similar to: Strange TCP-Problem with GPL PV 0.8.8

Hi, I've some problems with this network : [ host1 eth0: 10.22.2.4/8 ] [ host2 eth0:10.22.2.5/8 default route host3] \ / SWITCH internet | | |

Hi, I have a few questions about the inner workings of netfilter (a graphical layout of my network setup @ https://aequorin.homeunix.net:62389/local/media/network-graph.png) 1) These are the syslog entries for some simple connection tests. Shorewall/netfilter has been set to record all stateful connections SSH is recognized as phys(eth0) -> $FW traffic. This is because PHYSIN is

Hi * in xend-config.xsp I have: ******************************** (network-script network-route) (vif-bridge xen-br0) (vif-script vif-bridge) ******************************** and in /etc/network/interfaces ********************************* iface eth0 inet static address 0.0.0.0 auto xen-br0 iface xen-br0 inet static pre-up ifconfig eth0 up pre-up brctl addbr xen-br0 pre-up brctl addif

Hello, I have the need to connect 2 remote site with vpn, the windows pc of the 2 site it can share the HD and printer. This is my configuration : LOCAL NETWORK A : ip from 192.168.10.2 to 192.168.10.99 | | | | eth0: 192.168.10.1 FIREWALL A : ( with debian ; openvpn ver. 2.0.beta15 ; shorewall ver 2.0.11 ) eth1 : xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ( pubblic ip address ) | | | | INTERNET | | | eth1 :

I''m working on setting up a new router/server/etc. box. I''m using Proxmox as the base system (Debian Lenny basically). I''m trying to figure out the right way to configure Shorewall on it. I''ve looked at some of the bridging info but they seem to all be talking about single-interface setups. Could someone look over my setup and give me some input into the

Hello everybody, I have an odd problem with iptables using a Xen bridge setup. I don''t know if it would be better to post to netfilter Mailing-List. But I hope someone here know how to solve it. If it''s OT here, please let me know. I''ll try to do a little bit ASCII-Graphics to explain the topo better: _________ ________

Hello All, I am trying to implement OpenVPN on Fedora core Linux 3 with the latest pathces installed. This server is used only as firewall/internet gateway/proxy/VPN server, with kernel 2.6.1-1.27.FC3 and kernel 2.6.1-1.27.FC3 SMP It has two NIC''s eth0 (10.0.0.150) connected to ADSL, eth1 (192.168.3.12) connected to the local network. I use shorewall 2.4 on this machine. I like to test

Dear All, I try to upgrade, my old shorewall from 4.4.13-3 to 4.5.2.3-1 on CentOS, after upgrade i can''t start shorewall with this message: "/Shorewall: Address Ranges require the Multiple Match capability in your kernel and iptables/" I try to search on the net about this, but no still no light. Somebody can help me? Great appreciate for any help. Regards,

The bridging documentation (http://shorewall.net/2.0/bridge.html) has been expanded and there is a refresh of the bridging code (ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Bridging and http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Bridging). -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

Dear Xen-Users, I use Xen 3.1.0_15042 on my OpenSuSE-10.3-computer. Without starting the xen-kernel I can connect my second computer via my native computer to the internet. After starting the xen-kernel the xen-bridge came automatically up. How can I configure the xen-bridge or the xen-devices? I get routing problems: Feb 20 18:31:36 intel6550 kernel: martian source 217.237.149.142 from

Hi Vene, Would appreciate any help you can give as I am not sure which NAT you are talking about. A little more background. I am replacing a Windows 2000 routing and remote access machine that was acting as the gateway and performing NAT for Internet access for our local clients. In this setup the cisco VPN clients had no problem connecting to the vpn concentrator. The only difference in any

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=479 Summary: tunnel0 and br0 Product: iptables Version: 1.2.11 Platform: i386 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: iptables AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy: tom@tomdeb.org I have a ipsec

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=479 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-05-22 14:42 MET ------- It is not entirely clear what you are trying to show with that LOG line. How is the traffic flowing, what do you expect? And why is it visible in plaintext on the br0 device? Please also include your kernel version. -- Configure bugmail:

We have been using Xen as our vm only recently (about a year now). We recently started to look at the tcp flow control that is coming in and out of the VM. Our configuration is that a physical interface on the host, peth1, is connect to vif1.1 by bridge br1, vif1.1 is instantiated as eth1 inside the vm. We have a data source attached to eth1 that over subscribe the data capacity of peth1.

Hi, there: I have installed xen(2.6.18.8-xen) and had successfully started domU guests (one or two) from dom0. However, I am not able to start the network for domU machines. Following is the information from my linux box. After the it is started: $ ifconfig eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:C9:D6:65:DB inet addr:XXX.XXX.10.133 Bcast:XXX.XXX.10.255 Mask:255.255.255.0

Hi, I just installed Xen in Ubuntu Hardy. DomU is not accessible either from Dom0 or external network. I used default set up network-bridge/vif-bridge from xend-conf.sxp. Bridge has got default name eth1 which is my default ethernet interface. Before creating DomU: root@jaguar-0:/home/longina# xm list Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0

hello, I want to configure 2 interface like this eth0 for LAN is 172.16.0.3 eth1 for SAN is 192.168.0.13 I want all VM can access to all network my configuration is : (network-script ''network-bridge netdev=eth0'') to have peth0 and I have a peth0 interface (network-script ''network-bridge netdev=eth1'') to have peth1but I don''t have a peth1 interface

Hello, I have started playing around with docker (https://www.docker.io/) and am having trouble to integrate the "docker0" bridge it creates on the fly into my shorewall setup (version 4.5.16.1) on debian testing. IP forwarding is on and I have defined a "doc" ipv4 zone and the interfaces has an entry like so, > doc docker0

When does vif0.0 get created? Is there some shell magic? I''m trying to figure out how to do a similar peth1/veth1 split for eth1. -- Nicholas Lee http://stateless.geek.nz gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF 5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

I have seen those documents, I did not see anything that indicates how _automatic_ bridge configuration could be enabled with xl. For my specific set up I have two bridges (xenbr0 -> peth0 & xenbr1 -> peth1). If I have to configure this manually with ifcfg scripts I will, but if an automatic method is provided or is possible with xl I'd prefer to use that. -Gene On Thu, Jan 29,