similar to: virtual machine lvm issues during install

I am mirroring two drives during install, what's the best practice here for the swap partition? Maybe two separate lv's from independent vg's *not* mirrored for swap and the let the OS manage it? Boot and the / vg will be mirrored. Thanks! jlc

I am searching the net for instructions on how to do this in CentOS 5.1 but am not 100% sure I am finding a reliable doc. I am doing this remotely and don't have much room for error:) Can anyone point me along here? Thanks! jlc

Are there any ways to improve/manage the speed of pvmove? Man doesn't show any documented switches for priority scheduling. Iostat shows the system way underutilized even though the lv whose pe's are being migrated is continuously being written (slowly) to. Thanks! jlc

How does one do this? Also, is it possible an rpm installed by rpm and not yum does not indicate what it provides to yum when yum queries needed dependencies for another package? Thanks! jlc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080330/18ba2e89/attachment-0001.html>

I''m trying to do what I think would be relatively simple but can''t seem to make it work. Essentially I want to create several domU''s running CentOS each with it''s own LVM partition for increased performance over image files. Initially I did a test with image files and everything went fine, I booted the supplied initrd and vmlinuz images installed CentOS from

I have never been able to get tap:aio devices running. When I try it in a Linux PV domain, it says: XENBUS: Waiting for devices to initialise: 295s... And they don''t work in my GPLPV drivers, which is the problem I am trying to solve, but I''d like to see them work under Linux first. Is there anything extra I need to do? I have loaded the xenblktap module (forgot to do this

How do I check if the proper sata drivers are being loaded? If they are not what can I do other then rebuilding the kernel? Thank you in advance, Randy _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:29:53PM +0200, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > * xend is now disabled by default. You can enable it by running > > chkconfig. xend has been removed from the tree entirely in Xen 4.5, > > so this should (hopefully) serve as a "wake-up-call" for people to > > begin the transition over to xend. > > > > * A lot have

So how does one accomplish this if say the snap is now deemed the copy of interest? I am hoping dd is not the only answer:) Thanks! jlc

i try to change one of my images from lvm to file with dd if=/dev/vps/centos of=/root/mj.img the fiel whas created byt will not ok i bigin boot but failed i remember the system can''t find the lvm groups i not remember anymore _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Before, in my "Hard Problem" email I was trying to communicate a design issue were trying to solve with Xen. This is what we need to do: 1) Deploy 24 Windows XP VMs in parallel. 2) Boot them from a shared Windows XP C: drive. 3) Since this is a read-only shared image we obviously can''t have multiple VM''s writing to it. 4) All writes to the boot image for logging,

Before, in my "Hard Problem" email I was trying to communicate a design issue were trying to solve with Xen. This is what we need to do: 1) Deploy 24 Windows XP VMs in parallel. 2) Boot them from a shared Windows XP C: drive. 3) Since this is a read-only shared image we obviously can''t have multiple VM''s writing to it. 4) All writes to the boot image for logging,

Is there any benchmark or does anyone have tried which one is fastest? Regards, -- Thiago Vinhas de Moraes ________________________________________________________ SimpleWeb Tecnologia Inovativa Soluções em cloud computing e gerenciamento de TI Av. das Américas, 500 - Bloco 23 / Sala 215 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ Tel/Fax: 0800-8880-WEB / (21) 3002-0377 Celular: .(21)

What is the name of this tool that appears when you reboot from install and allows you to setup your selinux, iptables and auth configuration? Thanks! jlc

So, if I read this right, Samba4 should be able to participate as a domain controller, if I specify the option --with-ads, right? I'm using the following options: --with-winbind --with-swat --with-ads --with-ldap --with-acl-support --with-dnsupdate --with-aio-support --prefix=/opt/samba-4.0.0 --sysconfdir=/etc/samba-4.0.0 --localstatedir=/var/samba-4.0.0 The configure script pukes at the

I realize this might be one of those religious topics, but is there any good rule of thumb as to how to setup storage for a Xen domU? Without really knowing any better, I''m basically going to make a disk image of the OS and the create a ''data'' partition on my raid 5 volume for each virtual machine. This is for use at home, so in reality it probably doesn''t

Hi. I want use xen with dynamic slices. For example, I have 20 domU based on FreeBSD, xen hypervisor 3.3.1, Debian Lenny dom0 system. All domUs have 80Gb LVM partitions, but realy they use 20 of this 80Gb and I want to create more domU''s. How can I do it? I know that some virtualisation have possibility to do dynamic slices(4 example Virtul box) -- Best Regards, alex.faq8@gmail.com

Hi, Ive just tried Xen 4.0 on Gentoo with 2.6.32 (also tried 2.6.31) forward ported dom0 kernel, Xen itself seems to boot up successfully and everything else on the system is working normally, but when I try to start a domain xm create appears to hang and eventually I get a hotplug scripts error: Error: Device 2049 (vbd) could not be connected. /etc/xen/scripts/block failed; error detected.

Hi, Ive just tried Xen 4.0 on Gentoo with 2.6.32 (also tried 2.6.31) forward ported dom0 kernel, Xen itself seems to boot up successfully and everything else on the system is working normally, but when I try to start a domain xm create appears to hang and eventually I get a hotplug scripts error: Error: Device 2049 (vbd) could not be connected. /etc/xen/scripts/block failed; error detected.

Now I''m sure that the following configuration can destroy a PostgreSQL 8.3.5 database: * Linux host (dom0) with XEN, XFS filesystem with "nobarrier", RAID controller with battery backed cache. * XEN vm (domU) with XFS filesystem with "nobarrier" with postgresql * my daughter with 3.5 years switching off the power supply of the server, just behind the UPS Seems XEN