similar to: Timer and dynamic tick

Hi there, I am getting very low throughput (around 0.29Mbps) while running netperf benchmark for guest to guest communication on a single physical host. To analyse where the time is spent in hypervisor I wanna use profiling. Please help me choosing good profiler according to my requirments. Should it be better in my case, Xentrace, gprof, xenoprof  or Oprofile. Is it possible to use some vtune

Hi there, I am getting very low throughput (around 0.29Mbps) while running netperf benchmark for guest to guest communication on a single physical host. To analyse where the time is spent in hypervisor I wanna use profiling. Please help me choosing good profiler according to my requirments. Should it be better in my case, Xentrace, gprof, xenoprof  or Oprofile. Is it possible to use some vtune

> > There are quite a few; primarily we simply cannot make lwIP > (lpxelinux.0) work without it. However, pxelinux.0 should not depend on > this. I'm finding most of the problems on lpxelinux.0 > >Now, tickful timekeeping is wasteful, but this is a bootloader, and >functionality is the main concern. The "tickless" version still >depended on the BIOS

Hi, So far as I can tell, the 'col.ticks' parameter for axis() only uses the first value provided. E.g.: plot(0:1,0:1, col.ticks=c('blue','red','green')) #all ticks are blue Just wondering if there's a different option in the basic plot commands that can handle multiple colors, and also whether ggplot and/or lattice allow for multiple tick colors.

Hi! (a complete newby, but will not give up easily!) I was wondering if there is any way to decouple the axis and tick mark widths? As I understand they are both controlled by the lwd setting, and cannot be controlled independently? For example I might want to create major and minor ticks, which I now know how to do by superimposing two axes with different at settings, but what if I also wanted

Dear all, I'm having problems with the tick of my graph. I'mpcombining lines and barplot. For my I'm using the function axis combined with the function pretty to have more efficient tick, but all my tick (for example, 300 as my max tick and -100 as my min tick) are not printed on my graph. So I would like to have for the left axis the seq from 0 to 100 (with 0 and 100 printed on

Full_Name: Sean Pieper Version: 2.3.1 OS: Windows Submission from: (NULL) (67.188.92.37) Hi, I am trying to create a qualitative figure for which I don't want tick marks or numbers, but having some axes would be nice. If I do: plot.new() axis(2,labels=FALSE,tick=FALSE,lty="solid",lwd=1) I expect this should give me a vertical line on the left edge of the plot, but nothing

Hello, I try to increase the distance between tick labels and ticks in a lattice wireframe plot. Here's a minimal example: ## Minimal example x <- y <- z <- c(1,2,3) df <- data.frame(x, y, z) wireframe(z ~ x*y, df, scales = list(arrows = FALSE, col = "black", font = 1, tck=0.6)) I tried the axis.components option

I am using POSIXct objects to store my date/time information. If I am plotting less that 2 days worth of data, I get the correct tick marks on the x-axis which is showing the 'day HH:MM' and these line up with the data points. If the data spans more than 2 days, the tick marks are now off. In the data below, I am creating some sample data and plotting the points. I am in the Eastern

Hi, all. Layout seems to put tick marks only in the leftmost column (for the y axis) and bottom row (for the x axis). This is easy to see using the following trivial program: function (nr, nc) { layout(matrix(1:(nr * nc), nr, nc)) for (i in 1:(nr * nc)) { plot(rnorm(10), rnorm(10)) } layout(matrix(1, 1, 1)) } I'd like to be able to override this behavior and

Hi All, I have a quick question about using plot.Predict now that the rms package uses lattice. I'd like to add tick marks along the regression line, which is given by data=llist(variablename) in the plot call. The ticks show up fine, but I'd like to alter the color. I know the ticks are produced by scat1d, but after spending a fair bit of time going through documentation, it still

Hi, After c/s 18694 changed vHPET to vpt, for single HVM RHEL 5u1 guest idle case, our box will consume ~0.8W more power than before. The reason is two periodical vpts'' expires are hard to be aligned in the 50us soft timer SLOP. So we are considering a vpt specific enhancement which could try to just align periodical timers within vpt. A generic enhancement is to add a new interface

Dear R people, I wonder how to hide tick lines behind other figures in a plot, e.g. in a boxplot. # Sample code: x<- c(rep(4,50),rep(5,20),rep(6,50),rnorm(20,5,1)) boxplot(x) axis(2,tck=1,col.ticks='grey',lty=5 ) # end of sample code The tick lines is put on top of the box-plot, but I would like to put these lines behind the box and whiskers.. Regards Helmer

On 03/01/16 21:11, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote: > On 03/01/16 07:21, Patrick Masotta via Syslinux wrote: >> >> At the moment I'm seeing timing issues on TFTP transfers (lwIP depends >> on the new interrupt based timer). I have consistently detected >> >> multiple Requests, double ACKs, etc. All these problems seem to be >> >> sourced on the

Hi ! I need a plot for data extending over several orders of magnitude on the y axis. The following command generates a nice looking semi-log plot for my data: plot(x,y,log="y",type="l",lty=3, ylim=c(0.01,2),yaxp=c(0.01,1,1),las=1) I would appreciate having also minor tick marks in-between the 3 major ticks obtained with the above command. The "minor.tick" function

Hello list, Thank you very much for replying to my earlier questions. I have a few new questions about R plots: Example: tempdata: RDate Price 2009-12-09 12:00 100 2009-12-09 15:00 99 2009-12-09 18:00 102 .... 2009-12-10 8:00 120 2009-12-10 10:00 110 2009-12-10 16:00 105 My code: (RDate already in R date-time class) plot (price~RDate, data=tempdata, "l") axis.POSIXct(1,

Dear R People: In case anyone is interested, here are some of the answers I received regarding tick marks: plot(0,0) axis(1, pos=0) axis(2, pos=0) O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3 c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45)

I have a Lattice plot in which I want to adjust the number of tick marks used, and I want to have the drawn grid reflect that change. Here is what I'm doing: bwplot(var1 ~ var2, data=df, scales=list(tick.number=10), panel=function(...) { panel.grid(h=0,v=-1,...); panel.stripplot(col="gray40", pch="|", cex=2, ...); panel.bwplot(...); })

I think allowing the user to change the labels is a good idea, but have some nitpicking about the details. - Could you grab a copy of the current axis.Date source from https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/library/graphics/R/datetime.R and edit that, rather than what you see in R? There are some comments in the source that shouldn't be lost. This will also mean that it's easier to

Hello, I want to reduce the distance between my ticks and their labels. I managed to do it for the x-axis, but the y-axis puzzles me. Here's an example where there is no space between the x-asix ticks and labels. par(las=1) plot(runif(50), type="l",xaxt="n",yaxt="n",ylab="", bty="l") axis(2) axis(1,padj=-1.5) #However, axis(2,padj=-1.5)