similar to: Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen build and pvops kernel

HI, I am trying to install xen through yum. Here is what I did. [root@localhost Kishore]# yum install kernel-xen xen Setting up Install Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.31.9-174.fc12 set to be installed --> Processing Dependency: kernel-firmware >= 2.6.31.9-174.fc12 for package: kernel-2.6.31.9-174.fc12.x86_64

Hello, If you''re interested in running Xen 4.0 hypervisor/dom0 on RHEL6, take a look at here: http://wiki.xen.org/xenwiki/RHEL6Xen4Tutorial It explains steps needed to rebuild Xen 4.0.1 src.rpm from Fedora on RHEL6, and how to fetch dom0 capable 2.6.32.x kernel from upstream git repository. It also shows how to get libvirt/virt-manager working with Xen on RHEL6. Hopefully it helps :)

Hello, If you''re interested in running Xen 4.0 hypervisor/dom0 on RHEL6, take a look at here: http://wiki.xen.org/xenwiki/RHEL6Xen4Tutorial It explains steps needed to rebuild Xen 4.0.1 src.rpm from Fedora on RHEL6, and how to fetch dom0 capable 2.6.32.x kernel from upstream git repository. It also shows how to get libvirt/virt-manager working with Xen on RHEL6. Hopefully it helps :)

This one about pvops kernel 2.6.32.24 under Xen 4.0.1 on top of Ubuntu 10.10 Desktop http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2010/10/15/set-up-xen-4-0-1-libvirt-0-8-3-on-top-of-ubuntu-10-10-desktop/ Boris. --- On Thu, 10/21/10, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@iki.fi> wrote: From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@iki.fi> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen build and pvops kernel To:

1. Attempt to load Nexenta under 2.6.32.16-1.2.108.xendom0.fc13.x86_64 Xen 4.0.1-rc6-pre & 2.6.32.16-1.2.108.xendom0.fc13.x86_64 on top F13 [root@fedora13 NexentaStor-Community-3.0.2]# uname -a Linux fedora13 2.6.32.16-1.2.108.xendom0.fc13.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jul 23 17:09:30 MSD 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@fedora13 NexentaStor-Community-3.0.2]# xm create -c

Guys! Tomorrow in my "live" presentation at Linuxcon Xen Directions! I''ll show the Xen Live CD to the public! To celebrate! I want to share my last procedure to get and run Xen 4.0.1 on Ubuntu 10.04 64 bits, here we go: The procedure: 1- Install all the packages: aptitude update aptitude install bridge-utils build-essential libncurses5-dev dpkg-dev debhelper

After download of Xen4.0, Is there a simple way to disable to not download from git implicitly ? (I already did it offline and would like to use that build instead.) Idea is: "make world" would not enforce git automatically. Any suggestions ? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

Hello, I just wrote a step-by-step tutorial how to install the latest Xen 4.0.1 hypervisor on Fedora 13 (x86_64) host from src.rpm packages, and the pvops dom0 kernel from git repository. Check it out: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Fedora13Xen4Tutorial It also shows how to install various Xen PV guests using the native distro installers: - CentOS 5.5 - Fedora 13 - Ubuntu 10.04 LTS

Hello, I just wrote a step-by-step tutorial how to install the latest Xen 4.0.1 hypervisor on Fedora 13 (x86_64) host from src.rpm packages, and the pvops dom0 kernel from git repository. Check it out: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Fedora13Xen4Tutorial It also shows how to install various Xen PV guests using the native distro installers: - CentOS 5.5 - Fedora 13 - Ubuntu 10.04 LTS

>.. And KMS modesetting works properly now in Xen dom0! My onboard ATI Radeon is the following: > # lspci -v | grep VGA  11:04.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc ES1000 (rev 02) (prog-if 00   [VGA controller]) Environment :  Xen 4.0.1-rc6 & 2.6.32.19 on top of F13 ( .config attached) [root@fedora13 ~]# lspci -v | grep VGA 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI

Hi As you may''ve seen from my last posts I''m struggling to get the setup on my subject line to work without flaws. I''ve tried compiling the Kernel from Source, I''ve also tried Fedora 14, which has a flaky pv_ops Dom0 kernel which DOESN''T work at all, but none of these seem to work. I''m a mid-time XEN user, I just love it and want to stay

Hi As you may''ve seen from my last posts I''m struggling to get the setup on my subject line to work without flaws. I''ve tried compiling the Kernel from Source, I''ve also tried Fedora 14, which has a flaky pv_ops Dom0 kernel which DOESN''T work at all, but none of these seem to work. I''m a mid-time XEN user, I just love it and want to stay

Hi All, I followed the instructions here at http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/06/10/setup-fedora-11-pv-domu-at-xen-3-4-1-dom0-kernel-2-6-30-rc6-tip-on-top-of-fedora-11/ However, when I do a "make menuconfig", I cannot see any XEN related configuration options. What am I missing? Thank you. Mr. Teo En Ming Dip(Mechatronics Engineering) BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering)

Folks, The first release candidate for Xen 4.0.0 has been tagged and published. You can grab it from here: http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg (tagged ''4.0.0-rc1'') Please test it! -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Is there any real user for this vIRQ? I''m asking because, while debugging a problem that required to add some printk()s that could temporarily issue at a high rate, I ran into the situation that this extra output prevented guest/dom0 boot from making any progress. As I then realized this was due to the tasklet_schedule() called from inside the console handling code, which resulted in

Is there any real user for this vIRQ? I''m asking because, while debugging a problem that required to add some printk()s that could temporarily issue at a high rate, I ran into the situation that this extra output prevented guest/dom0 boot from making any progress. As I then realized this was due to the tasklet_schedule() called from inside the console handling code, which resulted in

Next question:- eth0            8000.001c2596e32b       no              peth0 pan0            8000.000000000000       no virbr0          8000.000000000000       yes Presence virbr0 in report seems strange. Direct port  Xen 3.4.2  to F11 doesn''t install daemon libvirtd ( bridge virbr0 ) , unless you wrote xen-3.4.2-(x).fc12.src.rpm  yourself. So , from where bridge virbr0 comes 

I was able to get login prompt ( commit 7c62209cde5b13b81685e79b2f9e3757e293aef1 ) first time via serial console:- title Xen 3.4.1  Fedora 12 Serial (2.6.31-rc8 ) (/dev/sdb1)   root (hd1,0)   kernel /xen-3.4.1.gz dom0_mem=1024M loglvl=all guest_loglvl=all com1=19200,8n1 console=com1   module /vmlinuz-2.6.31-rc8 ro root=/dev/mapper/vg_fdr12-lv_root console=hvc0 earlyprintk=xen   module

Dear *, I''m more used to work with RedHat like OSes. Still, I did not denied the request from a user who wants a domU based on ubunto. I usually use virt-install to do the job, with a script similar to this one: #!/bin/sh BASE=SL-4.7-i386-pv \ virt-install --nographics \ --nonsparse \ --paravirt \ --noreboot \

Previous 2.6.31-rc8 kernel was built on F11 and installed with modules on F12. Current kernel has been built on F12 (2.6.31-0.204.rc9.fc12.x86_64) and installed on F12 before loading under Xen 3.4.1. Dmesg log looks similar to Michael Yuong''s ''rc7.git4''  kernel for F12. Boris. --- On Tue, 9/8/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Boris