similar to: DomU (Centos 5) with dedicated e1000 (intel) device dropping packets

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "DomU (Centos 5) with dedicated e1000 (intel) device dropping packets"

2011 May 02
32
[PATCH] blkback: Fix block I/O latency issue
In blkback driver, after I/O requests are submitted to Dom-0 block I/O subsystem, blkback goes to ''sleep'' effectively without letting blkfront know about it (req_event isn''t set appropriately). Hence blkfront doesn''t notify blkback when it submits a new I/O thus delaying the ''dispatch'' of the new I/O to Dom-0 block I/O subsystem. The new I/O is
2011 Sep 01
9
[PATCH V4 0/3] xen-blkfront/blkback discard support
Dear list, This is the V4 of the trim support for xen-blkfront/blkback, Now we move BLKIF_OP_TRIM to BLKIF_OP_DISCARD, and dropped all "trim" stuffs in the patches, and use "discard" instead. Also we updated the helpers of blkif_x86_{32|64}_request or we will meet problems using a non-native protocol. And this patch has been tested with both SSD and raw file, with SSD we will
2007 Nov 29
4
Pci export configuration
Hi all, This has, i''m sure, been told a lot of time but i haven''t found any things to solve my problems. Here is it: I wan''t to export a usb port on DomU (CentOS 5) from my Dom0 (Debian Etch). I have only succeded with the pci export but with the next command: "xm create machine pci=00:1d.0" With having many differents syntaxes in the machine
2007 Dec 18
7
Xen dom0 memory
I just discovered that my xen hypervisor only believes that it has 3199 MB of memory, when there are 4GB inside the computer. I don''t know how long this has been this way, but I do not know how to try and force the hypervisor to realize how much memory it has. Any ideas how I can accomplish this? I am running CentOS 5 (RHEL 5), kernel 2.6.18-53.1.4.el5xen, x86_64, xen 3.0.3.
2007 Aug 30
3
machine with 2 ethernet cards e1000 and forcedeth
I am using centos 5 x86_64 AMD64 X2 4200+. I am current on yum update. My machine has two ethernet cards. e1000 (eth0) and forcedeth (eth1) [root at fsdsigns2 ~]# more /etc/modprobe.conf alias eth0 e1000 alias eth1 forcedeth sometimes on boot the forcedeth driver thinks it is eth0: [root at fsdsigns2 ~]# dmesg | grep eth forcedeth.c: Reverse Engineered nForce ethernet driver. Version 0.60.
2011 Jun 21
13
VM disk I/O limit patch
Hi all, I add a blkback QoS patch. You can config(dynamic/static) different I/O speed for different VM disk by this patch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- diff -urNp blkback/blkback.c blkback-qos/blkback.c --- blkback/blkback.c 2011-06-22 07:54:19.000000000 +0800 +++ blkback-qos/blkback.c 2011-06-22 07:53:18.000000000 +0800 @@ -44,6 +44,11 @@
2011 Jun 21
13
VM disk I/O limit patch
Hi all, I add a blkback QoS patch. You can config(dynamic/static) different I/O speed for different VM disk by this patch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- diff -urNp blkback/blkback.c blkback-qos/blkback.c --- blkback/blkback.c 2011-06-22 07:54:19.000000000 +0800 +++ blkback-qos/blkback.c 2011-06-22 07:53:18.000000000 +0800 @@ -44,6 +44,11 @@
2013 Jul 15
6
[PATCH 0 of 6 RESEND v2] blktap3/sring: shared ring between tapdisk and the front-end
This patch series introduces the shared ring used by the front-end to pass request descriptors to tapdisk, as well as responses from tapdisk to the front-end. Requests from this ring end up in tapdisk''s standard request queue. When the tapback daemon detects that the front-end tries to connect to the back-end, it spawns a tapdisk and tells it to connect to the shared ring. The shared
2005 Jun 07
3
Error while creating domains
I am trying to start a large number of SMP domains (> 50). However, I am unable to create more than 7 domains. When I try creating the 8th domain, I get this error: Using config file "myconf7". VIRTUAL MEMORY ARRANGEMENT: Loaded kernel: 0xc0100000->0xc0344c24 Init. ramdisk: 0xc0345000->0xc0345000 Phys-Mach map: 0xc0345000->0xc0347800 Page tables:
2006 Dec 05
5
ioctl 0000126c not supported by XL blkif
I am using the srpm from http://xenbits.xensource.com/kernels/rhel3x/kernel-2.4.21-47.0.1.EL.xs0.3.5. 15.src.rpm (I get the same issue using the binary RPM) the dom0 is running 3.0.3_0 Upon booting the DomU, (the DomU has been passed phy:/dev/sda6, which has been partitioned using qemu) I get the following ioctl errors. ioctl 0000126c not supported by XL blkif ioctl 0000126c not supported
2008 Mar 10
12
[RFC][PATCH] Use ioemu block drivers through blktap
When I submitted the qcow2 patch for blktap, suggestions came up that the qemu block drivers should be used also for blktap to eliminate the current code duplication in ioemu and blktap. The attached patch adds support for a tap:ioemu pseudo driver. Devices using this driver won''t use tapdisk (containing the code duplication) any more, but will connect to the qemu-dm of the domain. In
2012 Sep 19
27
[PATCH] Persistent grant maps for xen blk drivers
This patch implements persistent grants for the xen-blk{front,back} mechanism. The effect of this change is to reduce the number of unmap operations performed, since they cause a (costly) TLB shootdown. This allows the I/O performance to scale better when a large number of VMs are performing I/O. Previously, the blkfront driver was supplied a bvec[] from the request queue. This was granted to
2010 Sep 15
15
xenpaging fixes for kernel and hypervisor
Patrick, there following patches fix xenpaging for me. Granttable handling is incomplete. If a page is gone, a GNTST_eagain should be returned to the caller to inidcate the hypercall has to be retried after a while, until the page is available again. Please review. Olaf _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
2008 Nov 15
2
blkif definition
hello- i seem to gone blind, i am unable to find definitions for blkif_sring_t and blkif_x86_64_sring_t. in what file can i find them? thanks, Sam _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2012 Mar 05
11
[PATCH 0001/001] xen: multi page ring support for block devices
From: Santosh Jodh <santosh.jodh at citrix.com> Add support for multi page ring for block devices. The number of pages is configurable for blkback via module parameter. blkback reports max-ring-page-order to blkfront via xenstore. blkfront reports its supported ring-page-order to blkback via xenstore. blkfront reports multi page ring references via ring-refNN in xenstore. The change allows
2012 Mar 05
11
[PATCH 0001/001] xen: multi page ring support for block devices
From: Santosh Jodh <santosh.jodh at citrix.com> Add support for multi page ring for block devices. The number of pages is configurable for blkback via module parameter. blkback reports max-ring-page-order to blkfront via xenstore. blkfront reports its supported ring-page-order to blkback via xenstore. blkfront reports multi page ring references via ring-refNN in xenstore. The change allows
2012 Mar 05
11
[PATCH 0001/001] xen: multi page ring support for block devices
From: Santosh Jodh <santosh.jodh at citrix.com> Add support for multi page ring for block devices. The number of pages is configurable for blkback via module parameter. blkback reports max-ring-page-order to blkfront via xenstore. blkfront reports its supported ring-page-order to blkback via xenstore. blkfront reports multi page ring references via ring-refNN in xenstore. The change allows
2012 Jul 11
12
99% iowait on one core in 8 core processor
Hi All, We have a xen server and using 8 core processor. I can see that there is 99% iowait on only core 0. 02:28:49 AM CPU %user %nice %sys %iowait %irq %soft %steal %idle intr/s 02:28:54 AM all 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.65 0.00 0.02 2.24 85.08 1359.88 02:28:54 AM 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 96.21 0.00 0.20 3.19 0.40 847.11 02:28:54 AM
2011 Oct 08
9
xentop reporting zero written sectors
Just moving a chunk of files from one filesysstem on xvba to another on xvdb, and was monitoring with xentop as it was taking longer than expected. The VBD_RD and VBD_WR counters were both clocking-up as expected, as was the VBD_RSECT counter, but the VBD_WSECT counter was stuck on zero, I toggled on the individual VBD device counters and these showed the same (with the RD and WR counters
2011 Oct 08
9
xentop reporting zero written sectors
Just moving a chunk of files from one filesysstem on xvba to another on xvdb, and was monitoring with xentop as it was taking longer than expected. The VBD_RD and VBD_WR counters were both clocking-up as expected, as was the VBD_RSECT counter, but the VBD_WSECT counter was stuck on zero, I toggled on the individual VBD device counters and these showed the same (with the RD and WR counters