similar to: getting form values using link_to_remote

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "getting form values using link_to_remote"

2009 Aug 21
0
[LLVMdev] How to force MemoryDependenceAnalysis to run on original module
On Aug 21, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Marc Brünink wrote: >> This isn't really possible. The issue is that MemDep doesn't just >> "analyze your function". It is designed to be as lazy as possible, >> which means that it only does analysis when a query is performed. >> This >> means that if you have MemDep->Pass1->Pass2 and Pass2 uses MemDep
2009 Aug 21
2
[LLVMdev] How to force MemoryDependenceAnalysis to run on original module
Chris Lattner schrieb: > On Aug 21, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Marc Brünink wrote: >>> This isn't really possible. The issue is that MemDep doesn't just >>> "analyze your function". It is designed to be as lazy as possible, >>> which means that it only does analysis when a query is performed. This >>> means that if you have
2009 Aug 21
0
[LLVMdev] How to force MemoryDependenceAnalysis to run on original module
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Marc Brünink<marc at bruenink.de> wrote: >>> actually my problem is easier. So I still have hope that it is possible: >>> >>> MemDep->Pass1->Pass2 >>> >>> Pass1 uses MemDep. Pass2 only uses Pass1. Eventually, Pass2 changes the >>> code. Unfortunately, non-local dependencies of MemDep might point to
2011 May 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.9 pass manager asserts "Unable to handle Pass that requires lower level Analysis pass"
Hi, I am trying to write an LLVM project, using LLVM 2.9. My passes are defined as follows, where the Pass2 requires Pass1. namespace llvm { class BaseClass : public ModulePass { // Name for printing const char* printname; protected: BaseClass(char id, const char* name) : ModulePass(id),printname(name){ } }; class Pass1 : public BaseClass { public: static char ID; Pass1() :
2009 Aug 21
2
[LLVMdev] How to force MemoryDependenceAnalysis to run on original module
Chris Lattner schrieb: > > On Aug 20, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Marc Brünink wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I do have a FunctionPass that does change the code. This FunctionPass >> requires another FunctionPass which performs all the necessary analyses. >> This AnalysisPass again requires MemoryDependenceAnalysis. >> >> The problem is, that I would like
2010 Jul 06
0
[LLVMdev] runtime assert failure when trying to obtain analysis pass info within a transformation pass
I am having problems passing analysis results to transformation passes, so I reduced my testcase into the following bare bone: Pass1: simple FunctionPass, counting functions Pass2: transformation pass, for now, just trying to obtain a reference of Pass1 using AU.getAnalysis<Pass1>() inside its runOnFunction(). When I run it, I get the following runtime error: opt -load
2007 Dec 17
1
[LLVMdev] Bug 1868: Specifying Pass Orderings
Devang Patel wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2007, at 2:01 PM, John Criswell wrote: > >> Devang Patel wrote: >>> >>> On Dec 17, 2007, at 1:47 PM, John Criswell wrote: >>> >>>> Dear Devang Patel, >>>> >>>> In response to your comment on bug 1868, how do I get BottomPass to >>>> requires Pass2 before Pass1? Is it by
2012 Jun 26
0
[LLVMdev] Does anaysis group only contain passes?
On 6/25/12 8:55 PM, Thomson wrote: > Thanks, John. > > This sounds reasonable that the analysis group just provides an > interface to its implementors (pass). Then I have another question, is > it allowed to specify multiple pass in the same analysis group in the > command line for opt? Yes, you can do that. Using multiple analysis passes that belong to the same group may
2009 Aug 20
0
[LLVMdev] How to force MemoryDependenceAnalysis to run on original module
On Aug 20, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Marc Brünink wrote: > Hi, > > I do have a FunctionPass that does change the code. This FunctionPass > requires another FunctionPass which performs all the necessary > analyses. > This AnalysisPass again requires MemoryDependenceAnalysis. > > The problem is, that I would like MemoryDependenceAnalysis to run on > the > unaltered
2004 Aug 06
1
icecast and shout
Hello, I have icecast runnig I think. I made enqripted password with makepasswd -crypt and then I got pass1 og pass2. As I understand it the pass1 is a uncripted password and pass2 encrypted. I put the pass2 in to the /etc/icecast/icecast.conf and then started it with icecast -p pass1 Then i put pass2 in to the /etc/icecast/shout.conf I have tried all variations about having the password
2010 Oct 17
2
Error with Connecting Two Asterisk BOX with IAX
Hello, I'm trying to conect two 1.6.2.13 Asterisk server with IAX. This is my configuration: Asterisk A: iax.conf register => coiax:pass1 at 69.164.207.166 [smiax] type=friend host=dynamic trunk=yes secret=pass2 context=phones deny=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 permit=69.164.207.166/255.255.255.255 qualify=yes Console: iax2 registry 69.164.207.166:4569 N coiax 69.164.197.105:4569
2003 Jun 26
2
Is there something sppecial about pass4 ?
Machine is 4.8-STABLE smaug# camcontrol devlist <COMPAQ BD009122BA 3B07> at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,da0) <COMPAQ BD009122C6 B016> at scbus0 target 1 lun 0 (pass1,da1) <COMPAQ BD009122BA 3B07> at scbus0 target 2 lun 0 (pass2,da2) <COMPAQ BD00962373 BCJE> at scbus0 target 3 lun 0 (pass3,da3) <IBM IC35L018UCPR15-0 S70H>
2009 Aug 26
1
2 Asterisk boxes : 1 can see the other, not vica versa
Asterisk-server 1 : register => hostedasterisk:pass1 at domain2.biz [BOX-YOCAN] type=user ; incoming from YOCAN... auth=rsa inkeys=Key ; pub key of user secret=XXX ; pass2 of YOCAN context=from-BOX-YOCAN ; incoming from YOCAN trunk=yes transfer=no qualify=yes [BOX-YOCAN] type=peer ; outgoing to YOCAN... host=dynamic ; registers auth=rsa outkey=kEy ; private secret key
2012 May 14
1
undefined method `parse' for String:Class
Hi, I use a script called : add_admin.rake When i execute this : ''rake -s -f Rakefile mailserv:add_admin --trace i have this error : ** Invoke mailserv:add_admin (first_time) ** Invoke environment (first_time) ** Execute environment ** Execute mailserv:add_admin rake aborted! undefined method `parse'' for String:Class
2010 Feb 21
1
[LLVMdev] patch: purdy colours for makefiles
Here is a patch to add colour to build output (make) for LLVM sources. Feedback and ideas welcome. The patch replaces $(Echo) usage in some key rules in Makefile.rules with $(Banner) which invokes a new script utils/make-banner.sh which is capable of adding appropriate ANSI escape sequences. step1: apply patch step2: chmod 755 utils/make-banner.sh step3: export MAKE_BANNER_ANSI=1 Next, you must
2015 Feb 24
2
[LLVMdev] Accessing a custom defined llvm pass
Hello all, I have written one pass to collect information about specific calls in an llvm IR file and am not trying to reference the results from the first pass in a second pass. What is the correct way to reference an additional custom pass in LLVM? At the moment the project is set up under the lib/Transforms directory in source and has the current layout: Thresholds/ include/
2006 Jan 11
0
AJAX: link_to_remote problem
I use: <%= link_to_remote("Update", :update => ''mydiv'', :url => { :action => :create, :host => ''rails'' }) %> which generates the following: <a href="#" onclick="new Ajax.Updater(''mydiv'', ''/account/create'', {asynchronous:true, evalScripts:true}); return
2002 May 21
4
Samba+PDC+LDAP (add user script + unix passwd sync) Can't call perl script
Hi, i've compiled samba 2.2.4 on a Redhat 7.1 machine, working with openldap 2.0.23. I also downloaded smbldap-tools from IDEALX which i fixed myself to fit my needs. Everything work very fine when running the scripts in shell mode... but! In smb.conf : ============= add user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd.pl -w %u This line don't work and it should, because when running
2007 Dec 17
3
[LLVMdev] Bug 1868: Specifying Pass Orderings
Dear Devang Patel, In response to your comment on bug 1868, how do I get BottomPass to requires Pass2 before Pass1? Is it by reversing the order of the calls to AU.addRequired()? -- John T. -- John T. Criswell jcriswel at bigw.org "It's today!" said Piglet. "My favorite day," said Pooh.
2004 Nov 18
3
[LLVMdev] A few beginner level questions..
1. If we run a few passes in a sequence ..is the bytecode file transformed after each pass in sequence i.e if we have a) opt -pass1 -pass2 -pass3 < in.bc > out.bc b)opt -pass1 -pass2 < in.bc > tmp.bc opt -pass3 < tmp.bc > out.bc are the above two equivalent ? what I basically want is to run my pass on an optimised bytecode , so should i optimize it and get a new bytecode