similar to: Re: Re: Xen-4 PVUSB kernel bug / Xenlinux 2.6.32

This adds a leak decoder callback so that kmem_cache_destroy() can use to generate debugging output for the allocated objects. Callers like btrfs are using their own leak tracking which will manage allocated objects in a list(or something else), this does indeed the same thing as what slab does. So adding a callback for leak tracking can avoid this as well as runtime overhead. Signed-off-by:

This adds a leak decoder callback so that slab destruction can use to generate debugging output for the allocated objects. Callers like btrfs are using their own leak tracking which will manage allocated objects in a list(or something else), this does indeed the same thing as what slab does. So adding a callback for leak tracking can avoid this as well as runtime overhead. (The idea is from

On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/19/2017 09:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: >>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >>>> Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and kernel-4.9.37-29.el6, >>>> with the one config file change) working for everyone: >>>>

On Thu, 20 Jul 2017, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 07/20/2017 05:31 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >>> On 07/19/2017 09:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Are the

On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 12:33:01 -0400 (EDT) Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, 24 Apr 2018, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Tue 24-04-18 11:30:40, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Apr 2018, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon 23-04-18 20:25:15, Mikulas Patocka wrote: >

Hi, I'm building a test asterisk server and building the latest kernel I got to wonder if there are any specific recommendations about schedulers and so forth for optimum performance. There are a few areas that raise questions in my mind and I wonder if anyone has any opinions/comments on which settings are most suitable for use with asterisk: SLAB Allocator (SLAB or SLUB?) Tickless

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:57:57AM -0700, James Jones wrote: > Accept the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK() > family of modifiers to handle broken userspace > Xorg modesetting and Mesa drivers. > > Tested with Xorg 1.20 modesetting driver, > weston at c46c70dac84a4b3030cd05b380f9f410536690fc, > gnome & KDE wayland desktops from Ubuntu 18.04, > and sway 1.5 > >

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51018 Bug #: 51018 Summary: kernel >=3.4.0: nouveau triggers kernel BUG in slub.c on GTX 560 Ti Classification: Unclassified Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal

Hello, We have a system which creates thousands of regression/classification models and in cases where we have only one input variable NaiveBayes throws an error. Maybe I am mistaken and I shouldn't expect to have a model with only one input variable. We use R version 2.6.0 (2007-10-03). We use caret (v4.1.19), but have tested similar code with klaR (v.0.5.8), because caret relies on

Hi ! Right now I am learning to use svm functions available in R and trying to use these function with given example. I was stuck with svmlight function which is available in klaR package. Any help would be appreciated regarding this function. 1. I am unable to use svmlight( ) which is available in package: klaR. Although I have downloaded klaR_0.6-3 package from

Hello, My system died last night apparently due to OOM conditions. Note that I don't have any swap set up, but my understanding is that this is not required. The full log is at: http://pastebin.com/YCYUXWvV. It was in my messages, so I guess the system took a bit to die completely. nouveau is somewhat implicated, as it is the first thing that hits an allocation failure in nouveau_vm_create,

Hi, I run R 2.10.1 under ubuntu 10.04 LTS (Lucid Lynx) and klaR version 0.6-4. I compute a model over a 2 classes dataset (composed of 700 examples). To that aim, I use the function NaiveBayes provided in the package klaR. When I then use the prediction function : predict(my_model, new_data). I get the following warning : "In FUN(1:747[[747L]], ...) : Numerical 0 probability with

On 05/12/2011 06:50 PM, Longguang Yue wrote: > > Thank you first of all > > totally, there are 5 kinds of error occur. > > Spinlock leads to cpu lockup, o2net modules panic, kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:2969, BUG unable to handle kernel paging request at addr > > My environment: kernel-2.6.32.23 + xen + ocfs2(1.5) > > Thanks again. > This looks like the deadlock as

On 07/20/2017 03:14 PM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jul 2017, Kevin Stange wrote: > >> On 07/20/2017 05:31 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >>>> On 07/19/2017 09:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>> On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 17 Jul

On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> > > I will happily create a test kernel with SLAB .. what is your config > file diff? I have just choosed SLAB allocator in menuconfig. It has implied several other internal configurations changes. Overall differencess (config file patch) is in attachment. But my considerations about compiled in PATA etc., instead of modules, remain

On 07/20/2017 03:14 PM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jul 2017, Kevin Stange wrote: > >> On 07/20/2017 05:31 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >>>> On 07/19/2017 09:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>> On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 17 Jul

On 07/20/2017 05:31 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 07/19/2017 09:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: >>>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> >>>>> Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and >>>>>

Dear All, Would you please tell me how to display the sample No. on the map ? ---Below commands don't display the sample No.(from 1 to 150).--- library(som) library(klaR) iris.som3 <- som(iris[,1:4], xdim = 14,ydim = 6) library(klaR); opar<- par(xpd = NA) shardsplot(iris.som3, data.or = iris,label = TRUE) legend(3.5,14.3, col = rainbow(3), xjust =0.5, yjust = 0,legend =

On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and kernel-4.9.37-29.el6, >> with the one config file change) working for everyone: >> >> (turn off: CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM) > > Hello. > Maybe it's not the most appropriate thread or time, but I have been >

This doesn't look related. -James On 7/17/20 2:30 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:57:57AM -0700, James Jones wrote: >> Accept the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK() >> family of modifiers to handle broken userspace >> Xorg modesetting and Mesa drivers. >> >> Tested with Xorg 1.20 modesetting driver, >> weston at