similar to: Problem - Boot Xen 3.0.1 Guest using NFS

Peter Farrow wrote: >Rc.local is used explicitly for the running of scripts after the system >has booted. >Putting your own firewall scripts in here is a good place to put them >rather than relying on "service iptables save", this is because the >visibility of changes is poor when using the "service iptables save" >some one either inadvertantly or otherwise

>>> And I stand corrected Patrick.? Apparently some clients are stuffing bad values into packets and moving the code to save the MAC resolves the deafness I observed. Commit 8a00e49 is the change. -- -Gene <<< OK; I was about to ask you a few wiershark captures... I looked at the last commit and I think if (mode->PxeReplyReceived) pkt_v4 =

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:02 PM, <jeff_sloan at selinc.com> wrote: > from: Jeff Sloan <jeff_sloan at selinc.com> > > Update UEFI PXE proxyDHCP handling. > > This patch is based on commit ID 8a00e49 > > Modify two files to specify valid ip addresses. These files are efi/pxe.c > and efi/udp.c. 1) In commit 2e266c35, I proposed using UseDefaultAddress. As I

How can I run command in containers on the host? Just like the lxc command lxc-attach. I run : virsh -c lxc:/// lxc-enter-namespace fedora2 --noseclabel /bin/ls but get error: libvirt: error : Expected at least one file descriptor error: internal error: Child process (14930) unexpected exit status 125 Here is my libvirt.xml <domain type='lxc'> <name>fedora2</name>

Hi, Im getting this messages in the /var/log/messages about my dhcp server. I assume there is nothing to worry about, but just in case I have to ask. Are these messages fine? Do I need to specify the interface on which the dhcp server should listen to? ... dhcpd: Multiple interfaces match the same subnet: eth0 eth1 dhcpd: Multiple interfaces match the same shared network: eth0 eth1

The UEFI PXE boot DHCP/proxyDHCP issue is very timely. I am working on that very topic now. Our scenario is a manufacturing environment set up to format and load/install custom hard drive images in our systems. Our environment: This is a manufacturing floor setup where we build computers for our customers. We have two servers and a client in the mix, all connected via Ethernet (IPv4 only).

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> > And I stand corrected Patrick. Apparently some clients are > stuffing bad values into packets and moving the code to save the MAC resolves > the deafness I observed. > Commit 8a00e49 is the change. > -- > -Gene > <<< > > OK; I was about to ask you a

from: Jeff Sloan <jeff_sloan at selinc.com> Update UEFI PXE proxyDHCP handling. This patch is based on commit ID 8a00e49 Modify two files to specify valid ip addresses. These files are efi/pxe.c and efi/udp.c. In efi/pxe.c: In net_parse_dhcp function. If ProxyOffer has been received, start with DhcpAck packet since it is the most complete. This requires a minimum of changes to the

Hi CentOS users, I have install CentOS 7 in VirtualBox, and want the guest CentOS using dynamic IP address (The network type is bridged). I find the guest CentOS can works OK when using ethernet cable, but can't get IP address via wireless network. I also posted this issue on stackoverflow

I'm just wondering if anyone else is not getting a DHCPv4 address in Anaconda, using the CentOS 8 Boot.iso image? I get an IPv6 Autoconfig address, but it doesn't want to pick up a DHCPv4. This is in a Hyper-V Gen2 VM, connected to the same network all my other dev VMs are on, and picking up DHCPv4 without issue. And, congratz to the CentOS team on 2 releases in a week (or so)! Gregory

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:08:26AM -0800, Patrick Masotta via Syslinux wrote: > This patch adds to the core EFI image booting capabilities. > It was tested on VMware EFI clients and HP Elitebook EFI notebooks, > only on PXE environments but it should work on non-PXE scenarios as well. > > Feedback appreciated. > > Best, > Patrick > > Signed-off-by: Patrick Masotta

OK, looks like I'm seeing this with the DVD image as well. Gregory Young -----Original Message----- From: CentOS <centos-bounces at centos.org> On Behalf Of Young, Gregory Sent: September 24, 2019 2:05 PM To: centos at centos.org Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 8 Boot.iso image DHCP4 not working? I'm just wondering if anyone else is not getting a DHCPv4 address in Anaconda, using the

I'm using Fedora Core 4. with packages of Samba, OpenLDAP, Berkeley DB that came with it. . I had just finished configuring OpenLdap and samba when i realized the nss-ldap libraries were not doing what it's supposed to do, like checking my LDAP for passwd's, logins, and ssh etc. 'getent passwd' only returned entries from '/etc/passwd'. So I had to install PADL's

> >Excellent investigation and >details.? Thank you for this help.? Given >the details of your situation, I'm >reasonably certain it's a SYSLINUX >bug >but there is still a small chance of it being some sort >of negative interaction. > I do not think there's a negative interaction, while the VMware EFI environment correctly retrieves the NBP

Hi all, this is my first post on this list, hope someone can help me. I have to run a dhcp server on CentOS release 5.5 (Final). # yum list| grep -i dhcp dhcp.x86_64 12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed dhcp-devel.x86_64 12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed dhcpv6-client.x86_64 1.0.10-18.el5 installed after starting the dhcpd daemon, the windows Clients on the subnet (192.168.100.0/24) tells me, that there is no

I try to setup networking with a fresh CENTOS4.4 installation. Upto now I have 20 installations, most of them FC3/FC4 and RHEL3. I noticed that the default gateway is not setup properly when using Centos. [root at raaf ~]# route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.101.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0

Please check the dnsmasq hostsfile, should have all the records there: # cat /var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/osc_mgmt.hostsfile 52:54:00:2c:85:92,192.168.80.1,openstack-controller-00 52:54:00:e2:4b:25,192.168.80.2,openstack-database-00 52:54:00:50:91:04,192.168.80.3,openstack-keystone-00 52:54:00:fe:5b:36,192.168.80.7,openstack-rabbitmq-00 52:54:00:95:ca:bd,192.168.80.5,openstack-glance-00 -------

Given the following network configuration: =========== <network> <name>osc_mgmt</name> <uuid>d93fe709-14ae-4a0e-8989-aeaa8c76c513</uuid> <forward mode='route'/> <bridge name='osc_mgmt' stp='on' delay='0'/> <mac address='52:54:00:3f:fe:10'/> <ip address='192.168.80.254'

Hello, Will "R" work on this 64 bit machine?, Here are the specs. of our linux box: *Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS (v.3 Standard for AMD64 and Intel EM64T) *OS: redhat-release Release: 3WS CPU Arch: ia32e-redhat-linux (4) GenuineIntel Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.40GHz 3399 MHZ Arch: EM64T Cache: 1024 KB Vendor: GenuineIntel Memory: 2000 MB Stepping: 1 Family: 15 Swap: 4000

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >Excellent investigation and > >details. Thank you for this help. Given > >the details of your situation, I'm > >reasonably certain it's a SYSLINUX > >bug > >but there is still a small chance of it being some sort > >of negative interaction.