similar to: Re: Xen 3.0.1: create NAT Rule, Internet ppp0 stops

hi, i installed a fresh Xen 3.0.1 installation and setup ppp0 (Dom0) for Internet. Everything is working, till i want to create the MASQ rule, for Internet (DomU and real clients): iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ppp0 -j MASQUERADE after that, i can''t ping anything to the internet. My old Firewall Setup used for Xen 2.0.7 stopps working too. Also "iptables -L" over SSH

Sorry to post this here, but since last week I've posted to Fedora's mailing list, pptp-devel's list, and linuxgeneral forum. No one has given much for answers, or the people that have replied have not understood what I'm looking for. Hoping someone here can. For the record, I'm doing this on FC3 not CentOS. Anyway, if anyone can provide assistance I would be very appreciative.

Hello everyone! Well i want to know, if there is a way to specify a physical nic (like eth0 or eth1) to a domU and how can i do it. The server has two nics, what i want to do is assign physical nic (eth0) to the dom0 and assign physical nic (eht1) to the domU. I appreciate your help. Regards Ivan ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a

Ok ladies and gents, I give up! I just can''t find a solution to the problem. Setup: I have a linux box with 2.4.22-1.2197.nptl kernel running 2 eth and one ppp connection over one of the eth for VPN tunneling. I have 2 needs: - masq and forward internal lan hosts via the tunnel on PPP and then on to the big internet. No problem there. All works fine. - Forward ppp0 native

Hi. Before start i need to say that i lost a lot of weekends trying every single posible solution on the net. So this i s my last resource. This is NOT an ERROR, is just help to make something work. (sorry for my english) Hi have 3 zones loc eth0 => here we have 192.168.1.0/24 with 12 IP''s/PC''s I can subdivide in 2 tematics zones but if not needed there is no reason to

Hello guys, I have two ISP's connected to my router. One via eth2, second one via ADSL modem, with ppoe doing on my Centos 5 . The problem I have is, that when ADSL fails , interface ppp0 is removed. This also removes my static routes configured for this interface. I do not want that, as I have load balancing configured and default route is removed when ppp0 interface disapears. This is my

Hi all .... I Have installed Bering LRP on Many sites and I am very pleased with the capabilites of shorewall. Howerver I came across a prob that I am unaware ot its solution. Using shorewall 2.0.2f Kernel 2.4.24 On one Site LRP box serves internet outgoing connections through ( static IP ) a DSL line AND an incoming dial-in PPP conection. My shorewall configuration Is based upon the fact

Hi, i connect to the internet over my eth4 interface using pppoe. The internet always comes on ppp0. I am trying to setup an L2TP/IPSEC VPN and i am reading http://www.shorewall.net/IPSEC-2.6.html#RW-L2TP I notice in the example the interfaces file is given as: #ZONE INTERFACE BROADCAST OPTIONS net eth0 detect routefilter loc eth1

I am frustrated. This is a dual boot box, Win XP (Spanish) and CentOS 4.4. The phone company man came today and installed ADSL to the WinXP side and that works fine. I can't get the box online, while in CentOS 4.4. The ADSL router has a fixed IP address (192.168.1.1) and he configured it to get the IP from the ISP via DHCP and get the DNS servers automatically. When I try that on CentOS (which

Hello, if starting /etc/init.d/krb5kdc, kerberos binds to eth1 and the *current* ip of ppp0. # netstat -nap | grep :750\\b udp 0 0 91.9.220.166:750 0.0.0.0:* 3180/krb5kdc udp 0 0 192.168.0.1:750 0.0.0.0:* 3180/krb5kdc # netstat -nap | grep :88\\b tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:88

Dear friends, a pointer to howto very welcome please. Shorewall runs on my laptop. Now is quite well configured when it is attached to my LANs (home or office). From times to times I use it while traveling and connect through a GPRS modem which shows up as ppp0. What is the simplest way to configure shorewall so that when ppp0 goes up (well after shorewall is already running) it will treat

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118 ------- Additional Comments From owlman@ss.pub.ro 2004-01-05 15:46 ------- Well, here I am again. I just spent one hour tracking the newest instance of the bug. At the end of it I found a workaround and a new direction to search for it. I remind everyone that the machine is a Slackware box with a 2.4.23- vanilla kernel.

when doing somehitng like ip rule add fwmark 3 nat 200.42.75.183 table ppp0 prio 1 (the idea is that packets that match the fwmark 3 change their source address to 200.42.75.183)..it first apply the nat and then routes to table ppp0 right? in such case the, nat, why may be nat not being applyed? cause it doesnt work at all..it goes to that interface but does not nat the src address of the package.

>Message: 23 >Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:11:59 -0400 >From: Dan Halbert <halbert at everyzing.com> >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Newbie ADSL configuration, ppp0 can't activate & > config not found >Message-ID: <469830EF.3080601 at everyzing.com> >mailing-lists at computer2.com wrote: > I am frustrated. This is a dual boot box, Win XP (Spanish) and

Hello, I would appreciate any feedback/suggestions on my Shorewall configuration for a standalone laptop Debian Squeeze configuration for ppp0 and wlan0, set out below: ------------------ My current system: ------------------ I have successfuly configured Shorewall 4.4.11.6 on my standalone Debian Squeeze laptop for a ppp0 (Mobile broadband) connection using GNOME PPP, works great (refer to

Hi, i wonder if there's some howto information to bridge ppp0 to eth0 my distribution is a Hoary Ubuntu 5.04 i install : apt-get install bridge-utlis what i need it's connect to internet thru a modem 56k (ppp0) and then give internet access to my laptop thru a crosspair cable attached to a eth0 in my linux box . i was following the article http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8261

Hi, I currently connect to my ISP via my adsl modem in bridge mode and PPPoE. I am due to put a second PPPoE ISP onto my firewall box which will give me ppp0 (general) and ppp1 (static leased line). The static leased line will run a number of services on its static IP and it is therefore imperative to make sure rules defined for the static line are assigned to the correct interface. I need this to

>Message: 23 >Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:11:59 -0400 >From: Dan Halbert <halbert at everyzing.com> >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Newbie ADSL configuration, ppp0 can't activate & > config not found >To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> >Message-ID: <469830EF.3080601 at everyzing.com> mailing-lists at computer2.com wrote: <snip>

is possible to setup any bandwith resource control in a ppp0 interface? i''d like to distribute bandwith equally between pcs in a network, and inside each pc, equally between protocols... is this possible? all the documentation refers to eth0 type interfaces... so? -- $~ who | grep -i brunette | date ; cd ~ ; unzip ; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime ; umount; sleep Diego

>Message: 26 >Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 07:59:09 -0400 >From: Dan Halbert <halbert at everyzing.com> >Subject: Re: SOLVED: Re: [CentOS] Newbie ADSL configuration, ppp0 > can't activate & config not found >Message-ID: <469A0C0D.3030400 at everyzing.com> >Great! By the way, you should not even need to specify the DNS >servers. >In the DHCP