similar to: ARP problems with xen 4.0 with pvops kernel

I have CentOS 7 host. Two guests on bridge network setup by GUI and virt-manager. 1 CentOS 8 guest 1 Win 10 guest Both cannot access the host. They can other machines on the network. Guests can access the internet just not the host. I used virt-manager GUi to set up everything. Selected the eth0:macvtap and Bridge. I "desire" bridge network. If I select something else I get access to

Hi, I have Xen 3.0.3 installed on CentOS 5.5 with 2 paravirtualized domU''s configured to use the default bridge networking and am having networking issues. If I boot the computer fresh I am able to ping dom0 and can SSH into it and start the domU''s. The following ping snippet demonstrates the problem. The first group of "Destination Host Unreachable" is while the

Hi. I have a machine with a local DHCP server and a couple of virtual networks and I've configured the server for each virtual interface, so that I would be able to install VMs on the corresponding subnets using PXE. The problem is that the two DHCP servers (my local server and dnsmasq) are conflicting with each other causing the boot process to either fails or takes ages untill a VM can

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:05:19AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: >On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:26:59AM -0400, Travis S. Johnson wrote: >>Hello, >> >>I came across an interesting problem in my home lab a few weeks ago as I'm >>prepping for my RHCE exam using Michael Jang study guide. I've been at this >>for days now, and I still can't wrap my head around

Hello, I came across an interesting problem in my home lab a few weeks ago as I'm prepping for my RHCE exam using Michael Jang study guide. I've been at this for days now, and I still can't wrap my head around how two or more virtual networks in default NAT configuration are even allowed to communicate with each other despite what the libvirt documentation said. Here's the

Hi everyone. Those are the iptables forwarding rules associated with the two virtual networks on my machine: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -A FORWARD -d 192.168.100.0/24 -o virbr1 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -s 192.168.100.0/24 -i virbr1 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i virbr1 -o virbr1 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -o

>Sorry, have to correct myself. Had to much to do today on OpenShift. >There is no Docker involved in what we discuss. The firewall rules for >the host bridge devices get created by libvirtd. Thanks I was using iptables and not converted to firewalld. I am doing so now. Will I need to delete the VM and re-add it ? I am rebooting first. Jerry

Hi all, I have 3 guests (2-RHEL4 and 1 RHEL6) and have some issues regarding networking between them. The 2 RHEL4 system's use default bridge virbr0 and get ip's of range 192.168.122.0/24 (192.168.122.207, 192.168.122.167) I created another bridge (virbr1) with NAT forwarding (no dhcp). The network i choose was 192.168.100.0/24. And the third system (RHEL6) was assigned static ip-addres

Hi, I haven't been to find this (NetworkManager) change documented. On: CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core) $ /bin/nmcli con NAME UUID TYPE DEVICE ens32 7629e52d-bd42-4cd5-a424-8c58e7e0bf37 802-3-ethernet ens32 On: CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (Core) $ /bin/nmcli con NAME UUID TYPE

Hello! Has anybody experienced network latency problems with combination of Windows 7, GPLPV drivers and RDP connection? Any Windows pop-up message(such as "command not found" error message in "Run command:" dialog, or dividing by zero in windows calc) causes a short freeze of RDP session and looks like that from dom0: PING 192.168.44.65 (192.168.44.65) 56(84) bytes of data.

I'm looking for some information regarding the interaction of KVM, VLANs, firewalld, and the kernel's forwarding configuration. I would appreciate input especially from anyone already running a similar configuration in production. In short, I'm trying to figure out if a current configuration is inadvertently opening up traffic across network segments. On earlier versions of CentOS

The domU is using pygrub to boot its own 2.6.18.8-xen kernel. It can be booted successfully under 2.6.18.8-xen dom0 and xen 3.3.1. However when upgrade dom0 to 2.6.32.15 and xen 4.0.1-rc3-pre, the domU can not boot with tapdisk. I am wondering it is something related to the blktap driver. *When using tap:aio:* PATH/disk.img in domU disk configuration, the boot process hanged at a prompt: XENBUS:

The domU is using pygrub to boot its own 2.6.18.8-xen kernel. It can be booted successfully under 2.6.18.8-xen dom0 and xen 3.3.1. However when upgrade dom0 to 2.6.32.15 and xen 4.0.1-rc3-pre, the domU can not boot with tapdisk. I am wondering it is something related to the blktap driver. *When using tap:aio:* PATH/disk.img in domU disk configuration, the boot process hanged at a prompt: XENBUS:

Hello everybody. I could not find an answer to my problem in the archive. (But that may just be me :-) ) I have a problem with proxy arp and connection from loc (localnet) and from the firewall. Works fine from internet to dmz / proxy arp and vise versa. I have a feeling the solution is simple, but I''m no guru in Linux routing etc. The problem seems to be the routing setup. loc -

hi, On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 3:40?PM Michal Pr?vozn?k <mprivozn at redhat.com> wrote: > On 3/19/23 20:21, Natxo Asenjo wrote: > > hi, > > > > I have configured a routed network on my laptop with a ipv6 subnet and > > dnsmasq is handing out ipv6 addresses to my vms and it works really wel, > > but finding out which ips have been used is not as easy as with

In usr/src/uts/common/xen/io/xnbu.c, function xnbu_cksum_from_peer() http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/xen/io/xnbu.c#110 we have this: if ((flags & NETTXF_csum_blank) != 0) { /* * The checksum is blank. We must fill it in here. */ mp = xnb_process_cksum_flags(xnbp, mp, 0);

Hello all, I’m currently trying to figure out how to forward ports to guests that are on a NAT Network. I have followed the directions on https://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking under the “Forwarding Incoming Connections” Section and get connection refused when attempting to connect. System: Ubuntu Server 18.04.1 Virsh / LibVirtd Version: 4.0.0 Here’s the contents of /etc/libvirt/hooks/qemu  

I''ve got a linux router pushing 600-1000 pppoe connections through it. I''m getting a screen error "Neighbor Table Overflow" after this box has been up for between 1 week and 1 month. When this is happening, routing slows to a crawl if at all. Then dies. I''ve added: # Added to stop "neighbor table overflow" messages in the kernel

On 3/19/23 20:21, Natxo Asenjo wrote: > hi, > > I have configured a routed network on my laptop with a ipv6 subnet and > dnsmasq is handing out ipv6 addresses to my vms and it works really wel, > but finding out which ips have been used is not as easy as with ipv4. > > [root at lenovo ~]# virsh domifaddr --domain wec --source lease > ?Name ? ? ? MAC address ? ? ? ?

> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:07 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I have a patch that I think may help your situation of syslinux.efi >> being unable to load ldlinux.e64/ldlinux.e32 (though I don't know if >> any of you are using an EFI ia32 platform). >> >> The basics are that we try to enable UseDefaultAddress as it helps >>