similar to: windows 2008 server x86 + 3 gb memory

This is all on SuSE enterprise 10 Our server was moved to a new location last night. After powerup there was no sign of networking so our ISP reconfigured the box. Outbound connectivity had previously been through eth1 but is now through eth0 Since restarting Xen I now have no network connectivity through the hosts. I have tried to provide all the relevant details below. If anyone has a moment

I''ve recently installed Debian Lenny witch Xen (xen-utils, xen.tools and xen-linux-system-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64). I want to virtualize some windows servers, but I''m unable to connect to localhost VNC when I start the vm (xm create) to proceed with windows instalation. The VM config is: import os, re arch = os.uname()[4] if re.search(''64'', arch):

I run windows xp in xen. boot in Acronis boot disk and virtual machine sleeping in moment "Starting Acronis Loader..." config: serial=''pty'' kernel = "/usr/lib/xen-3.2-1/boot/hvmloader" builder = ''hvm'' memory = 128 name = "standart_windows" vcpus=1 pae=0 acpi=1 apic=1 usb=1 vif = [ ''type=ioemu, mac=00:16:3e:00:00:94,

Hello, We are planning to install a Windows 2008 DomU in one of our servers (SUSE 10/SP2, XEN 3.2). Does someone have some experience in installing 2008 ? Are they some know problems (and solutions if possible) to success in thre process. Here is the setup we will use for that DomU : ------------------------------------------------------------------- # SR3 MV9 name="SAP-IDES-ECC"

After upgrading Win7 and W2K8 R2 clients to service pack 1 it is no longer possible to log in to domain(before the upgrade the clients can log in into domain). Clean installation of Win7/W2K8 R2 with integrated sp1 has the same effect. Our domain PDC is running on samba 3.3.7. I'm curious if anyone else has seen this already. Thank you Mikhail Zuskov

X32 support patch for compiler-rt. Applies against current trunk. --- projects/compiler-rt/make/platform/clang_linux.mk~ 2013-08-21 06:27:38.000000000 +0000 +++ projects/compiler-rt/make/platform/clang_linux.mk 2013-08-21 11:16:55.891621025 +0000 @@ -41,7 +41,18 @@ SupportedArches += x86_64 endif else - SupportedArches := x86_64 + # x86-64 arch has two ABIs 64 bit x86-64 and 32 bit

If you are interesting to play around X32, you may refer to http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/x32 to bootstrap a local environment on Linux. Yours - Michael -----Original Message----- From: cfe-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:cfe-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Liao, Michael Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 5:09 PM To: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu; cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu

Clang patch for X32 support. Applies against current trunk. --- ./tools/clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td.orig 2013-05-16 21:51:51.286129820 +0000 +++ ./tools/clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td 2013-05-16 21:53:24.875004239 +0000 @@ -841,6 +841,7 @@ HelpText<"Enable hexagon-qdsp6 backward compatibility">; def m3dnowa : Flag<["-"], "m3dnowa">,

Hi all, We (Intel) would like to revive this thread on X32 ABI support upstreaming. X32 ABI homepage is here: https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/ Currently x32 support is available in kernel/glibc/gcc/binutils and one can install for example Ubuntu 14 with extra x32 lib packages (apt-get install libc6-dev-x32) to evaluate x32-target code generated by GCC (gcc supports x32 on Ubuntu 14 out of

Hi, I'm working on bringing up complete coverage for a Gentoo x32 "desktop" system. I've been cooking up quite a few patches for various packages to push upstream, but right now, the biggest blocker is the lack of support for building with/codegen targeting x32 in llvm/clang. Since the x32 patches were sent last year, I see support code has landed in LLVM, and basic handling of

Hi! I've successfully installed tinc on Solaris 8 x86. Everything seem to work ok except for one thing, I get 5kb/s transfer rates over a 100mbit TP connection. Is this a known problem or have I made some mistakes? My setup is really simple: anna(Win XP - Tinc 1.0.2 using the Win32-TAP driver) <=> LAN <=> sara (Solaris 8 x86 - Tinc 1.0.2 using the TUN/TAP 1.1 driver, OpenSSL

stubdom: add example config file Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@eu.citrix.com> diff -r e69570f85e85 tools/examples/stubdom-ExampleHVMDomain --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/tools/examples/stubdom-ExampleHVMDomain Thu Jul 17 19:31:13 2008 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +# Not to be started directly, +# See xmexample.hvm-stubdom and stubdom/README for more details

On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 11:50 +0400, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Steven Newbury <steve at snewbury.org.uk>wrote: > > > On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 11:27 +0400, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > > > Hi Steven, > > > > > > This looks interesting and raises a number of questions :) > > > > > > 1) Does applying this patch

Hello, Background: We (the Portable Native Client team) would like to continue upstreaming our LLVM modifications which contain support for Software Fault Isolation (SFI) as required for sandboxing programs to run under Native Client. Since the "total patch size" is quite big, we are splitting the effort to manageable chunks that can be committed, tested and reviewed separately as

On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 15:22 +0100, Steven Newbury wrote: > This patch is still not creating elf32_x86_64 objects. No idea > why. :( It does however, fix elf_x86_64 (-m64) code generation on x32 > hosts which is nice. :) I know why. I had assumed Michael Liao (the original patch author) had submitted all the _LLVM_ x32 support as separate patches, and it was just the

Hi, There's several, to my eyes, somewhat related looking bugs: Bug 36743 - Cannot select: X86ISD::CALL ICE with -mx32 -O2 -fno-plt https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36743 Bug 34268 - JITting of x32 code on x64 fails with crash or instruction selection error. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34268 There's unfortunately been no investigation. I'm asking because I hit

Hello! We have a w2k8 R2 64-bit machine in a Samba 3.4.4 controlled domain. When logging in as a domain user there is a ~30 sec delay waiting for the User Profile Service. This has nothing to do with the size of the user profile. Looking at the network traffic I can see 2 gaps, the first about 11 sek and the second about 19 sek with no packets sent except one TCP ACK (from the client) in each

On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 12:29 +0400, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Steven Newbury <steve at snewbury.org.uk>wrote: > > > On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 11:50 +0400, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Steven Newbury <steve at snewbury.org.uk > > >wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 2013-08-22 at

On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 11:27 +0400, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > Hi Steven, > > This looks interesting and raises a number of questions :) > > 1) Does applying this patch actually bring working sanitizers to x32 > platform? > That is, after you build the clang, does "clang -fsanitize=whatever foo.c" > compile/link/run with expected results? > I doubt that, as

Rafa?l Carr? wrote: > That would need a special case for Linux x32 which is x86_64 with 32 > bits pointers It won't be wrong for x32, just sub-optimal. Please feel free to suggest a way to detect x32. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/