similar to: HVM on Dell Optiplex 755

Dear Users, in my case, i want to passthrough a pci-e graphiccard to a hvm guest. In the bios i have to select whether the onboard graphic is used as primary vga output or the pci-e one. If i define the onboard one then the pci-e card gets unavailable in xen, furthermore lspci did not show it anymore. if i set the pci-e card as primary, it comes up fine in xen, but if i hide that card which is

Xen 3.4 xen-unstable.hg from yesterday with debian etch on 64bit arch Intel/Lenovo Q35 Mainboard with VT-d enabled Bootoptions iommu=1 vtd=1 pci.backhide for a PCI-E nvidia graphiccard xm dmesg Error messages includes: [VT-D] iommu.c: 1694:d32767 iommu: mapping reserved region failed [VT-D] iommu.c: 1542:d0 intel_iommu_add_device: context mapping failed If i try to start my HVM by xm create

Hi, I want to know how everything communicates with XenStore. Do domUs use the front-end/back-end driver to dom0 and then the back-end driver contacts xenstored? In particular, how do the xenstore-* commands work on a dom0 and domU? And when should unix-domain sockets be used to communicate with xenstored? Thanks, Hayawardh _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing

Hi, I have compiled xen-unstable (using hg clone http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg). I have successfully booted into the dom0 kernel. output of xm list: Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 932 1 r----- 591.2 But whenever I xm create, I get: # xm create /etc/xen/domu1 Using config file

I have a question about the performance of the implementation of the stack protector in LLVM. Consider the following C program: ===== void canary() { char buf[20]; buf[0]++; } int main() { int i; for (i = 0; i < 1000000000; ++i) canary(); return 0; } ===== This should definately run slower when stack protection is enabled, right? I have measured the runtime of

Hi all, xend communicates with xenstored using unix domain sockets right? So, would it be possible to convert the unix domain sockets to tcp/ip sockets and let xenstored run on a different machine? Regards, Hayawardh _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi, I compiled the xen-3.2 unstableand have booted successfully into dom0. When I try to start a domU, it gives me an error: [root@xx xx]# xm create -c /etc/xen/fedora.fc6.cse Using config file "/etc/xen/fedora.fc6.cse" Error: Not enough memory is available, and dom0 cannot be shrunk any further xm list gives: Name ID Mem VCPUs State

From: Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at suespammers.org> > Btw, don't quote me on this one :) > I'm only 90% sure of the hotswapping capabilities, and less than 50% > sure about the price :) There _are_ systems with hot-swap CPUs, memory and/or, PCI[-X] slots. They are _not_ commodity and pricey, and require OS-level support. In fact, I believe Linux 2.6 has some support for

If you compile this with optimizations, then the 'canary()' function should be totally inlined into the 'main()' function. In that case, the cost of the stack protectors will be very small compared to the loop. -bw On Mar 9, 2012, at 2:52 AM, Job Noorman <jobnoorman at gmail.com> wrote: > I have a question about the performance of the implementation of the stack >

-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> > 1) What version of Syslinux? I just checked the configuration again and we're not using syslinux. It's pxelinux.0 and is served via: filename "pxelinux.0"; next-server 172.16.0.2; # strings pxelinux.0 | grep PXELINUX PXELINUX 3.82 3.82 But thats the same version. Any ideas? It's part of

Package: xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64 Version: 3.2.1-2 Severity: normal After giving xen a shoot with the fresh lenny packages, an annoying bug comes up right after trying to boot into the new system. I'll provide further informations if needed. Please see serial debug output below and here http://plzk.de/xen-lenny (maxlines got extended for comfortable reading) XEN) Xen version 3.2-1

Hi, I need your help. Now I installed the SAMBA (2.0.7) in my Sun E4500 server ( solaris 2.7). I can not connect from my NT workstation. When I try to connect from NT to unix(Solaris 2.7) c:\ net use g: \\gemw-q01\test /user:user1 I get the following messages: The password is invalid for \\gemw-q01\test Type

Hi - I'm trying to get wireless running on CentOS 4.7 on a dual core laptop (latitude-e4500) for an employee. I'm having trouble with building dkms-ndiswraper-1.54-1.el4.rf - enclosed are the errors messages. The kernel was rebuilt to disable CONFIG_4KSTACKS. The errors prior to rebuilding the kernel are identical to the errors after rebuilding the kernel and rebooting - minus the error

Dear Developers & Users, I'm using pxe booting on SLES11 sp3. My clients are all Lenovo/IBM E73 Workstations with latest bios. My config is: LABEL disk LOCALBOOT 0 unfortunately this is not working. I tried all 5 options to localboot 1,2,3... as well as chainloading with chain.c32 like described in the wiki: http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Hardware_Compatibility#LOCALBOOT

Good evening dear users and developers, I'm using samba 3.5.6 on Debian Squeeze as Domain-Controller for several Windows XP clients. Config below. One user installed a software with settings in C:\documents and settings\martin\.vkbstandalone/.metadata/.plugins/de.vkb.standalone.tomcat/work/catalina/localhost/eba_standalone_web/org/apache/jsp/jsp/composite/angebot/angebot zum

Hi all, (My first time in seeking assistance via the CentOS mailing list ... Not sure if I should be submitting this as a possible kernel bug). I've successfully installed Cent OS 5.1 (kernel: 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5) on an Optiplex 755 (EM64T). However I'm not able to get a NVIDIA Gigabyte 8600GT (PCI-e) card to work with the system despite successfully installing the latest NVIDIA drivers

From: Peter Arremann <loony at loonybin.org> > Compiles aren't a great benchmark for a box since its 100% cpu and > neglects memory or disk performance but I had the numbers handy > for that :-) BTW, it is 100% ALU and a major strain on the ALU LOAD. In other words, it's not a good benchmark for even CPU. That's why the 3-issue ALU in the Nx586 on-ward blows the

Hello listmates, We are working on setting up two private networks linked by a public network which is fast (1 Gbit/s) but potentially insecure. Since the hosts on our two networks need to talk to each other, and do so securely, we have decided to use OpenVPN to connect them, making one gateway a server and the other a client. The connectivity part was easy to establish and worked like a charm.

Hello list. I'm new here, and I'm joining because I'm having a problem wich I can't figure out the solution myself. Here's what's happening: A Samba 3.0.24 is serving files to seven Windows XP clients. Three of those clients run an application with a BDE database. The problem is that when running this application on Samba, it gets very, VERY slow, causing it to hang. I

Hello, I don't know how off the wall this question will be, but first let me say that I've found your buildpkg.sh script very useful in creating an OpenSSH package for use on my Solaris systems. Currently I'm trying to set up a fully automated JumpStart system at my workplace, and I'm realizing that the 'postinstall' script (and possibly some of the other install scripts)