIOV to function correctly? Thank YOu. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hello Everyone, Can any one help me understand, if by Enabling or Disabling the VT - d makes any difference for the 10G SRIOV to function correctly? Thank YOu. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Dear List , We are using intel 82599EB based SRIOV capable 10GbE cards on the host machine.The VFs are being assigned to the guest in pass through mode and are providing the network connectivity as expected. However when we shutdown the guest the connectivity does not comes back via the VFs on the guest in next boot unless the VFs are detached from the *guest* *before* initiating a shutdown of

Hi all, Who can tell me how to install xen4.0.1 from source on centos5.4? I cannot find the yum repositories for the version of 4.0.1. Best Wishes Qiang Ma _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi, I am trying to use SRIOV, usnig xen 4.0 on debian. On my dom0, xm pci-list-assignable-devices show that 0000:0f:10.0 0000:0f:10.2 0000:0f:10.4 0000:0f:10.6 0000:0f:11.2 0000:0f:11.4 0000:0f:11.6 these virtual interfaces correspond to eth2, i attach 0f:10.0 to a domU ubuntu machine, xm pci-attach ubuntu 0f:10.0 on my dom0 machine, i can ping other machine using eth2, (implying PF on eth2

Hi, I am trying to use SRIOV, usnig xen 4.0 on debian. On my dom0, xm pci-list-assignable-devices show that 0000:0f:10.0 0000:0f:10.2 0000:0f:10.4 0000:0f:10.6 0000:0f:11.2 0000:0f:11.4 0000:0f:11.6 these virtual interfaces correspond to eth2, i attach 0f:10.0 to a domU ubuntu machine, xm pci-attach ubuntu 0f:10.0 on my dom0 machine, i can ping other machine using eth2, (implying PF on eth2

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 06:04:36PM +0300, Edward Haas wrote: > The PCI addresses appearing on the domxml are not the same as the ones > mappend/detected in the VM itself. I compared the domxml on the host > and the lspci in the VM while the VM runs. Can you clarify what you are comparing here ? The PCI slot / function in the libvirt XML should match, but the "bus" number in

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:22 AM, john fisher <john@jpfisher.net> wrote: > I get this error: > "error: Failed to create domain from ./vm0.xml > error: internal error Process exited while reading console log output: > kvm: -device > pci-assign,host=01:10.1,id=hostdev0,configfd=47,bus=pci.0,addr=0x8: > Duplicate ID 'hostdev0' for device " > > Ideas?

On 02/26/2014 08:43 PM, Dax Kelson wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:22 AM, john fisher <john@jpfisher.net > <mailto:john@jpfisher.net>> wrote: > > I get this error: > "error: Failed to create domain from ./vm0.xml > error: internal error Process exited while reading console log > output: kvm: -device >

We are using an Intel 82599 chip that allows 4 PFs ( eth0..3) per VM. I am able to manually start VMs using the hostdev definition for the four network connections, but I'd like to start using the pool approach. Ubuntu 12.04 libvirt 1.0.0 Following: http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking#Assignment_from_a_pool_of_SRIOV_VFs_in_a_libvirt_.3Cnetwork.3E_definition I can get a pool working with

Hello, http://pasik.reaktio.net/xen/patches/xen-pvscsi-drivers-linux-2.6.32.27-pvops-v01.diff This is the first version of Xen PVSCSI drivers, both the scsiback backend and scsifront frontend, ported from Novell SLES11SP1 2.6.32 Xenlinux kernel to pvops xen/stable-2.6.32.x branch. At the moment it''s *only* compile-tested with the latest xen/stable-2.6.32.x git kernel as of today

Hi, I am trying to setup Xen to use "PV on HVM". For this, I did the following. (1) I followed the tutorial at http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Fedora13Xen4Tutorial to setup Xen4.0.1 on Fedora13. I am able to run virt-manager and create a Fedora 13 guest. (2) I followed the tutorial at http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2010/05/27/pv-on-hvm-at-xen-4-0-on-top-of-fedora-13/to use PV on

Hi, I created an HVM type virtual machine and installed RHEL5U7 guest in it. I have assigned 7 scsi disks to the virtual machine in physical mode (using phy:), however, I see those disks are xvd and not as scsi. Is anyone aware what the problem might be ? Please let me know what kind of information do I need to post in order to narrow down to the problem. Thanks, K

We are running a 2-node cluster with Debian Squeeze (2.6.32-5-xen-amd64) and Xen 4.0.1 on the dom0 and Ubuntu lucid domUs. We are now using fully virtualized (HVM) vms. In our configuration the dom0 administers to domUs created and run on a SAN box accessed via private network (192.168...). A sample configuration file is pasted below. We have had little or no IO problem with HVMs created and

On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 03:23:11PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 09:36:53AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 07:32:25PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 12:02:39PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > > > There is a new feature bit allocated in virtio spec to > > > > support SR-IOV

On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 03:44:11PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 08:11:54PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 03:23:11PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 09:36:53AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 07:32:25PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > On

Wondering if I can get some opinions on dom0 CPU pinning and xm weighting. We have several xen servers on SLES11SP1 and up to this point we have never done anything with pinning CPU''s to dom0. We''re trying to decide if we should be doing that. Same goes for xm weighting (if I''m saying that correctly). For example, running the following command when a xen server

Hi, I managed to get SR-IOV with an Intel I350 NIC to work.For this I followed the documentation on this page: https://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking#Assignment_from_a_pool_of_SRIOV_VFs_in_a_libvirt_.3Cnetwork.3E_definition But as I have more VMs then VF on the NIC I also have a bridge wich serves the other guests. As I run Debian Buster as host I followed the documentation here: