similar to: Have 2 DomU share a same Logical Volume

Hi, I have already set up a VM that can access the network using the NAT mode. The problem I have is that I''d like to create another VM that also has access to the network. The problem I get is that when a VM is started, the other one will refuse to start. Actually it starts, but when I want to "xm console" into it I get the following error message: "xenconsole: Could not

Hi list, I am running a virtualized server. Dom0 uses Xen 3.2.1 with Debian Etch and a custom kernel 2.6.21 created by my webhosting company. I install my domU using debootstrap for a Debian Etch with 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 kernel. Everything works well except the fact that once the VM is started I cannot "xm console" into it. It only works while it is booting and while it is shutting

Am 24.05.2015 um 16:11 schrieb Johnny Hughes: > On 05/24/2015 07:48 AM, Tim Semeijn wrote: >> Weird, as all CentOS machines under my control are suddenly giving the >> baseurl of Base repo not found error since this morning. Could be that >> mirrorlist is leading but all other options I found online to debug >> the error message seem to indicate that (un)commenting

Here is a programming question. The code I am using is quite slow and I was wondering if there is a way to get rid of the for loop. I am dealing with "interaction" in 2x2 table, and am using Edwards's G_I (Likelihood, p. 194). I label the cells in the table as follows stim response "y" "n" total -------------------------------- y hit miss nsignal

So I got very mixed results. With the CallGraphSCCPass, both `addRequired<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>` and `addRequired<MemoryDependenceAnalysis>` fail at runtime. The LLVM core has just two CallGraphSCCPasses and neither uses neither analyses, so it's hard to find a valid example. I transformed the pass into a ModulePass, using scc_iterator as shown in CGPassManager to process

The title says it all. verifyFunction checks it (Verifier.cpp, line 728). Why can't BasicBlocks that serve as a function's entry point also have predecessors? What keeps a function from looping back to its beginning? Félix -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Thanks John. Does this solve the problem of analysis availability though? If I still have to run the function analyses manually, I might as well keep rolling with the CallGraphSCCPass. (I probably should have mentioned that this is what I’m using right now.) Félix > Le 2015-05-19 à 10:12:32, John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com> a écrit : > > On 5/18/15 10:45 PM, Félix Cloutier

Hello guys, I'd like to use Clang to parse snippets of (and emit bytecode for) C++ code that come from larger files that don't contain only C++, but looking at the clang interpreter example, either I didn't get it, or it looks like the driver expects only files, and not strings or char buffers. Is there a simple way to achieve this? Do I have to split my input into small files and

Hi there, (sorry for my bad english speaking) I was broadcasting my Iphones audio feed to the Icecast server : http://104.236.126.104:8000/ or http://104.236.126.104/ (port 8000) But now it seams like that server is dead... An other developper set it up for me, so I don't know if we just need to re-activate it by paying or else... It was working in December 2017. I use the application

Hey guys, I'd need to debug just-in-time compiled code under Mac OS. As predicted, GDB doesn't cope really well with it. The LLVM manual seems to say it's possible to patch GDB under Linux, but there seems to be no option for Mac OS. What can I do? I'd prefer a solution that integrates with Xcode, but I'll manage if it doesn't and I have to run the debugger externally.

Hello Félix- Consider the following snippet of IR: define i32 @foo(i32 %n) nounwind { entry: br label %loop loop: %loop.n = phi i32 [0, %entry], [%tmp, %loop] call void @bar() nounwind %tmp = sub nsw i32 %loop.n, 1 %cmp = icmp eq i32 %tmp, 0 br i1 %cmp, label %exit, label %loop exit: ret i32 0 } declare void @bar() nounwind Try to merge the blocks "entry" and "loop"

How to do it? 25.04.2018 14:33, Felix-Antoine Morin <antonixfelinski at gmail.com> >Its okay now, it is working... ;) > > > Au plaisir, > Félix-Antoine Morin > > > 769 Villeray > Montréal, Qc. > Canada > H2R 1J2 > > (514) 690.36.89 > > felixantoinemorin.com > Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/felixantoine.morin> > >

Hi all, I have one analysis pass that I want to perform on call graph SCCs. However, for each function in the SCC, I need function-level analyses, like the dominator tree and the memory dependency analysis. I’ve been told before <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30059622/using-dominatortreewrapperpass-in-callgraphsccpass> that these were not available from a CallGraphSCCPass. What would

Hi, I've been porting a project to LLVM 3.9 and found that the SCCP pass may remove calls to external functions if their return type is declared to be an empty struct. For instance: > %empty = type {} > > declare %empty @foo() > > define i32 @main() { > %1 = call %empty @foo() > ret i32 0 > } opt -sccp -S file.ll returns: > %empty = type {} > >

Hi Félix, Sanjoy Das wrote: > Félix Cloutier via llvm-dev wrote: > > Assuming that this is a bug, what are the next steps? > > Looks like you already have a very small test case -- have you tried > sticking it in a debugger to see why SCCP thinks removing the call is > okay? > > Alternatively, file a bug at llvm.org/bugs and someone will get to it. The third

The following patch adds ocfs support to blkid. --rusty # This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project: # Project Name: Ext2 filesystem utilities # This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher. # This patch includes the following deltas: # ChangeSet 1.1327 -> 1.1328 # lib/blkid/probe.c 1.15 -> 1.16 #

Folks, I'm most confused in trying to do something that (I thought) out to be mainstream and straightforward R. :-) Could you please help? I am doing an ordinary linear regression. My goal is: After a regression, to make residuals, and make a new variable which is the lagged residuals (lagged by 1). I will use this variable in a 2nd stage regression (for an error-correcting model). This

Hi, At office, we have I ISPs. I want to lightly monitor each link latency in order to decide several routing. For that, I have only one external server: 1 IP, it's an OVH dedicated server. The quick picture is http://s24.postimg.org/n3436z64l/defaul_route.png Default route is via ISP1. If OVH-server pings IP1: - the request will go through ISP1: it's OK - the reply will go through

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Rafael Espindola <espindola at google.com>wrote: > > export PATH="$LLVMPREFIX/bin:$LLVMGCCPREFIX/bin:$PATH" > > export CC="llvm-gcc -use-gold-plugin -Wl,-plugin-opt=also-emit-llvm" > > export CXX="llvm-g++ -use-gold-plugin -Wl,-plugin-opt=also-emit-llvm" > > export RANLIB=/bin/true > > export

I'm using Xcode 3 to program with LLVM and Clang (both about yesterday's latest revisions), and when I compile, I get 1501 link-time warnings. All those I read were about symbol visibility. Here's an example: ld: warning: namespace::class::method() has different visibility (default) in /usr/local/lib/libclangCodeGen.a(CodeGenAction.o) and (hidden) in