similar to: Receiving packets for a different ip @

Hi, We have a Kamailio and Asterisk cluster, both machines being on a real 103.x IP address and also on a 172.x OpenVPN address. The problem is that when Kamailo receives a call from the VPN and forwards it to the Asterisk server on it's 103.x address, Asterisk never sees the call. If Kamailio receives a call from the VPN and forwards the call to the Asterisk server on it's 172.x

Hi, I face a problem which look like the same as David with his thread "Asterisk not receiving call from VPN address". I had an Asterisk (Elastix) working well in a VM (Debian Wheezy - KVM) having IP 192.168.111.14, my phone network is in the range 192.168.10.x I updated lately to 11.7.0 version and now no one of my phones can register anymore to the asterisk. Ngrep as well as

Asterisk 1.4.29 BLF-SUBSCRIBE go to internal IP (ngrep output): U 2010/03/02 11:34:06.013515 212.78.xxx.xxx:2048 -> 62.134.xxx.xxx:5060 SUBSCRIBE sip:12 at 62.134.xxx.xxx SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 212.78.xxx.xxx:2048;branch=z9hG4bK-d28tfohos0vh;rport..From: <sip:K922002626 at 62.134.xxx.xxx>;tag=vyx8c0trgx..To: <sip:12 at 62.134.xxx.xxx>;tag=as13e7cb7c..Call-ID:

Hi there I am wondering if anybody can help me illuminate a problem I am having with my asterisk installation. I am using: - IP phone (Siemens gigaset S685IP) behind a modem/router that has ports udp 5060 and 10000:10100 forwarded to the static ip of the IP phone (192.168.0.3). This has to go to: - modem that operates in half bridge mode (no nat) to a linux firewall (does natting ip is

pc1(LANa) ----poor connection ----> VPS <--------- PC2(LANb) pc1 and pc2 used to connected directly with tinc, since pc1 used to have WAN IP(pppoe), but the pppoe IP is not WAN IP anymore (ISP changed to let all ADSL user in a LAN). if I let the two pc connect to a VPS with tinc, can later connections between pc1 and pc2 be directly ? for example, ssh from pc1 to pc2 but not proxyed by

Hello! I bought a virtual IP line to my ISP to use with my asterisk but when I try to connect it to my ISP tells me I can not use and I can only use with a softphone that gives me, xlite ready configured. I use ngrep to see what information sent on xlite for communication, the User-Agent was changed so I change the User-Agent to my asterisk to the same as saying the xlite but still does not work.

Hi all I have a problem to register a cisco 7960 to an asterisk 1.2.2 I defined in sip.conf the next : ["phonenumber"] type=friend username="username" secret="password" host=dynamic context=work I am trying to catch the register requests with sip debug with no success (empty screen). I can only catch the register messages with ngrep on

On Mon, June 27, 2016 12:29, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 06/26/2016 01:50 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> However, all I am seeking is knowledge on how to handle this using >> iptables. I am sure that this defect/anomaly has already been >> solved wherever it is an issue. Does anyone have an example on >> how to do this? > > > I think the bit you're missing is

Hello all, It''s my first letter on this list, and, my English is not very well. Please take me indulgence for grammar/syntax and over erorrs :)) I have trouble for acl''s of ip range. But, acl for one host (with ip adress) work fine. Please help me for make work acl/find erorr in acl. Becouse I''m new shorewall user, I maked test configuration on Virtual Mashine

vps*CLI> iax2 show channels Channel Peer Username ID (Lo/Rem) Seq (Tx/Rx) Lag Jitter JitBuf Format 0 active IAX channels vps*CLI> core show channels Channel Location State Application(Data) 0 active channels 0 active calls vps*CLI> sip show channels Peer User/ANR Call ID Seq (Tx/Rx) Format

I'm having a problem redirecting to voicemail. This may be an asterisk bug I'm not sure, can somebody confirm? Network layout GATEWAY - Asterisk 1.0.8-BRIstuffed-0.2.0-RC8h connected to a PRI line. (Additionally patched with http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=2687) PROXY - Ser version: ser 0.9.3 (i386/freebsd) FEATURE - Asterisk 1.0.8-BRIstuffed-0.2.0-RC8h handling voicemail.

On Fri, June 24, 2016 12:24, John R Pierce wrote: > On 6/24/2016 9:20 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> We received a notice from our pci-dss auditors respecting this: >> >> CVE-2002-0510 The UDP implementation in Linux 2.4.x kernels keeps >> the >> IP Identification field at 0 for all non-fragmented packets, which >> could allow remote attackers to determine that

I noticed a large performance boost both on bare metal and in vps instances by turning on kernel routing in the tinc config, and using full host declerations for routs rather than dumping things to the tun interface ambiguously. "Forwarding = kernel" ip route add 1.2.3.4 via 4.3.2.1 dev tun -instead of- ip route add 1.2.3.4 dev tun On May 17, 2017 3:10 PM, "Niklas Hambüchen"

Hi Several questions below: a) is it possible to block IP addresses on a per mountpoint level e.g. my user with /mountpointA.ogg does not mind being hammered by connections from 93.184.216.34 [example.com] but my user with /mountpointB.ogg wants to block that IP address. b) is it possible to geoblock ranges of IP addresses and whole countries on a per mountpoint basis? c) what options do

On a VPS I wanted to add to IP tables:- iptables -A XXXX -p tcp -m string --algo bm --string 'login' -j DROP I got: iptables: Unknown error 18446744073709551615 uname -a = 2.6.35.4 #2 (don't know how this got installed) lsmod | grep ipt = ipt_LOG 5419 2 yum upgrade iptables* = nothing to install. --------------------------------------- On a standalone server (C 5.6)

Hi, I've recently migrated my emails from a Yahoo account to my own mailserver on a VPS. Ever since then, Thunderbird seems to have issues with the mailbox's directory structure: When I start Thunderbird, it immediately deletes the local copies of all 3rd-level folders (i.e. subfolders of a subfolder of a folder in the mailbox root). Since that didn't happen with the Yahoo account, I

Hi, I have two identical machines with exactly the same CentOS 5.4 kickstarted from the same sources, and the same packages installed. Their cpuinfos are identical, and they are running libvirt 0.6.3 with the very same libvirtd.conf. Yet... One of them works fine, the other says "no supported architecture for os type 'hvm'" for the same template (attached) and image. Any

The virtio pstore driver provides interface to the pstore subsystem so that the guest kernel's log/dump message can be saved on the host machine. Users can access the log file directly on the host, or on the guest at the next boot using pstore filesystem. It currently deals with kernel log (printk) buffer only, but we can extend it to have other information (like ftrace dump) later. It

The virtio pstore driver provides interface to the pstore subsystem so that the guest kernel's log/dump message can be saved on the host machine. Users can access the log file directly on the host, or on the guest at the next boot using pstore filesystem. It currently deals with kernel log (printk) buffer only, but we can extend it to have other information (like ftrace dump) later. It

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 05:08:00PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > The virtio pstore driver provides interface to the pstore subsystem so > that the guest kernel's log/dump message can be saved on the host > machine. Users can access the log file directly on the host, or on the > guest at the next boot using pstore filesystem. It currently deals with > kernel log (printk) buffer