Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "Arp problem with network bridging and VLANs"
2010 Jun 15
0
Multi-NIC Debian Xen Box
Hello,
I''ve recently changed my xen network setup and now, almost expectedly, my
configuration has broken access to the Domus from the network, and now I
need a little help.
Previously, I had four interfaces, only one of which was configured to be
used by both dom0 and domu. I have since created a bond between eth2 and
eth3, expecting that eth0 would be automatically assigned for use
2006 Jan 05
1
vif''s disappear after dom1 reboot
Today I found I can not ping some of my domU''s. I logged in to dom0,
did a "xm list", all domU are there. Then I did a "ifconfig" and
surprised to find some of vif''s disappeared!
Like for example. "xm list" show dom13 is alive, but "brctl show"
shows no vif13.0.
If I "xm console 13", there''s some message:
WARNING:
2011 Jun 17
1
Failed to setup NAT network
I''m using Xen 4.1 and here''s what I did:
1.comment network-script and vif-script about bridge in
/etc/xen/xend-config.sxp, uncomment the lines about nat
2.set vm config, add something like vif = [ ''mac=00:16:3e:00:00:11,
ip=10.0.0.1'' ]
3.set /etc/network/interfaces in domU, add lines as follows:
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 10.0.0.1
gateway
2011 Jun 17
0
Failed to setup NAT
I''m using Xen 4.1 and here''s what I did:
1.comment network-script and vif-script about bridge in
/etc/xen/xend-config.sxp, uncomment the lines about nat
2.set vm config, add something like vif = [ ''mac=00:16:3e:00:00:11,
ip=10.0.0.1'' ]
3.set /etc/network/interfaces in domU, add lines as follows:
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 10.0.0.1
gateway
2012 Oct 05
0
is_physical bug in xapi
hi all,
i just found a bug from xapi code network_utils.ml:
let is_physical name =
try
let link = Unix.readlink (getpath name "device") in
(* filter out device symlinks which look like
/../../../devices/xen-backend/vif- *)
not(List.mem "xen-backend" (String.split ''/'' link))
with _ -> false
i use xcp + ubuntu 12.04, in my /sys/class/net/ dir it
2013 Mar 07
0
Bug#702428: log output
errors from /var/log/xcp-xapi.log:
652Z|debug||1227 UNIX /var/lib/xcp/xapi|VM.start R:0b98978366e4|xapi]
creating device emulator
652Z|debug||1227 UNIX /var/lib/xcp/xapi|VM.start R:0b98978366e4|xenops]
Device.Dm.start domid=10
661Z|debug||1227 UNIX /var/lib/xcp/xapi|VM.start R:0b98978366e4|xenops]
qemu-dm: should be running in the background (stdout redirected to syslog)
661Z|debug||1227 UNIX
2012 Oct 05
0
Bug#678723: i got same and found the reson
i just found a bug from xapi code network_utils.ml:
let is_physical name =
try
let link = Unix.readlink (getpath name "device") in
(* filter out device symlinks which look like
/../../../devices/xen-backend/vif- *)
not(List.mem "xen-backend" (String.split '/' link))
with _ -> false
i use xcp + ubuntu 12.04, in my /sys/class/net/ dir it looks like:
2013 Mar 05
1
Bug#702337: xen-xapi / Open vSwitch not really working
Package: xcp-xapi
Version: 1.3.2-14
Severity: important
I chose the Open vSwitch (ovs) networking mode when I installed XCP
# cat /etc/xcp/network.conf
openvswitch
Whenever I boot a VM, I notice that the vif interface is created (e.g.
vif1.0) on dom0, and the vif is added to the ovs bridge (I can see it in
the output of ovs-vsctl show)
However, there is no connectivity, I can't ping the
2004 May 31
1
bonding problem with arp-monitoring
Hello
I have two linux machines connected via 2 dsl lines (bonded)
192.168.0.1-eth0-dsl---2Mbit---dsl-eth0-192.168.0.2
^-eth1-dsl---2Mbit---dsl-eth1-^
so the final figure is something like this:
192.168.0.1-bond0---4Mbit---bond0-192.168.0.2
I can only use arp monitoring for fail checking - if one dsl line fails -
automatically use only the other one. I set up everything correctly (i
2007 Apr 10
0
[Fwd: Xen, NIC bonding, ARP problem]
I don''t know if there was a problem in the archive or not, I just wanted
to link to this post of mine, but I could not find it in the archive. So
here''s a re-post.
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: [Xen-users] Xen, NIC bonding, ARP problem
Datum: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:05:45 +0200
Von: Dominik Klein <dk@in-telegence.net>
An: xen-users@lists.xensource.com
Hi
2013 Mar 17
2
Bug#702428: HVM networking tap/vif bug (Debian bug 702428)
Hi,
I've been testing the Debian packages ahead of the Debian 7 release
(which is very imminent)
I believe this is a serious bug[1] in the package, as it appears that
HVM networking is broken, or at the very least, requires some
undocumented configuration step
Specifically:
- I can start the HVM domU without any vif
- if I attach a vif, the domU will not start
Looking at
2013 Mar 15
1
Bug#702428: raising to serious
My impression of this bug is that HVM networking is not possible with
XCP, or at least it is not possible without some undocumented
configuration setting or missing dependency package
If there is a workaround from upstream, I would propose lowering the
severity to important again. I am happy to test any proposed work
around and provide quick feedback.
The log output in my previous post suggests
2014 Oct 29
2
Bug#767261: xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64: host lockup when DomU network iface is down
Package: xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64
Version: 4.4.1-3
Severity: important
Hi,
I have some domUs with two network interfaces, eth0 and eth1. eth0 is
not configured in /etc/network/interfaces and so is not brought up at
boot time.
eth0 is on the host's external network bridge and eth1 is on the host's
local network bridge.
On dom0 I get messages like 'vif vif-10-0 vif10.0: draining TX
2010 Mar 17
0
Spooky networking issue: ping OK on container, stops on VM, restarts with arp -d
I am managing two Xen containers which are exhibiting a spooky behavior.
There are intermittent network failures
that affect only the VM''s, and not dom0. This exhibits itself as problems
with nfs locks, snmp, and even icmp ping.
The arp tables look normal on both the dom0 and the guest. However, it is
definitely arp related. Causing arp
traffic of any sort results the problem curing
2006 Mar 22
0
two bridges share the same bridge ID.
Hello all,
I would like to use two network interfaces.
It is working but I notice that both bridges hace the same id.
#brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
xenbr0 8000.feffffffffff no peth0
vif0.0
vif10.0
xenbr1
2011 Oct 04
3
Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. ip addr add 10.0.0.329 dev vif28.0 failed
I''ve looked everywhere for the error message I''ve posted in the title,
doesn''t seem like anyone else has it (lots of missing hotplugs scripts).
We''re using network-nat. ifconfig -a outputs this:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:19:99:a8:f4:5c
inet addr:X.X.X.X Bcast:X.X.X.X Mask:255.255.255.255
inet6 addr: X::X:X:X:X/64 Scope:Link
2009 Feb 04
2
More complex Xen Networking, with VLANs and maybe with VDE 2... but how?!
--- In english ---
Hello!
I am to implement a new architecture of the network in my company but I do
not know right where to start ... need help!
Currently 90% of my servers are virtual machines under Xen. I have many
valid IP networks and all Hypervisors are configured in bridge mode, to
simplify. We have 3 VMWare ESX Hypervisor also in bridge mode.
Some networks are exclusive to certain
2015 Jun 11
0
Bridges, VLANs, Bonding on CentOS 7
hi
2015-06-11 11:10 GMT+02:00 Timo Sch?ler <timo at riscworks.net>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi,
>
> some months ago I ran into a hassle with following, quite simple
> config that works on CentOS 6 and CentOS 5 extremeley well, for years.
> However, I have problems getting it running on CentOS 7.
>
>
2015 Jun 11
2
Bridges, VLANs, Bonding on CentOS 7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
some months ago I ran into a hassle with following, quite simple
config that works on CentOS 6 and CentOS 5 extremeley well, for years.
However, I have problems getting it running on CentOS 7.
,-- bond0.100 -- brbond0.100 -> (VMs)
eth0 (eno1 on C7) --. |
|--- bond0 ----|--
2009 Jul 22
5
network problems
So, I have been running into network problems for a while on 4 boxes
that I installed xen on so that some engineers have places to test code.
This particular problem is happening on all 4 of these boxes. (although,
it isn''t happening on an older box running xen from debian etch).
What appears to be the problem is that traffic is getting dropped
between the vif#.0 interface in dom0