similar to: xen4.0 debian vlan config

I couldn''t find anyone who had actually made it work via google so I guess I''ll ask here. My setup is a VPN point to point link. The VPN is a modified version of Openvpn where I''m using zlib compression to improve the compression a bit. The goal is to shape traffic coming from a routing server through the vpn to the endpoint of the vpn and in such a way maximize the

Hi, I am configuring some servers in a high availability setup. The servers are connected to two switches with two LAN cards in each server. The two switches are connected directly to each other. The servers are configured to bridge eth0 and eth1 with spanning tree. Usually this makes sure eth1 is disabled, unless something happens to eth0. This way I can have one IP address on each server. Now

Hi I cant start a hvm domU with more than 3 nic's configured... why? it is a bug? With previous versions it was possible... here the config - it is an opnsense (openbsd) hvm domU: name = "fenrir.chao5.int" uuid = "7aedcd03-54e8-4055-8d1b-37dd34194859" maxmem = 2048 memory = 2048 loader = '/usr/lib64/xen/boot/hvmloader' type = "hvm" vcpus = 2

Hi libvirt 5.2.0 should support maxGrantFrames setting for xen (changelog). I get ever an error if I use it in the config: <domain type='xen'> <name>satan.chao5.int</name> <uuid>f1f96b1c-fb75-4707-afb7-604d696d29cc</uuid> <memory unit='KiB'>3145728</memory> <currentMemory unit='KiB'>3145728</currentMemory>

Hello list, I've posted here about this before, but I realise that it may have been assumed that the bridged vlans simply put a switch port in a blocking state and left my question ignored. So to recap. I have two tg3 interfaces named 'in' and 'out' and a bridge named 'br0' My vlan trunk is on the 'in' side of the network, and set as in.2, in.3 ... The

Hi all, i need config xen with this ___________ __________ |VM1 |----------------bridge1-------------------| | |__________ | | | ____________ | |-----BALBLA |VM2 |

I''m playing around with VLAN''s and I have a VLAN capable (layer 2) smart switch. I see a steady stream of martians in the logfile if I have the routefilter option set on the loc zone interfaces in /etc/shorewall/interfaces. I have two interfaces in the loc zone, eth1 and vlan2 respectively. vlan2 is an 802.1q trunk going towards the switch. Is this the expected behavior in

Hi Rahul, If you're certain that your problem isn't as Stephen suggested, you might want to have a look at this: --- (From http://ebtables.sourceforge.net/brnf-faq.html <http://ebtables.sourceforge.net/brnf-faq.html> ) How do I let vlan-tagged traffic go through a vlan bridge port and the other traffic through a non-vlan bridge port? Suppose eth0 and eth0.15 are ports of br0.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-03 16:49 ------- We haven't seen this

I''ve just discovered that I do not have access to the remote gateways for a set of IPsec tunnels to remote networks. This prevents me from changing the routing table on those gateways. I need "roadwarrior" systems connecting to me local network using OpenVPN (tun) to be able to access those systems. Since the remote gateways don''t know about 10.100.1.0/24, where my

HTB performance improvement Hi all ! i''m looking at the performance of the HTB algorithm/implementation because i would like more packets/sec !! this is the scenario of the performance test: i''m using an embedded system with: SPEED CPU: 399,999 MHz RAM: 128 MByte FLASH: 16 MByte EEPROM: 8Kbyte PROCESSOR MPC8272 a lan to lan 10/100 and in particular we are sending

hello. i have following setup: a machine (winChip 200mhz cpu, 32mb ram, linux 2.4.28) acting like a bridge with 2 interfaces (eth0 - to our ISP, eth1 - to our network) machine does not have any IP there is a 802.1q vlan eth0.2 eth0.2 and eth1 are bridged in br0 i have one 4mbit link which i share with my friend, i have 3mbit and he has 1mbit all our IP addresses are public and we have the

Hello... I have one 2Mbit WAN interfaces and two vlan LAN interfaces - vlan2 and vlan3. I''d like to limit bandwidth something like this: rate 1Mbit ceil 2Mbit for vlan2 and rate 1Mbit ceil 2Mbit for vlan3 with possibility to borrow bandwidth between vlan2 and vlan3. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Is it possible to do in any way? regards, -- Michal

I have a zone "rw" defined as tun0 in interfaces. From that zone, pings to zone "loc" succeed but pings to remote networks (On IPsec VPNs) are rejected in the all2all chain. From my point of view, these pings should be in the rw2cctc chain. (rw to cctc is ACCEPTed in policy.) I must have a hole in my config, where would it be? Thanks, A.

Hi to the ML. I''m new to VLAN configuration, and combining it to XEN is a bit difficult. I want to use VLAN because it''s possible to "arping" from a domU to an other, and VLAN looks like; the only solution to prevent that. May be I''m wrong if someone got a solution, I may be interrested. I''ve also tryed ebtables, but nothing to prevent arp

I am trying to setup GRE between two CentOS 4.5 boxes. I have tried several variations of what''s listed below, but none of them work. box1: modprobe ip_gre ip link set gre0 up ip tunnel add gretun mode gre local 66.1.1.161 remote 66.1.2.161 ttl 20 dev eth0 ip addr add dev gretun 10.253.253.1 peer 10.253.253.2/24 ip link set dev gretun up ip route add 10.2.0.0/16 via 10.253.253.2 box2:

I'm looking for some information regarding the interaction of KVM, VLANs, firewalld, and the kernel's forwarding configuration. I would appreciate input especially from anyone already running a similar configuration in production. In short, I'm trying to figure out if a current configuration is inadvertently opening up traffic across network segments. On earlier versions of CentOS

Hello all, We have just concluded a very drawn out test of our domain that is having some trust relationship problems with Windows 7 desktops. Here is a breakdown of our setup: roark PDC running samba 3.4.7 (also has OpenLDAP) on VLAN 2 archives3 BDC running samba 3.4.7 (also has OpenLDAP) on VLAN2 arrowhead BDC "home server" running samba 3.4.3 on VLAN 9 archives4 BDC

Hi, this is my Linux Box ---------------------------- LAN 1 -----|--eth1 <---br1--->eth0.1 | | \ | | eth0--|----- 802.1q tagged 1 Mbps link | / | LAN 2 -----|--eth2 <---br2--->eth0.2 | ---------------------------- I have to bridge the 2 lans

Hello all, I have a CentOS box that has a NIC (eth0) on which I defined 4 VLAN's (counting the NIC itself): eth0, eth0.1, eth0.2 and eht0.3. Initially the Cisco switch was not partitioned into VLAN's which means that the only VLAN running on it was the default one (VLAN 1). I have then played with VLAN's a bit on the switch and at this point have two: VLAN 1 (which is default and can