similar to: Vista Ultimate 32-bit install - VNC woes

From: Jyri Sarha <jsarha at ti.com> Semantics of inner_product_single have also been changed to contain the final right shift and saturation so it can also be implemented in the optimal way for the used platform. This change affects fixed point calculations only. I also added a new fixed point macro SATURATE32PSHR(x, shift, a). It does pretty much the same thing as SATURATE32(PSHR32(x,

Dear developers! I''ve found that recent xen releases cannot be simly run on openSUSE! The script /etc/xen/scripts/xen-network-common.sh makes some incorrect assumptions on the SuSE ifup script. Bridged xen networking only works if the script executes this branch: preiftransfer() { true } ifup() { false } ifdown() { false } Otherwise the xen networking scripts fail to put the

Dear Admin, I will appreciate if you advise me an effective way to write the following R code including nested for loops. I cannot do it by using expand.grid function because it results with memory allocation problems. Thanks for your time and consideration. for(d1 in 0:n){ for(d2 in 0:n){ for(d3 in 0:n){ for(d4 in 0:n){ for(d5 in 0:n){ for(d6 in 0:n){ for(d7 in 0:n){ for(d8 in 0:n){ for(d9 in

Hi, I just got two new UPS's - GE EP6000R. These have both RS232 and USB connection. As far as I could detect these are not supported by NUT. However, they provide some Linux software and as long as these UPS's are not in production (another week or so) I could 'play' with them to try to get some protocol information. Though I would need some pointers on how to do it... Mind you

Hi, I have a Xen server running OpenSuSE 10.2, with Xen version 3.0.3_11774. It''s happily hosting two DomU''s running the same OS / kernel. Now I tried to create a new DomU running a newer OS - OpenSuSE 11.1. It comes with Xen version 3.3.1_18494_03. Unfortunately for me, it doesn''t work - this is what I get: > xen1:/etc/xen/vm # xm create NEW > Using config file

Hi, recently I got a GE EP6000R UPS. At first I feared it's not supported at all, but after digging in I found out that it's supported by the 'blazer' driver. The UPS has both RS232 and USB connection. To use the RS232 connection, I had to use the 'cablepower = none' as the UPS is using only RX, TX and GND pins. So my 'usp.conf' was a bit like that: > [myups]

Hi, Creating a new domain is a lot easier in opensuse 11. I follow the instruction on the website and build a virtual machine which uses opensuse 11 as well (I installed it from iso image). Everything works fine except the network. I cannot access the Internet from DomU. Here is some information. P.S. the DomU id is 1. "brctl show" in Dom 0: bridge name bridge id STP

Hi all, I’m not sure if this is the right list, so apologies if not. Doing some profiling I noticed some of my hand-tuned matrix multiply code with NEON intrinsics was much slower through a C++ template wrapper vs calling the intrinsics function directly. It turned out clang/LLVM was unable to eliminate a temporary even though the case seemed quite straightforward. Unfortunately any loads

Hi, I have three Xen hosts running Xen 4.0.2 (OpenSuSE 11.4 based). I also have one ''NFS'' server with an NFS export holding VM images and configuration files. Each host has a dedicated LAN link directly to the NFS server. I have another separated NFS export for VM locking (but I had the same issues before). When I attempt to live migrate a VM, it *looks''*like

Got a problem after upgrading Samba from 3.0 to 3.5 - have a bunch of users and groups in LDAP and things work for the most part. However, when people try to change permissions from within Windows, some usernames or groupnames are shown properly, but other are not - they see the SID. Following up I noticed, that I can get a list of all users with 'wbinfo -u' and that I can get a SID for

Hello Renato, You're pointing me at ARM intrinsics related to loads, problem that I've reported in original e-mail, is not support for vector loads, but support for 'vmaxs'. For instance, there is no vector loads of 16 floats in ARM ISA but it is legal to write in LLVM: ; ModuleID = 'vadd.ll' target datalayout =

I'm writing a function and keep getting the following error message. myfunc <- function(lst) { lst <- list(roots = c("car insurance", "auto insurance"), roots2 = c("insurance"), prefix = c("cheap", "budget"), prefix2 = c("low cost"), suffix = c("quote", "quotes"), suffix2 = c("rate",

Hi Andy, thanks for your help!! The scheduled code by method A is same as B when using the new machine model. it's make sense, but there is the another problem, the scheduled code is badly. load/store instruction always reuse the same register Source: #define N 2000000 static double b[N], c[N]; void Scale () { double scalar = 3.0; for (int j=0;j<N;j++) b[j] =

On 14 October 2013 19:31, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com>wrote: > Renato, can you post the c code for the function and the assembly that gcc > produces? > Attached. Your initial example could be well handled by vectorization of strided > loops (and the mentioning of VLD3(.8?)/VST3(.8?) lead me to assume that > this is what happened). But the LLVM-IR you

Hi, does anyone know the above mentioned UPS and whether it's supported by NUT? It has an RS-232 interface, the manual talks about a 'Java Universal Management Platform' (JUMP) software (which I can't find). Thanks, Danilo -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: danilo_godec.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 315 bytes Desc: not available

Hi, I have two identical UPS's on USB bus. The original machine I was going to use for UPS monitoring only had had USB bus, so these two UPS's were seen like that: Bus 001 Device 009: ID 14f0:00c9 Bus 001 Device 007: ID 14f0:00c9 There was no description on the right side either. If I used the 'verbose' flag, both UPS's had the exact same output... I since replaced the

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Sebastien DELDON-GNB <sebastien.deldon at st.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to know if LLVM Neon intrinsics are designed to support only 'Legal' types for NEON units. > Using llc -march=arm -mcpu=cortex-a9 vmax4.ll -o vmax4.s on following ll code: > > > ; ModuleID = 'vmax.ll' > target datalayout =

Hi all, I would like to know if LLVM Neon intrinsics are designed to support only 'Legal' types for NEON units. Using llc -march=arm -mcpu=cortex-a9 vmax4.ll -o vmax4.s on following ll code: ; ModuleID = 'vmax.ll' target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-n32" target triple =

On Sep 21, 2012, at 2:58 AM, Sebastien DELDON-GNB <sebastien.deldon at st.com> wrote: > Hi Eli, > > Thanks for the answer, it clarifies the situation for me. Do you know if there is Pass in LLVM that could be adapted to 'legalize' intrinsics calls ? > Or shall I define my own intrinsics for non supported types ? You should never generate these sorts of intrinsics with

Hi Eli, Thanks for the answer, it clarifies the situation for me. Do you know if there is Pass in LLVM that could be adapted to 'legalize' intrinsics calls ? Or shall I define my own intrinsics for non supported types ? Best Regards Seb ________________________________________ De : Eli Friedman [eli.friedman at gmail.com] Date d'envoi : vendredi 21 septembre 2012 11:54 À : Sebastien