similar to: PCI DSS 2.0 Good News

Signed-off-by: Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com> --- src/test/functional/host_controller_test.rb | 41 -------------------- .../functional/managed_node_configuration_test.rb | 14 ++++--- src/test/functional/nic_controller_test.rb | 8 ---- src/test/functional/permission_controller_test.rb | 15 ++++--- src/test/functional/quota_controller_test.rb | 2 +-

Ok, the story is this, I''m running an Unreal Tournament 2004 server. It''s running on a system that has two external NICs that are connected to different ISPs. I would like players to be able to connect to the server from either link. My default gateway goes through NIC1. For traffic through NIC2 to work I simply added an extra routing table and rule. The extra routing table has

Hello everyone, can someone please tell me if the configuration previously shown is eventually going to work? Stefano Il giorno lun 19 ott 2020 alle ore 18:56 Stefano Vargiu < vstefanoxx at gmail.com> ha scritto: > I add some additional information I didn't give in my previous email, > specifically how I tried to force DC1 and DC2 to contact each other only > with their VPN

I have a problem browsing in my subnets let me explain me situation: I have a m0n0wall (FreeBSD based router software) with 3 nics. nic1:My WAN connection Nic2:My LAN connection (192.168.0.0/24 m0n0 is DHCP) Nic3:My Wifi connenciot (192.168.1.0/24 m0n0 is DHCP) just using ip-adresses acrossed the network is no problem. now i want to use windows browsing works on LAN but can't see the

I add some additional information I didn't give in my previous email, specifically how I tried to force DC1 and DC2 to contact each other only with their VPN IPs. I did so using dnsmasq as a DNS proxy. # DC1 configuration IP NIC1: 172.16.0.2 IP NIC2: 172.20.0.1 IP VPN: 172.19.1.173 --- /etc/resolv.conf: search domain.local domain domain.local nameserver 172.19.1.173 --- I configured dnsmasq

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 7:42 AM Stefano Vargiu via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I'm trying to add a second DC to a Samba 4 AD: they both have multiple NICs > and for this reason cannot find a way to make it work. > They communicate through VPN and both have one of the bound interfaces set > to the same IP address, 172.20.0.1, which

On 19/10/2020 12:40, Stefano Vargiu via samba wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm trying to add a second DC to a Samba 4 AD: they both have multiple NICs > and for this reason cannot find a way to make it work. > They communicate through VPN and both have one of the bound interfaces set > to the same IP address, 172.20.0.1, which doesn't allow me to route to the > correct

Hello everybody, I use 2 samba servers. Server A (SA) is connected to networks n1 and n2. It is the wins server and the domain controller with domain logons and used as password server. Server B (SB) is connected to networks n2 and n3. As diagram it looks like this: +---n2-----(SA)----n1--+ | (SB) | +-------n3---+ Server B's smb.conf has: ... time server = yes domain master = no local

Hi, is it possible to have 2 different ISP in one server? i have 2 NIC cards im going to config ISP1 in NIC1 and ISP2 in NIC2? what should be the configuration for this setup? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070412/4c62019f/attachment-0004.html>

Hello everyone, I'm trying to add a second DC to a Samba 4 AD: they both have multiple NICs and for this reason cannot find a way to make it work. They communicate through VPN and both have one of the bound interfaces set to the same IP address, 172.20.0.1, which doesn't allow me to route to the correct DC, and that is only part of the problem. Here is the configuration: *

hello all, I have been trying to set-up bridged network with VLAN and not able to succeed as many tutorials address only single NIC. I am trying to setup 2 guests (backtrack instance) each guest has NIC1 and NIC2. following is snippet for guest1 I am not able to get 192.168.0.2 address back on guest eth0. VIRT-MANAGER GUI : guest1-lan details radio button left side panel NIC1

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Boris Epstein <borepstein at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello there, > > What is the hypervisor that hosts the VM? What does ifconfig show on it? > > Boris. > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On 11/06/2016 11:00 PM, Sean Son wrote: > > > >> How do I

Hi, I've just joined the list because of questionnaire in the forum [1]. The hardware is AMD-V(IOMMU) capable and is enabled in the BIOS with 3 NICs. I currently have host Windows 2008 R2 installed but binds (network services and protocols) on NIC3 only. My guests on VMWare workstation (has bridged network service bound on all 3 NIC) has bridged 3 NICs for the guests where NIC1 is WAN, NIC2

libvirt-users@redhat.com TCP Tunnel Info I've been looking at the TCP Tunnel network feature as a potential replacement for the extra private internal networking configuration file. Usecase: This network is supposed to go from VM1 to VM2 without DHCP, DNS or any incoming/outgoing connections to the host or outside world possible. https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsNICSTCP *

I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I add a virtual interface. It's got something to do with the NIC ordering or with the xen network script having a problem with multiple NICs and virtual interfaces. I could need some help/comments on this. Some history: I added a NIC (chip identifies as Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit

Hi folks.. just a few weeks ago I wrote this to someone else: ------------------------ We have several 2900s in production as VoIP servers.. no lockups. On every server I go into the BIOS and: * Disable USB * Disabled uneeded things like Parallel, Serial * Put ETH0 on a seperate IRQ from the Digium card And everything's fine. Dell's do NOT have to share IRQs... go into your BIOS and

Hi, Reward offered: 50$ (paypal), and I am sure this is a ridiculous thing I have missing. My goal: On a 2 NIC Asterisk box, to send packets that came in Asterisk on NIC1 back to NIC 1, and NIC2 back to NIC 2. (basically, send them back the same way they came from). I have been doing what was recommended to me and mangling packets left and right. I have reached a point where I am

Hi Everyone, How does one install Ubuntu 10.04 DomU in PV mode when running Xen 4.0? My Dom0 is also running 10.04. Can I still use the CD? Thanks _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

topology : two guest connected to physical LAN (vlan 620 and vlan 621) on host : 1) creating bridge br0 2) creating bridge for guest 1 and guest 2 - to separate traffic 3) virtual network1 : I have default NAT 192.168.122.x DHCP feeding IP to eth1 4) virtual network2 : I want to use 192.168.0.0 for eth0 my question is what would be my virtual network2 looks like : following is default xml :

I have a T400P in my main building M and am going to put asterisk boxes in two buildings A & B. I already have our wan on fiber running between the buildings (including some extra strands) and the distance is beyond straight Ti distance so I would need csu... to use copper. It occurred to me that I could use TDMoE - and it may be less costly. My assumption is that the best to avoid the