similar to: console output

Hi All, I''m currently installing RHEL 5.1 with Xen and I want to manage the server using a management console that is equivalent with VMware Console or Web based management. Is there any tools that is available today? Any advice? Setup Details: * no X server * xen kernel * rhel 5.1 * hp blade server cheers, janskey _______________________________________________

Hi All, I''m currently installing RHEL 5.1 with Xen and I want to manage the server using a management console that is equivalent with VMware Console or Web based management. Is there any tools that is available today? Any advice? Setup Details: * no X server * xen kernel * rhel 5.1 * hp blade server cheers, janskey _______________________________________________

I have a number of CentOS6 machines, and on one of them, the daily prelink cron job aborts. Any ideas what to look for? /etc/cron.daily/prelink: /etc/cron.daily/prelink: line 47: 9381 Aborted (core dumped) /usr/sbin/prelink -av $PRELINK_OPTS >> /var/log/prelink/prelink.log 2>&1 I'm unfamiliar with prelink, so I'm not sure what to look for in the logs.

Can anybody explain to me what's going on here? This is a CentOS 4 i386 system. [root at edison ~]# rm -f /etc/prelink.cache [root at edison ~]# /etc/cron.daily/prelink [root at edison ~]# rpm -qf /usr/bin/sqlite3 sqlite-3.3.6-2 [root at edison ~]# rpm --verify sqlite prelink: /usr/bin/sqlite3: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?.....

On Wed, August 30, 2017 10:43 am, Tony Schreiner wrote: > This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line > > HASH_CMD=sha1sum > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > >> Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting warnings from >> rkhunterWarning: Checking for prerequisites [ Warning

Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting warnings from rkhunterWarning: Checking for prerequisites [ Warning ] All file hash checks will be skipped because: This system uses prelinking, but the hash function command does not look like SHA1 or MD5. Now, googling, I find people saying to rm /etc/prelink.cache, then run rkhunter --propupd. Works. And then,

in my prior message, that should be in rkhunter.conf On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Tony Schreiner <anthony.schreiner at bc.edu> wrote: > This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line > > HASH_CMD=sha1sum > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > >> Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting

So, what does this do? # cat /etc/prelink.conf.d/skype.conf -b /usr/bin/skype -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax:

I have a large installer program (~400MB) that fails to run under wine (20050310). It gives me the following: err:virtual:map_image Image was mapped at 0x60640000: standard load address for a Win32 program (0x00400000) not available err:virtual:map_image Do you have exec-shield or prelink active? wine: could not load L"C:\\WebPACK_71_fcfull_i.exe" as Win32 binary The thing is that I

The above discussion of prelink gave me pause for thought... I have a "suite" of programs that I install in their own directory, along with their datafiles, under /opt. Would it be a good idea to add that directory to /etc/prelink.conf? What could go wrong? -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com

Hi People, I have just started building my own RPMS on both Fedora and CentOS and generally things have gone well. Currently I am trying to create RPMS for some commercial software that we have purchased. Step 1 was install the software using its JAVA Based installer ensuring that all files were installed into a particular directory in /usr/local. Step 2 was create a tar file of the

Hi all! Trying to get magic workstation (www.magicworkstation.com) to run correctly. My distro (BT4R1) comes with an older version of wine, so I uninstalled it then installed Wine Stable 1.2. Compiled it manually, got it everything it needed save one thing from the ./configure and it seemed to install fine, but it did not fix my problem. There are still some game breaking graphical isssues with

What are the pros and cons of disabling prelinking in CentOS 4? From what I understand, prelinking is ment to be performance improvement (faster loading time for binaries). I can see some potential benefit on workstations where many different processes are started frequently. But how big is that benefit in real life? Would I slow down things noticably if there is no prelinking? Is

Good day, i've got a problem with antivir, probably someone knows: error (211): program file of AntiVir has been modified". I wonder if prelink is affecting it?

In short, the reason considering (and still only considering) turning it off is to make tripwire usable again (security vs. performance, I guess). Is it possible to completely turn it off system-wide? Any additional steps needed on the existing system (that already have half of the binaries prelinked)? What order of performance degradation to expect? If it is minor, nobody is going to cry

I am running a Xen installation on a Centos-4.4 based test box, my desktop unit, and I am having intermittent problems installing certain pieces of software. Some time back I posted to this list regarding my inability to install Adobe Acrobat on this unit and was advised to essentially repackage the software and try again. This is beyond my present means of knowledge or time to acquire same and

On 08/28/2013 02:37 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > 1. I'm concerned about the deployment problem. I realize that being in > the compiler means you can transform the program in more exciting > ways, but it gives you a much worse deployment story than something > which modifies the program on disk like "prelink". Yes, definitely. Deployment is an issue which users will need

On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 11:03 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Wed, August 30, 2017 10:43 am, Tony Schreiner wrote: > > This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line > > > > HASH_CMD=sha1sum > > > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > > > > > Can't remember if I posted this before...

Dear Friends, I am using CENTOS 4.3 - kernel 2.6.9-42.0.2.EL with rkhunter version 1.2.8, but the rkhunter program show me problem on file /bin/kill. I compare files /bin/kill with other CENTOS 4 and it has same size. ====================== SHOE LOG =========================== Rootkit Hunter 1.2.8 is running Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:56:44 -0200 Determining OS... Ready Checking binaries *

I think it would be interesting to have a compiler option to add the bit code to the .s or .o file in some kind of a non linkable section. This would give you the option at link time of doing lto without having to change make files, etc. The driver would need to have some kind of prelink step to extract the bitcode in the case of lto. Just a thought...