similar to: pinning CPU affinity

If you compile this with optimizations, then the 'canary()' function should be totally inlined into the 'main()' function. In that case, the cost of the stack protectors will be very small compared to the loop. -bw On Mar 9, 2012, at 2:52 AM, Job Noorman <jobnoorman at gmail.com> wrote: > I have a question about the performance of the implementation of the stack >

On 7/26/11 5:37 PM, Xueying ZHANG wrote: > Hi John, > > Thanks for your reply! I'm CC'ing this to the list in case anyone knows why you're seeing this behavior. > > Now, I know the different between llvm.returnaddress(0) and > llvm.returnaddress(1). I modify the StackPortector.cpp and I just want > to get value of the return address stored on the stack. >

I have a question about the performance of the implementation of the stack protector in LLVM. Consider the following C program: ===== void canary() { char buf[20]; buf[0]++; } int main() { int i; for (i = 0; i < 1000000000; ++i) canary(); return 0; } ===== This should definately run slower when stack protection is enabled, right? I have measured the runtime of

Hi all, I am master student in Edinburgh, UK. I am doing my MSc project with LLVM compiler and I have to modify LLVM to implement the StackGuard with a XOR random Canary. However, I am not familiar with LLVM. My problem is that I want to XOR the random canary word with the return address which are both 32 bits. I found a method called SimplifyXorInst(Value *, Value *, const TargetData

All, I just noticed this in my logs, and am rather lost as to what module it pertains to. I would assume pseudo-realtime priority for the process, but I am looking for a little confirmation from the group: [Apr 28 12:28:36] WARNING[20773] asterisk.c: The canary is no more. He has ceased to be! He's expired and gone to meet his maker! He's a stiff! Bereft of life, he rests in

Hi all, I want to implement the Xor random canary, so I have to get the return address in the prologue and epilogue of the function. In the prologue of the function, before I insert into the canary on the stack, I can get the return address by: ConstantInt* ci = llvm::ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt32Ty(RI->getContext()), 0); Value* Args1[] = {ci}; CallInst* callInst =

People, Anybody knows what mean this message in my CLI: [Apr 1 16:58:34] WARNING[3845]: asterisk.c:3050 canary_thread: The canary is no more. He has ceased to be! He's expired and gone to meet his maker! He's a stiff! Bereft of life, he rests in peace. His metabolic processes are now history! He's off the twig! He's kicked the bucket. He's shuffled off his mortal

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Martin J. O'Riordan via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I am trying to implement stack probes for our SHAVE target, and I see that > the compiler injects references to ‘__stack_chk_guard’ and > ‘__stack_chk_fail’. The code that gets generated is horribly wrong, but in > order to understand how to fix it I was wondering if

Hi all, I am master student in Edinburgh, UK. I am doing my MSc project with LLVM compiler and I have to modify LLVM to implement the StackGuard with a XOR random Canary. However, I am not familiar with LLVM. My problem is that I want to XOR the random canary word with the return address which are both 32 bits. I found a method called SimplifyXorInst(Value *, Value *, const TargetData

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Make sure segments are properly set up before setting up an IDT and doing anything that might cause a #VC exception. This is later needed for early exception handling. Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> --- arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S | 52 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------- CISTI'2016 Workshops Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain June 15 - 18, 2016 http://www.aisti.eu/cisti2016/index.php/es/xpto ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Introduction ------------ We are pleased to invite the academic and business community to submit their papers to

----------------------------------------------------------------------------- CISTI'2016 Workshops Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain June 15 - 18, 2016 http://www.aisti.eu/cisti2016/index.php/es/xpto ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Introduction ------------ We are pleased to invite the academic and business community to submit their papers to

-- -------------------------------- CISTI'2016 - 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies June 15 - 18, 2016, Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain http://www.aisti.eu/cisti2016/index.php/en ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ We are pleased to invite the academic and

-- -------------------------------- CISTI'2016 - 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies June 15 - 18, 2016, Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain http://www.aisti.eu/cisti2016/index.php/en ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ We are pleased to invite the academic and

Hi all, How to XOR the return address on the stack with a canary word both are 32 bits? Is there a method to implement it? Thank you. Ying -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

- --- CISTI'2016 - 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies June 15 18, 2016, Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain http://www.aisti.eu/cisti2016/index.php/en ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ We are pleased to invite the academic and business community to submit

- --- CISTI'2016 - 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies June 15 18, 2016, Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain http://www.aisti.eu/cisti2016/index.php/en ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ We are pleased to invite the academic and business community to submit

Apologies if you received multiple copies of this message. =============================================================== CALL FOR PAPERS 3rd Workshop on Virtualization in High-Performance Cluster and Grid Computing (VHPC'08) as part of Euro-Par 2008, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Island, Spain =============================================================== Date: August 26-29,

Apologies if you received multiple copies of this message. =============================================================== CALL FOR PAPERS 3rd Workshop on Virtualization in High-Performance Cluster and Grid Computing (VHPC'08) as part of Euro-Par 2008, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Island, Spain =============================================================== Date: August 26-29,

John Criswell wrote: > If you're interested in SAFECode, the first step is to get SAFECode > working with a newer version of LLVM. A Master's student did some > work on this last summer with LLVM 3.7 but didn't finish. It would > now need to be updated to LLVM 3.8 (though I suppose a completed LLVM > 3.7 port would be fine with me). > > After that, there are