similar to: support for hvm

On 06/13/2013 10:11 PM, Michael Giardino wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running libvert on a Debian 7 system. I have upgraded libvert and qemu > from source (v1.06 and 1.5.0 respectively) and the problem persists. The > guest OS is also a Debian 7 system running a non-SMP kernel. The error > message from virt-manager is > > Error starting domain: unsupported configuration:

Hey my R buddies, I installed the "snow" and "rpvm" package on my Lenovo Thinkpad T400 today. The experiment below gave me a surprise. The time consumed by serial processing was several times larger than that taken by parallel processing. I'm very curious how this happened. Thank you very much. > library(snow) > > cc <- makePVMcluster(2) > > temp <-

Hi On a range of Dell servers containing Intel 64bit processors, 'virsh capabilities' reports the cpu differently on Debian Wheezy-amd64 and Wheezy-i386. The results given by the Wheezy-i386 version seem very wrong (since n270 is an Atom processor). Apart from architecture, the package versions of libvirt-bin are identical: 1.2.1-1~bpo70+1. /usr/share/libvirt/cpu_map.xml files are

Hi Martin Thanks for your response. Here's the output of that grep: # grep ^flags /proc/cpuinfo | sort -u flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf eagerfpu pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor

Hi, today I tried to configure a guest using Virt-Manager and used the "copy host cpu configuration" option which resultet in a "Sandy Bridge" model. What I noticed is that for example the "aes" extension is not available in the guest even though it is available on the host cpu. This is what the host cpu looks like: model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v3 @

On 03/03/2014 10:44, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:30:11AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: >> Hi Martin >> >> Thanks for your response. Here's the output of that grep: >> >> # grep ^flags /proc/cpuinfo | sort -u >> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca >> cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx

> Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > >> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: >> >> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel >> >> shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about >> >> Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake >> >> has the current EL6

On 03/03/2014 10:55, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:47:03AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: >> On 03/03/2014 10:44, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:30:11AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: >>>> Hi Martin >>>> >>>> Thanks for your response. Here's the output of that grep: >>>>

On 03/03/2014 13:42, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 11:15:51AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: >> On 03/03/2014 10:55, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:47:03AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: >>>> On 03/03/2014 10:44, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:30:11AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote:

Hi, According to virsh capabilities I only have the following cpu features: <cpu> <arch>x86_64</arch> <model>IvyBridge-IBRS</model> <vendor>Intel</vendor> <microcode version='32'/> <topology sockets='1' cores='4' threads='1'/> <feature name='ds'/>

Hi All, I have recently installed CentOS 6.3 with QEMU+KVM for Virtualization. I have successfully created a Windows 2003 VM with 4GB of RAM. The host server is an HP ML350 G8 with 24GB RAM and 24 cores. Details of one of the cores is shown below: processor : 23 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 45 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @

Hi , Created new thread . Environment: Bare Metal server + CentOs with qemu/KVM +libvirt for virtualization Guest Instantiated with virt-install with forced CPU model like below virt-install --virt-type kvm --name compute-0 --cpu Haswell,+fma,+movbe,+fsgsbase,+bmi1,+hle,+avx2,+smep,+bmi2,+erms,+invpcid,+rtm --ram=61440 --vcpus=20 --os-type=linux --os-variant=generic After guest installation

Hi, I'm running libvert on a Debian 7 system. I have upgraded libvert and qemu from source (v1.06 and 1.5.0 respectively) and the problem persists. The guest OS is also a Debian 7 system running a non-SMP kernel. The error message from virt-manager is Error starting domain: unsupported configuration: guest and host CPU are not compatible: Host CPU does not provide required features: rtm,

> -------- Original message -------- > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] Can I configure cores instead of CPU's > From: Todd And Margo Chester <toddandmargo at gmail.com> > To: "libvirt-users at redhat.com" <libvirt-users at redhat.com> > CC: > > > Hi All, > > Scientific Linux 6.1 x64 > qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.160.el6_1.2.x86_64 > > My XP-Pro

Hi, recently I came across a deal on a bunch of Dell PowerEdge 2850 servers and I was hoping to use them to run Debian with Xen to provided virtualization support for Windows 2003 and other Debian installations. I was hoping to install 2 copies of Windows 2003 as well as 2 copies of Debian all on top of the DOM0 Debian installation. The servers have dual 3.2ghz CPU''s and include 16GB

Hi all, On dual core processor machine, I installed ubuntu-8.04 in which I installed xen-3.2. In ubuntu: # cat /proc/cpuinfo --> Shows two processors information. But in Xen on the same machine: # cat /proc/cpuinfo --> Shows only one processor information. Can anyone please explain what could be the reason behind this? Thanks Saravana

I did a yum update on my management server and now the ovirt gui is no longer accessable. Is it supposed to just work or do I need to do something after the yum update? Justin.

Hi Frank, What does --debug-only=vectorize says? You may try to get the datalayout and the triple on the IR header, just to make sure you got everything right. LLVM will honour those, and front-ends should create them correctly. --renato On 1 July 2015 at 19:06, Frank Winter <fwinter at jlab.org> wrote: > I realized that the function parameters had no alignment attributes on them.

Hi everyone, After much waiting, Opus 1.1.1 is finally here. The main changes are: - x86 SSE, SSE2 and SSE4.1 optimizations contributed by Cisco, - MIPS optimizations contributed by Imagination Technologies, - ARM Neon optimizations contributed by Linaro and ARM, - many architecture-independent optimizations, - memory footprint reductions, and - several minor bug fixes. The quality of the

Frank, It sounds like the SLP vectorizer thinks that it is more profitable to use 128bit wide operations (because 256bit operations are double pumped on Sandybridge). Did you see a different result on Haswell? Thanks, Nadav > On Jul 1, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Frank Winter <fwinter at jlab.org> wrote: > > I realized that the function parameters had no alignment attributes on them.