similar to: Detach specific partition LVM of XEN

Hi, I seem to have an interesting issue with vif-route. This is after an update to Xen 4.2.1, switching from xm to xl. I have 10 PV domUs on the host and two FreeBSD ones. All the PV domUs are now working nicely. Since FreeBSD has always been just slightly broken as PV I chose a HVM domU for those, but with PV drivers. Those PV drivers all blew up now after the upgrade. I''m now trying

Hi! I have a problem with my new Xen setup. I have installed Debian etch with netinstall and I''m using 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 kernel in my dom0 and 3.0.3-0-4 version xen hypervisor. I''m using four network cards on my system and using three of them as xen bridges and dom0 is using the fourth one only for it''s own. So basicly both of my virtual servers use a network card

Hi All, I was hoping to pick someone''s brain about the best way of moving a Xen disk image (which has LVM''s inside of it) to a new block-device?  I have the target DRBD device ready but unsure what''s the best & safest way to do it. I was actually tempted to mount the Xen disk image in a dom0, and make it visible via loop devices and promote that DRBD node for

Hello, i am using samba4rc2. I have problems with the bind9 dlz module, i get very long response times from interal queries. root at s-srv01:~# dig s-srv04.test.local @192.168.0.4 ; <<>> DiG 9.8.0-P4 <<>> s-srv04.test.local @192.168.0.4 ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 64478 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra;

Hi there. I have two samba servers, let's say srv01 and srv02. For that matter, both are Zentyal Server 4 and 8, respectively. In the srv01 there is samba version 4.1, which is in the network 182.168.200.0/24, and which is by the way also the gateway to both network. In the srv02 there is samba version 4.15, which is in the DMZ network 10.10.100.0/24 The first is an additional controller for

On Fri, 17 May 2024 12:36:33 -0300 Gilberto Ferreira via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi there. > I have two samba servers, let's say srv01 and srv02. For that matter, > both are Zentyal Server 4 and 8, respectively. > In the srv01 there is samba version 4.1, which is in the network > 182.168.200.0/24, and which is by the way also the gateway to both >

Hi there, anyone in the Gluster Devel list. Any fix about this issue? May 14 07:05:39 srv01 vms[9404]: [2023-05-14 10:05:39.618424 +0000] C [gf-io-uring.c:612:gf_io_uring_cq_process_some] (-->/lib/x86_64 -linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x849ae) [0x7fb4ebace9ae] -->/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a2e5) [0x7fb4ebad42e5] -->/lib /x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a1a5)

Hi I am testing running tinc in switch mode. , my topology is as follows Site 1 (tinc-srv01) -> Site 2 (tinc-srv02) I have configured the bridge interfaces with ip addresses and able to ping between bridges. I then setup a server on each site and tested layer 2 connectivity between the two servers. Topology as follows. Server 1 - *Site 1* (tinc-srv01) -> *Site 2* (tinc-srv02) - Server 2

The referenced GitHub issue now has a potential patch that could fix the problem, though it will need to be verified. Could you try to apply the patch and check if the problem persists ? On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 2:10?AM Gilberto Ferreira < gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi there, anyone in the Gluster Devel list. > > Any fix about this issue? > > May 14 07:05:39

Hi Xavi That's depend. Is it safe? I have this env production you know??? --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Em ter., 16 de mai. de 2023 ?s 07:45, Xavi Hernandez <jahernan at redhat.com> escreveu: > The referenced GitHub issue now has a potential patch that could fix the > problem, though it will need to be verified. Could you try to apply the

Hi Gilberto, On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 12:56?PM Gilberto Ferreira < gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Xavi > That's depend. Is it safe? I have this env production you know??? > It should be safe, but I wouldn't test it on production. Can't you try it in any test environment before ? Xavi > > --- > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira > (47) 99676-7530 -

Ok. No problem. I can test it in a virtual environment. Send me the path. Oh but the way, I don't compile gluster from scratch. I was used the deb file from https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/Debian/ --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Em ter., 16 de mai. de 2023 ?s 09:21, Xavi Hernandez <jahernan at redhat.com> escreveu: >

Hi again I just noticed that there is some updates from glusterd apt list --upgradable Listing... Done glusterfs-client/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] glusterfs-common/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] glusterfs-server/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] libgfapi0/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] libgfchangelog0/unknown 11.0-2 amd64

On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 4:00?PM Gilberto Ferreira < gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi again > I just noticed that there is some updates from glusterd > > apt list --upgradable > Listing... Done > glusterfs-client/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] > glusterfs-common/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] > glusterfs-server/unknown 11.0-2

Anybody also has this error? May 14 07:05:39 srv01 vms[9404]: [2023-05-14 10:05:39.618424 +0000] C [gf-io-uring.c:612:gf_io_uring_cq_process_some] (-->/lib/x86_64 -linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x849ae) [0x7fb4ebace9ae] -->/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a2e5) [0x7fb4ebad42e5] -->/lib /x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a1a5) [0x7fb4ebad41a5] ) 0-: Assertion failed: May 14

Hello, in the last days I switched from Xen 4.2.1 to Xen 4.2.2 (source from git repository tag 4.2.2) commit a125ec6a4a2f028f97f0bdd8946d347a36dbe76b Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Date: Tue Apr 23 18:42:55 2013 +0200 update Xen version to 4.2.2 My "base system" is a debian squeeze. For Xen I use the xl toolstack. Since updating to 4.2.2 the autosave and

Can someone help me because I don't how this ha+ppening without messing it ? /var/log/samba/log.wb-COMPANY cli_rpc_open failed on pipe \NETLOGON to machine SRV01. Error was Write error: Broken pipe [2005/10/27 12:15:01, 0] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:cli_rpc_close(1767) cli_rpc_open failed on pipe \NETLOGON to machine SRV01. Error was Write error: Broken pipe [2005/10/27 12:15:01, 0]

Hi all, I've got a (pacemaker + drbd) cluster running VMs. When the VM is running on another node, the local storage is Secondary, meaning that it can't be read or otherwise touched. As such, virsh thinks there is no storage and constantly prints errors like: ==== Aug 14 19:25:24 mk-a02n01.digimer.ca libvirtd[1655]: 2020-08-14 23:25:24.812+0000: 1679: error : qemuOpenFileAs:3119 :

-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 14:32:31 -0800 > Von: Matthieu Patou <mat at samba.org> > An: samba at lists.samba.org > Betreff: Re: [Samba] samba4 binddlz performance > On 11/19/2012 07:11 AM, Thomas Manninger wrote: > > Hello, > > > > i am using samba4rc2. > > > > I have problems with the bind9 dlz module, i get

Hi, I have currently a department called HRM which have their own share /data/hrm Within that share is a folder called recruitment. We recently hired an external recruiter to do some work for us. The folder is /data/hrm/recruitment How can I enforce that this person can only read and write in this directory? Look below, is this the way to go? How would you handle this? My