similar to: Veth0 missing

Hello, Since my last update of xen, I am having problems with bridges and xen. When I want to start a bridge on the dom0 (to run a domU in a different vlan than the default) I run /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge start netdev=eth0.302 bridge=xen-br302 antispoof=no where eth0.302 is an interface associated with my vlan 302 (it tags with this vlan identifier). The problem I have is that it

Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0-unstable-1-amd64 Version: 3.0-unstable+hg11292-2 Severity: important My server is a dell 2950 server. Before the dom0 rebooting bug ocurred, xen was well even for hvm domU. By now i have tried xen-hypervisor-3.0-amd64 (3.0.2+hg9697-2) and xen-hypervisor-3.0-unstable-1-amd64 (3.0-unstable+hg11292-2), but both of them are unusable for me. for

i am currently not in singapore from the 6th to 10th Aug 2008. For anything urgent, please contact Daren at daren@hwzcorp.com Thanks. Best Regards, Choon Kiat _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

i am currently not in singapore from the 6th to 10th Aug 2008. For anything urgent, please contact Daren at daren@hwzcorp.com Thanks. Best Regards, Choon Kiat _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hello, Queries: 1 - what is the best RAID (0,1,5,10,50) for server running very, very VM instances ??? 2 - and config of stripes/element sizes (32, 64, 128, 256, etc, KB) ?? 3 - in the configuration of VM, exit one difference in performance between image file (disk:/) or LVM partition (phy:/) ??? any URL or docs for read about this theme ? mmm.. it is all for moment. thanks -- -- Victor

When does vif0.0 get created? Is there some shell magic? I''m trying to figure out how to do a similar peth1/veth1 split for eth1. -- Nicholas Lee http://stateless.geek.nz gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF 5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Dear I need create second bridge xenbr1 for separate traffic between my virtual machine , I following this step but show message that Link veth0 is missing, how I can create veth0 ? When I run script for create xenbr1 ./network-bridge netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 start Shwo this message Link veth0 is missing. This may be because you have reached the limit of the number of interfaces that the

Hello, I have got something strange when I done a /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge status : 201: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,10000> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether 00:15:17:8d:cb:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff And when I done a /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge I have got this : Link veth0 1 is missing. This may be because you have reached the limit of the number of

I try to bring up xend but get this error in the xend-debug.log /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge: line 62: ip: command not found Link veth0 is missing. This may be because you have reached the limit of the number of interfaces that the loopback driver supports. If the loopback driver is a module, you may raise this limit by passing it as a parameter (nloopbacks=<N>); if the driver is

> > When you run xend it runs network-bridge which creates the bridge, > > renames eth0->peth0 and veth0->eth0 and brings the new eth0 back up. > > kewl, thx Ian. i see network-route doesnt do this. i think > thats a good thing. do you forsee that changing? I expect that in most routed configurations people use their own network script rather than using the

Hi, I am using Xen 4.1.1 with Linux 3.0.1 kernel. Previously (Xen 3.4.4 and linux kernel 2.6.18) Xen by default created veth0 <--> vif0.0 pair in dom0. With Xen 4.1.1 these pairs are missing in dom0. Using command ''ip link add type veth'' I can create veth0 and veth1 but vif0.0 is still missing in dom0. (When new domU created I can see vif1.x created) Could you please help

Hi, I am using Xen 4.1.1 with Linux 3.0.1 kernel. Previously (Xen 3.4.4 and linux kernel 2.6.18) Xen by default created veth0 <--> vif0.0 pair in dom0. With Xen 4.1.1 these pairs are missing in dom0. Using command ''ip link add type veth'' I can create veth0 and veth1 but vif0.0 is still missing in dom0. (When new domU created I can see vif1.x created) Could you please help

Hi, I try to get networking running with xen 3.2, but it seems I fail miserably. I am on sles10sp1, with xen 3.2.0, and kernel rpm''s installed from SP2. I configured in /etc/sysconfig/network the NETWORK_LIST: NETWORK_LIST="bridge,0,default,00:DE:AD:BE:EF,192.168.8.13/24,dhcp-off" but an ifconfig xenbr0 still shows the mac address of peth0 fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff. Initially, I

> That''s great, except when you need *two* bridges, for two > independent subnets, and there is no, as far as I can see, peth1. You can have multiple vethX interfaces on recent builds -- see netback/loopback.c. I think the current default is a rather miserly 1 (and should be increased), but can be set on the command line. Ian > Em Wednesday 14 September 2005 16:30, John

> Hi. what creates veth0 and vifu.0, when? what''s the > underlying architecture behind them? Just trying to > understand the internals. netback/loopback.c creates them. It''s effectively a point to point link, allowing domain 0 to connect on to the bridge in the same manner that other domains do. (before, packets to domain 0 were short-cutted and came off the

Hi, yes, it is. Anyway, below are some of the diagnostics I have tried. Linux box Win95 Box ========= =========== hostname: saturn tempest ip: 192.168.0.2 192.168.0.1 Below are the diagnostics that I have tried and I ahve logged them: 1. From

Hi, I have the following errors: Panic on CPU0: FATAL PAGE FAULT [error_code=0002] Faulting linear address: fbfb1100 More details in snapshots as below as I don''t have serial console cables thus unable to get full details of the errors which I will try to get one and send the full error if needed: http://choon.net/xenerrors/Image000.jpg http://choon.net/xenerrors/Image001.jpg

Hi all, I was directed by Luke to send to the samba digest. Hope someone can help. Thanks. p/s: Pls cc to chng@comm.mot.com rgds, choon > > hi choon, > > this is a standard issue that if you ask on the samba digest > (samba@samba.anu.edu.au) you are likely to get about three replies to :-) > > i'm not answering too many questions at the mo: i have r.s.i. >

Hi list. I started with Xen yesterday, but I am facing a bit of a problem. My system had always configure eth0 with 10.0.0.4/8 I am using Xen unstable source (on Debian sid) Now I installed Xen, rebooted the machine, and first the usual network is coming up and then the xend will be started. I''ll end up with this, but I am wondering if this should be the way of things to be

I'm new to the list. hopefully my question is correctly placed here... I'd installed my samba server 3.5.6 on debian squeeze in a openvz container that uses venet. I'd love to keep it that way but I'm not sure if that is ok. Do you use samba server with venet or do I have to change to veth? I already read http://wiki.openvz.org/Differences_between_venet_and_veth and I don't