similar to: Input from xen hosting providers?

On a fresh reboot free: total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 3371340 448156 2923184 0 5328 77840 ---------- top: Mem: 3371340k total, 449044k used, 2922296k free, 5344k buffers ---------- xentop - 01:44:00 Xen 3.4.3-rc4-pre 1 domains: 1 running, 0 blocked, 0 paused, 0 crashed, 0 dying, 0 shutdown Mem: 4160828k total, 4022996k used, 137832k free CPUs: 4

Oye 3 days on this now, my head hurts. I have spent what seems like 40 hours in the last 3 or 4 days reading, and I realize xen is in the middle of this transition of getting into mainline kernel, issues with dom0 etc etc. Ok, so i have come across a few howtos/tutorials on installing xen dom0 kernel, using git to download a patched? kernel tree, and getting xen source from mercurial. Below is my

On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 17:56 +0100, Jonas Meurer wrote: [...] > So the question is: why does the VM run stable on xen1 while it > crashes all the time on xen2. If I compare xen1 and xen2, only > real difference is mainboard (Supermicro X8 on xen1; Supermicro > X9 on xen2) and CPU (Xeon L5939 on xen1; E5-2609 on xen2) > > As a next step I'll put the harddisks into another

Gang, ???? I run several KVM host machines.? Due to updates, maintenance, and unexpected reboots sometime host machines are restarted.? I can easily envision a scenario where HostX needs some critical packages updated or is acting up.? I migrate guest0, guest1, guest2 etc. from HostX to HostY.? Then, in either a planned (i.e. scheduled maintenance) or unplanned (i.e. unplanned reboot) event

In my system I''d like to be able to share one disk among multiple xen quests and boot them up using this shared disk. Is it possible to set a flag somewhere to avoid the following error. # xm create guest2 kernel="/TMP/vmlinuz" ramdisk=/TMP/initrd.img bootloader="" extra=rescue Using config file "./guest2". Error: The uname "/dev/sdz" is already

Lets say you had 4 servers and you wanted to setup replicate and distribute. What methoid would be better: server sdb1 xen0 brick0 xen1 mirror0 xen2 brick1 xen3 mirror1 replicate block0 - brick0 mirror0 replicate block1 - brick1 mirror1 distribute unify - block0 block1 or server sdb1 sdb2 xen0 brick0 mirror3 xen1 brick1 mirror0 xen2 brick2 mirror1 xen3 brick3 mirror2 replicate block0 -

And some more information ... Am 2014-10-13 12:04, schrieb Jonas Meurer: > Am 2014-08-19 12:26, schrieb Jonas Meurer: >> I encounter kernel crashes on an up-to-date Debian/Wheezy Xen domU >> with the >> stock kernel. The dom0 runs the same linux kernel and >> xen/4.1.4-3+deb7u1. > > the bug is still reproducible with the latest kernel and Xen packages >

Hi folks, Host - Debian Etch Guests - Debian Etch. Performed following steps to create duplicate guest, a mail server. 1) # cp /etc/xen/guest-1.cfg /etc/xen/guest-2.cfg edit guest-2.cfg changing the settings of:- disk = [''file:/vserver/domains/guest-2_directory/disk.img,hda1,w'', ''file:/vserver/domains/guest-2_directory/swap.img,hda2,w''] # Hostname name

Hello people, libvirtd (libvirt) 1.0.5.2 virsh 1.0.5.2 virt-manager 0.10.0 Host: Linux localhost 3.9.8-300.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jun 27 19:24:23 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Guest1: Linux localhost 3.9.8-300.fc19.i686.PAE #1 SMP Thu Jun 27 19:29:30 UTC 2013 i686 (none) Guest2: Linux localhost 3.9.8-300.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jun 27 19:24:23 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

I just tried to setup another domain on a server running 1 domain. When i try to start the domain it gives me an error Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Backend device not found. The entry in my xen config file for the disks is disk = [''phy:/dev/xen001/xen2-fun,sda1,w'',''phy:/dev/xen001/xen2-fun-swap,sda2,w''] Looking at /var/log/xend.log, i found

Hey again, Am 2014-08-19 12:26, schrieb Jonas Meurer: > I encounter kernel crashes on an up-to-date Debian/Wheezy Xen domU with > the > stock kernel. The dom0 runs the same linux kernel and > xen/4.1.4-3+deb7u1. the bug is still reproducible with the latest kernel and Xen packages from Debian Wheezy. Unfortunately it seems like a corner case, somehow related to the hardware

Hi, i wont separate drbd traffic in domU to eth1 interface. What is the best way to do that? I think about make eth1 nic passthrough to my domU. Can i expect some problems with this configuration? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

I'm not quite sure whether this is a plain browsing problem, or a wins problems, or ... I had wins running on one machine (Samba(2.0.5a)/SCO Unix), but my main file server on another (Samba (2.2.1a)/Linux). I moved the wins support to the Linux server, and at the same time I made the Linux server the Domain Master Browser, but now some devices have dissapeared from the network. The devices

On 03.07.2013 13:43, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 01:25:21PM +0200, poma wrote: >> Hello people, >> >> libvirtd (libvirt) 1.0.5.2 >> virsh 1.0.5.2 >> virt-manager 0.10.0 >> >> Host: >> Linux localhost 3.9.8-300.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jun 27 19:24:23 UTC >> 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> Guest1: >>

I have set-up xen on my Intel quad core server. Now running different experiment to measure network throughput in virtualized environment. these are some of the results: Netperf-4.5 results for inter-domain communication. Sr.No.              Client               Server               Time(sec)        Throughput(Mbps)    1                   Guest-1              Dom0                   

Hi, > Can you manually do on the xen interfaces what the scripts would? How about > doing it on some other interface configured in a similar way? Toying with the vif-route script, I might have found a workaround for this issue. If I disable the ifconfig and ip route commands from vif-route script, and bring up vif interface by hand later on, everything seems to work. In other works,

Hi, Disregard the message from me last week, I wasn't thinking clearly. Here is my problem, I've got a user, call him USERNAMEX, signing into a samba drive that is a mounted NT drive. I'm mapping all of these users to 1 acct on the samba server (using smbusers). This users sign into a Windows NT Domain, and all of the users (except USERNAMEX) have the domain password as their only

Hi, Using FOP, I've met a situation which makes me ask this simple question : Are both A and B commands bellow equivalent ? A. CLI: originate SIP/9122 application dial Local/9123 at local B. AMI/FOP: 192.168.64.5 -> Action: Originate 192.168.64.5 -> Channel: SIP/9122 192.168.64.5 -> Async: True 192.168.64.5 -> Callerid: 9122 Guest2 <9122> 192.168.64.5 -> Exten: 9123

Hi, I have set up an ubuntu edgy guest domain on a fiesty host domain. The installation was successful but on running xm create -c baseimage, I get the following error message: Error: (22, ''Invalid argument'') The problem seems very similar to the one here: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2007-07/msg00361.html but I''m not able to figure out what the

With GPLPV under 2.6.30, GPLPV gets the following from the ring: ring slot n (first buffer): status (length) = 54 bytes offset = 0 flags = NETRXF_extra_info (possibly csum too but not relevant) ring slot n + 1 (extra info) gso.size (mss) = 1460 Because NETRXF_extra_info is not set, that''s all I get for that packet. In the IP header though, the total length is 1544 (which in itself