similar to: XFS and quota

Have amd64 xen 3.1 installed on debian etch. Have all the domu file systems in lvm. Problem 1 If I have a xfs files system when I mount it on domu I get this error: Filesystem "sda5": Disabling barriers, not supported by the underlying device XFS mounting filesystem sda5 Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: sda5 If I mount with nobarriers the message goes away. If I mount under

hi all, I hope you can help me with a strange quota/nfs/XFS behavior... I'm using Centos 5.6 on both a nfs server and client. Both are 64-bit, and using a recent kernel: NFS server: Linux fs2.priv 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue May 31 13:22:04 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux NFS client: Linux nx8.priv 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue May 31 13:22:04 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64

Hi, I just finished writing a small plugin that reports XFS project quota in de IMAP component of Dovecot (1.2, currently). It was written to fill the needs of our organization but someone else might find this useful as well. In its current form it's not suitable for inclusion in the generic quota backend (see ?Drawbacks?). Features: - every mailbox/folder can have its own project ID; -

We have a number of home directory servers running CentOS 6 exporting XFS file systems over NFSv3 We enable user quotas for all users - with a relatively small allocation to each user Every now and then, we get a user that has a quota mismatch - where they are (usually) over their quota, but their actual usage (via du) is significantly less This happens on any of the servers I suspect that the

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On 08/09/18 14:57, mark wrote: > >> Can I go to an existing xfs file system, and apply a soft quota to each >> user on it? If I do, can I then run a report, and see who's using how >> much, or does it only apply to files created after the quotas are >> applied? > > After remounting XFS filesystem with option "usrquota" you

Hi all, I have a quota problem with xfs (xfsprogs 3.1.7+b1 on debian GNU/Linux 7 -- wheezy) and samba-4.1.19. If I set a user quota to say 10GB, windows explorer reports a 20GB quota of which none used. If I change quota to x, windows explorer reports 2x space of which none used. So I assume samba is somehow getting (albeit incomplete and incorrect) xfs quota info from operating system. disks

Hi, I have a strange problem with user quotas enabled on a xfs filesystem and samba 3.0.21c: When a standard block device (e.g. /dev/sdc1) is used for the fs, quota works like expected: /dev/sdc1 on /mnt/tmp type xfs (rw,usrquota) output from level quota:10 debug: [2006/04/19 14:38:48, 10] lib/sysquotas.c:sys_get_quota(394) sys_get_quota() uid(4004, 4004) [2006/04/19 14:38:48, 10]

Hi, I managed to configure project quotas on a xfs device on a centos 6.5 server. (just pquota in fstab, no grquota, rebooted server....) Reporting the quota settings and usage looks good. But mounting a smb-share with the proect quota enabled on my os x client shows much less space used (3GB) and 0% free. Currently 650 GB are used, the quota limit is set to 1TB. My user I'm mounting the

Can I go to an existing xfs file system, and apply a soft quota to each user on it? If I do, can I then run a report, and see who's using how much, or does it only apply to files created after the quotas are applied? mark

On 08/09/18 14:57, mark wrote: > Can I go to an existing xfs file system, and apply a soft quota to each > user on it? If I do, can I then run a report, and see who's using how > much, or does it only apply to files created after the quotas are applied? > After remounting XFS filesystem with option "usrquota" you can issue the command similar to: xfs_quota -x -c

I wrote into the list a few days ago about XFS Group Quotas not working in Samba 3.0.21c and 3.0.22. I have confirmed that if I uninstall 3.0.22 and reinstall 3.0.13, when I change an XFS group quota on Linux and mount a share that belongs to that group, if I look at the "Properties" for that share in Windows, Windows tells me that the "size" of the share is equal to the

Hello, quota support is out of action on xfs filesystem on my centos 4.x . Problem is that i haven't these file #include <linux/dqblk_xfs.h> on my system. Solution is simple. After instalation xfsprogs-devel you get necessary files, but you must use another header file in dovecot/src/plugins/quota/quota-fs.c. Instead <linux/dqblk_xfs.h> you should use <xfs/xqm.h>.

Hi all, is any one aware quotas not working in 5,5? I'm using XFS as a file system. My fstab has the appropriate usrquota,grpquota but when I try to run; quotacheck -cug /foo I get; quotacheck: Can't find filesystem to check or filesystem not mounted with quota option. I already have a large amount of data in the mount. Do quotas get implemented on only empty filesystems and

Hi All, I have a very strange problem that I'm unable to pinpoint at the moment. For some reason I am simply unable to get xfs_quotas to report correctly on a freshly installed, fully patched CentOS 6 box. I have specified all the same options as on another machine which *is* reporting quota LABEL=TEST /exports/TEST xfs inode64,nobarrier,delaylog,usrquota,grpquota 0 0 xfs_quota -xc

hi Jan, I've attached Yu-Chan's quota.h -- does this look familiar to you? It is clearly not the quota.h from the XFS CVS as I had originally thought. It may be the one from the XFS 1.1 CDs, which is a Redhat-based, XFS-enabled distro, so would have an earlier version of your VFS quota patches (via -ac kernel). Either way, it doesn't really matter. We need to fix Samba, and a

Hi, We use XFS, Samba and Quotas. Until now, we haven't had any issues with Samba versions up to 3.0.13. But we are testing Samba 3.0.22 and noticing that when we set group quotas on XFS volumes, the quotas are NOT getting reflected on Windows XP workstations when you look at the "Properties" of a Samba share. With 3.0.13 and below, the group quotas come through fine. In both

Hi, I try to enable userquota an a new xfs filesystem. Its centos 6.5, the filesystem is mounted with usrquota, the server was rebooted. I thought xfs_quota -x -c 'limit bsoft=20000m bhard=22000m username' /home would set the quota for that user. But I do get an error: Command limit not found. Did I miss something? Any hints/how to beside the official sgi xfs and redhat doc

Hi All, I have this very odd issue where after a migration we have some users who have quotas showing 8192.0EB in use, when in reality on disk there is only a couple hundred megabytes. The host in question is a: * CentOS 6.3 host with mostly latest patches (except latest glibc patches) * running in SELinux Enforcing mode (Permissive doesn't seem to help) * all file systems are on Logical

On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 12:59:33PM +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote: > Hi there, hey Ralf. > sorry for being semi-off-topic, but since this has at least *soemthing* to do > with XFS I hope you forgive me. :-) > > I'm trying to compile Samba 2.2.4 under Debian 2.2 (stable). I'm running a > kernel compiled from yesterday's XFS 2.4.18 kernel source (I'm mentioning

greetings, does anyone know, if it is possible to propagate somehow the XFS "directory tree quota" status to SMB workstation client free space report? currently the client sees total free space of share's partition (instead of tree quota free space). when the tree quota limit is reached, the write attempts fail, but free space report shows enough space, so this is confusing. I