Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "XEN server stalling .. problem spotted - solution required"
2016 Mar 23
0
Re: /proc/meminfo
On 03/23/2016 12:10 PM, Peter Steele wrote:
> Has anyone seen this issue? We're running containers under CentOS 7.2 and some
> of these containers are reporting incorrect memory allocation in
> /proc/meminfo. The output below comes from a system with 32G of memory and
> 84GB of swap. The values reported are completely wrong.
>
There was a meminfo bug here:
2014 Jan 09
1
Bug#734761: xen-system-amd64: "XEN kernel detects 3GB RAM instead of 4GB"
Package: xen-system-amd64
Version: 4.1.4-3+deb7u1
Severity: normal
The xen kernel detects 3GB of memory instead of the full 4GB. When using the "normal" kernel 4GB is detected.
On boot the 4GB is detected:
root at ams-tc1-xen27:~# dmesg |grep Mem
[ 0.000000] Memory: 3226132k/4980736k available (3426k kernel code, 788180k absent, 966424k reserved, 3312k data, 576k init)
But only
2016 Apr 26
0
Re: /proc/meminfo
Now reporduced with 100%
1) create contrainer with memory limit 1Gb
2) run inside simple memory test allocator:
#include <malloc.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <memory.h>
#define MB 1024 * 1024
int main() {
int total = 0;
while (1) {
void *p = malloc( 100*MB );
memset(p,0, 100*MB );
total = total + 100;
printf("Alloc %d Mb\n",total);
sleep(1);
2009 Jan 13
4
Out of memory
Sorry for previous post with incorrect referrals/thread.
For large mailboxes (64k + messages) using maildir I got random "out
of memory" errors.
[mail addresses hidden]
dovecot: Dec 05 18:25:27 Error: IMAP(****@****): block_alloc(): Out of memory
dovecot: Dec 05 18:25:27 Error: child 14142 (imap) returned error 83 (Out of memory)
dovecot: Dec 05 18:27:29 Error: IMAP(****@****):
2011 Jun 09
0
Xen very very slow on workstation HP Z4000
Hello,
To thank you for telling me if this message is not posted on the good list.
After installing Xen 4 on a workstation HP Z400, the hypervisor is
extremely slow, both on a Fedora machine on a Debian Squeeze, whether in
32-bit or 64-bit version.
Unable to install a DomU.
The problem seems to come from the hardware configuration of the HP Z400
- Xeon - W3550-4 processors - 16 GB of
2011 Mar 25
1
Samba Tuning to increase Throughput
Hi All,
I have gone through threads related to throughput issue in this list. Found few
similar issue, but could not get the solution.
So looking for some advice from group.
I am trying to use the samba to access a USB disk connected to our evaluation
board which has xtensa core running at 400 MHz.
Samba 3.5.x is running on the board. We are getting below throughput as tested
with the
2008 Oct 14
1
assert problem
rsync -rltpcvxH --progress --delete /mnt/sdf1/dvd .
....
lots of stuff works, but then....
....
dvd/setdir/www/web_admin-1.0-noarch-001.tgz
1306806 100% 3.34MB/s 0:00:00 (xfer#927, to-check=1004/2734)
dvd/setdir/xlibs/
deleting dvd/setdir/xlibs/gstreamer-0.10.21-i586-001.tgz
deleting dvd/setdir/xlibs/gst_plugins_base-0.10.21-i586-001.tgz
2010 May 30
4
OCFS2 performance - disk random access time problem
Hello.
I plan to use OCFS2 + DRBD for email server.
Problem:
I use "seeker" for testing
http://www.linuxinsight.com/how_fast_is_your_disk.html
And get this:
Results: 65 seeks/second, 15.23 ms random access time
Then I do rm of many files - it fals to 10 seeks/second and performance
is terrible.
What can I do to increase it? What`s wrong?
Below is many info.
What we have:
Debian
2012 Jul 26
2
kernel parameters for improving gluster writes on millions of small writes (long)
This is a continuation of my previous posts about improving write perf
when trapping millions of small writes to a gluster filesystem.
I was able to improve write perf by ~30x by running STDOUT thru gzip
to consolidate and reduce the output stream.
Today, another similar problem, having to do with yet another
bioinformatics program (which these days typically handle the 'short
reads' that
2012 Nov 03
0
mtrr_gran_size and mtrr_chunk_size
Good Day All,
Today I looked at the dmesg log and I notice that the following messages
regarding mtrr_gran_size/mtrr_chunk_size.
I am currently running CentOS 6.3 and I installed CentOS 6.2 and 6.1 and I
was seeing the same errors. When I installed CentOS 5.8 on the same laptop
I do not see these errors.
$ lsb_release -a
LSB Version:
2016 Mar 23
7
/proc/meminfo
Has anyone seen this issue? We're running containers under CentOS 7.2
and some of these containers are reporting incorrect memory allocation
in /proc/meminfo. The output below comes from a system with 32G of
memory and 84GB of swap. The values reported are completely wrong.
# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 9007199254740991 kB
MemFree: 9007199224543267 kB
MemAvailable: 12985680
2015 Feb 04
2
Re: HugePages - can't start guest that requires them
As I mentioned, I got the instances to launch... but they're only
taking HugePages from "Node 0", when I believe my setup should pull
from both nodes.
[atlas] http://sprunge.us/FSEf
[prometheus] http://sprunge.us/PJcR
2015-02-03 16:51:48
root@eanna i ~ # virsh start atlas
Domain atlas started
2015-02-03 16:51:58
root@eanna i ~ # virsh start prometheus
Domain prometheus started
2008 Jul 13
2
2.6.18-92.1.6.el5xen -- 8GB missing?
Hello,
Last night I upgraded a server to CentOS 5.2. The server has 16GB of
RAM. Now that it's running 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5xen only 8GB is reported to
exist.
# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 8818688 kB
MemFree: 3730124 kB
Buffers: 202004 kB
Cached: 4086788 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB
Active: 1551480 kB
Inactive: 2958196 kB
HighTotal: 0 kB
HighFree:
2007 May 30
0
host halts upon shutdown of 126000mb domains
The host server halts upon shutdown of 126000mb domU (64-bit SLES10).
It booted fine and was able to run kernbench. However, during shutdown
the host crashes. Host is Unisys ES7000 host with 32 processors and
128gb memory using x86_64 SLES10 with xen-unstable c/s 15080.
Reducing the memory allocation for the domU to 124000mb works fine. My
guess is that specifying 126000 does not leave
2010 Mar 04
6
XCP 64 bits ?
Hello,
I am just installing XCP 0.1.1 on a server with 24GB RAM
Normally XCP is a 64 bits version but
* *uname -a*
Linux node012 2.6.27.42-0.1.1.xs0.1.1.737.1065xen #1 SMP Fri
Jan 15 16:20:16 EST 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
(not a x86_64 version !!!!)
* *cat /proc/meminfo*
MemTotal: 746496 kB
MemFree: 384332 kB
Buffers:
2011 Sep 01
0
No buffer space available - loses network connectivity
Hi,
I have a centos 5.6 xen vps which loses network connectivity once in a
while with following error.
=========================================
-bash-3.2# ping 8.8.8.8
PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data.
ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available
ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available
ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available
ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available
2009 Jul 29
2
out of memory
I am getting this message quite often lately.
Centos 5.3, AMD dual core 5050e system x64
1 GIG ram, 4 GIG swap
I dont have that much running that the kernel should be cutting out my processes.
Any thoughts?
Jerry
------------
emTotal: 766264 kB
MemFree: 583984 kB
Buffers: 9572 kB
Cached: 31004 kB
SwapCached: 36280 kB
Active: 20240 kB
Inactive:
2010 Oct 19
5
max utilization
hi,
--> i have 8cores cpu. but my xenserver is using only one cpu, how to make
use of all cpu cores
--> machine is having 16G ram but domain0 is having very less memory. is
there any way to increase memory for domain0
[root@xenserver-DZONGRI ~]# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 574464 kB
MemFree: 111776 kB
Buffers: 9500 kB
Cached: 117320 kB
SwapCached: 100
2011 Sep 01
1
No buffer space available - loses network connectivity
Hi,
I have a centos 5.6 xen vps which loses network connectivity once in a
while with following error.
=========================================
-bash-3.2# ping 8.8.8.8
PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data.
ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available
ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available
ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available
ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available
2010 Mar 02
3
Very unresponsive, sometimes stalling domU (5.4, x86_64)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
please forgive cross posting, but I cannot specify the problem enough to
say whether list it fits perfectly, so I'll ask on both.
I have some machines based with following specs (see at the end of the
email).
They run CentOS 5.4 x86_64 with the latest patches applied, Xen-enabled
and should host one or more domUs. I put the domUs'