similar to: Xen-users mailing list

I'm having a pretty serious rsync bug, which I've submitted to the Debian bug system. But as the rsync maintainer there seems to be a bit slow in fixing problems, I thought perhaps I should report it here as well. I'm using rsync 2.6.2 on a Debian woody system, with libc 2.2.5. I have rsync running daily to mirror the Debian archives, mainly for i386 files. The command I use is

On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:59:19 +0200 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Am 28.03.2018 um 16:50 schrieb Lapin Blanc: > > Thank you for the tip, i'll use it, but how come it's correctly > > encoded in the DN and not in the attribute ? > > Is it related to the ldif format or something ? > > no idea and hence *do not* reply

On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:32:33 +0200 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Am 28.03.2018 um 17:21 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:59:19 +0200 > > Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> Am 28.03.2018 um 16:50 schrieb Lapin Blanc: >

On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:22:16 +0200 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Am 28.03.2018 um 18:07 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:32:33 +0200 > > Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> Am 28.03.2018 um 17:21 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:

I have a list of groups of xy positions I want to set to 0 in an array full of 1s. When the assignments are done directly from the list, they are incorrect, while if I use a temporary array derived from the list the assignments are correct. The following example will hopefully make my problem clearer. The matrices z and zz are initialised with 1. The z and zz values at coordinates in

Hey guys, Pasi mentioned on Li''s (and Owen''s) patches which provide TRIM/UNMAP support to the Linux backend/frontend that: " Isn''t the generic name for this functionality "discard" in Linux? and "trim" being the ATA specific discard-implementation, and "scsi unmap" the SAS/SCSI specific discard-implementation? Just

Hi, Same problem for me, any clue ? Gana?l. owen@isrl.uiuc.edu@lists.samba.org on 07/31/2003 01:42:21 AM Envoy? par : samba-bounces+ganael.laplanche=edf.fr@lists.samba.org Pour : samba@lists.samba.org cc : Objet : [Samba] groupmember list fails with 3.0.0b3 and LDAP Hi all, I've been working on a PDC with group mapping with Samba-3.0.0Beta3 with OpenLDAP-2.1.22. Things

Am 28.03.2018 um 16:50 schrieb Lapin Blanc: > Thank you for the tip, i'll use it, but how come it's correctly encoded > in the DN and not in the attribute ? > Is it related to the ldif format or something ? no idea and hence *do not* reply privately on mailing-lists i just recognize base64 when i see it proper mail clients respect List-Post: <mailto:samba at

Hi, I switched to Fedora Core 5 and I now have a few problems when booting a domU virtual machine with Xen (as provided by the FC5 installation). I get the following boot trace when trying to bot a domU: Mounting proc filesystem Mounting sysfs filesystem Creating /dev Creating initial device nodes Setting up hotplug. Creating block device nodes. Creating root device. Mounting root filesystem.

I receive stdin input from "samba user syncpasswords" in my python script. The user is created with ' Active Directory Users and Computers', and have some accentuated characters in their givenName and/or familyName (sn) When parsing the diff, the CN reads of, but weird characters appears in the attributes instead of the right name : INFO:root:DN found: CN=Arsène

>From: xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com >To: kanghua151@msn.com >Subject: Welcome to the "Xen-devel" mailing list >Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 07:54:04 +0000 > >Welcome to the Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com mailing list! > >To post to this list, send your email to: > > xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > >General information about the mailing list is at:

On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:54:16 +0200 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Am 28.03.2018 um 18:47 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:22:16 +0200 > > Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> Am 28.03.2018 um 18:07 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:

Alright, go ahead with it. —Owen > On Nov 17, 2014, at 4:58 AM, Daniil Troshkov <troshkovdanil at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > I have not found test case. (It is because we have no target using "ExpandInsertToVectorThroughStack"). > But I tested it for target currently not included in llvm trunk. > > This fix correct and trivial, so I'm offering

That doesn't actually give you a guarantee that they won't be split up. Phases other than the scheduler may insert instructions in the middle of block (constant island pass, for example). Pseudo-instructions are the canonical answer to that problem. --Owen On Sep 17, 2013, at 11:09 PM, Micah Villmow <micah.villmow at smachines.com> wrote: > I used the A9 schedule as an

I used the A9 schedule as an example: http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/ARM/ARMScheduleA9.td The documentation could use more clarity, but this is how I was able to do it to always get two specific instructions to be scheduled together. ________________________________________ From: reed kotler [rkotler at mips.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 8:54 PM To: Micah Villmow

The EC2 instance that I run Dovecot on (personal mail server) was forcibly "retired" yesterday, and as a result I ended up rebuilding from backups. In the process I switched from Ubuntu Precise to Ubuntu Xenial (12.04 to 16.04), and this in turn caused me to upgrade Dovecot from 2.0.19 to 2.0.22. Now, although accessing mail seems to work OK using my various clients, I am seeing

Reed, Couldn't you also use instruction scheduling classes and specify that the second instruction has a bypass from the first instruction? The scheduler should always schedule them together in that case. Micah > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On > Behalf Of reed kotler > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013

On 09/17/2013 04:51 PM, Micah Villmow wrote: > Reed, > Couldn't you also use instruction scheduling classes and specify that the second instruction has a bypass from the first instruction? The scheduler should always schedule them together in that case. > > Micah > I'm not sure exactly what you mean. Can you point me to an example of that? TIA. Reed >>

Am 28.03.2018 um 18:07 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:32:33 +0200 > Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> >> Am 28.03.2018 um 17:21 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:59:19 +0200 >>> Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>>

Owen: Can you clarify what kinds of dynamic linker issues you are seeing? I speculate that cross-library dependency resolution is high on the list, but what else? shap On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 21:44 -0500, Owen Anderson wrote: > On May 13, 2008, at 9:22 PM, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > > Owen: > > > > This is not correct. As the API stabilizes, it will become > >