similar to: ip conntrack table full

Hello I''ve setuped a bridge with l7-filter and ipp2p. We have every day + or - between 10Mbits and 30 Mbits P2P traffic from + or - 450 customers. When traffic increase. I''ve got this kind of error message : Feb 23 14:26:19 gestor1 kernel: printk: 38 messages suppressed. Feb 23 14:26:19 gestor1 kernel: ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. The server is celeron

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91 mschwendt@users.sf.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Additional Comments From mschwendt@users.sf.net

I have just completed the installation of a new firewall running Shorewall 1.4 on Mandrake 9.2 for our campus network. It appears to be running fairly well so far, but is generating significantly more log entries than our previous linux 2.0.x firewall... Our previous firewall enjoyed more than 6 years of 24/7 operation with no downtime before we finally decided it needed more horsepower, and

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=517 ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-09-26 03:44 MET ------- *** Bug 519 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=830 Summary: ??iptables????????? Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org ReportedBy: higkoohk

Hi all, I''m searching for a tutorial how to setup multiple network cards with xen network bridge setup in debian lenny. My problem is, bridges seams only to work if i put an ip adress in dom0 to them. Thanks, Alex _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hey guys, I have several Linux routers in place at high-usage locations (student apartment complexes). I''m having trouble with some of the routers which use 6Mbit DSL lines as their Internet feed. The routers use PPPoE and perform NAT. During peak usage periods, the routers are dropping alot of packets. I''m lead to believe this is because there are too many active

Hello: I have a machine running CentOS 5 x86_64. It is running apache httpd and tomcat. For some reason, after running for a few days, web requests stop responding. It happened again this morning. I check the syslog and see a HUGE number of logs like this: OUTPUT IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=[MyIP] DST=[OutsideIP] LEN=532 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=52669 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=80 DPT=54697 WINDOW=61

Hi, my ip_conntrack table is filling up and now my server is dropping packets. I'm running CentOS release 4.4 (Final) on a fairly busy webserver. The table is full of various connections, including a lot of "ESTABLISHED" tcp connections from my webserver (the src is my webserver ip), and some other random connections to my webserver, and many "ASSURED" connections. So why

I was trying to do what the article at http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.performance.html#conntrack_filling_tables <http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.performance.html#conntrack_filling_tables%3C/blockquote%3E%3C/div%3E> suggested My iptables rules are ------------------------------------------------------------------------ #that's what the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |LATER ------- Additional Comments From

I *think* we are finally making some progress in tracking our elusive performance problems. After employing a second 10Mb link from our ISP, along with another firewall box and proxy, we were able to determine the problem *is* our firewall. We don''t know exactly why yet, but our sporadic slow web access seems to have gone away since swapping a new firewall in this morning. The

I''ve been having all sorts of problems the last few days with my connection slowing down and then stopping working. Rebooting the router box always fixes it for a while. When I couldn''t hit any pages this morning, and couldn''t even ssh into the router, I dug around a little. When I did a dmesg on the router, there were a bunch of errors saying: ip_conntrack: table full,

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-16 09:36 ------- you seem to be running a

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=792 Summary: ip_conntrack keep updating incorrect entry in conntrack table after default routing changed Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-06-24 20:00 ------- Did you try to enlarge your connection tracking table? (Pleae read the FAQ) Do the /proc/net/ip_conntrack entries look plausible, or are there lots of entries with unreasonably high timeout? ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Hi all. i'm trying to modify some parameters but when system reboots it doesn't load. For the sysctl if I run sysctl -p then it changes /etc/sysctl.conf net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max = 1048576 /etc/modprobe.conf options ip_conntrack hashsize=131072 after reboot results cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_max 65536 cat

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-14 09:14 ------- did you load iptable_nat at the time the problem with wrong-destip does happen? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-03 16:49 ------- We haven't seen this

Ok here are all the information the website said I should include first: [root@residents root]# shorewall version 1.4.8 [root@residents root]# ip addr show 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100