similar to: eth0 does not exist when booting to xen kernel

When does vif0.0 get created? Is there some shell magic? I''m trying to figure out how to do a similar peth1/veth1 split for eth1. -- Nicholas Lee http://stateless.geek.nz gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF 5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi, This is my setting: I have a Logical Volume /dev/VG/suse with Suse installed. I have added it to the grub and I can boot it and works perfectly fine. Now I am running /dev/VG/root which is running Xen0. I have created a Xen config file to boot a VM with disk: /dev/VG/suse. In other words I want to boot /dev/VG/suse as a virtual machine. Below is what I am getting at boot time :

Hi, I''ve setup a box with xen. For the root machine, it''s ok, it see the network card: alian@yoda:~> /sbin/lspci ... 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8053 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 19) alian@yoda:~> lsmod .... sk98lin 208748 1 alian@yoda:~> /sbin/ifconfig eth0 Lien encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:F2:39:D4:DF

Hello list! I have a Asterisk 1.2.10 running using the package from Backports.org for Debian Sarge. I have setup chan_capi (0.6.5 from Backports) and it seems that I am only able to use on B-Channel. When trying to place the second call I get: CAPI INFO 0x34a2: No circuit / channel available capi info shows: Contr1: 2 B channels total, 1 B channels free And capi.conf is: [ISDN1]

xenconsole fix. reference of tty->count in xencons_close() is racy. It must be protected by tty_sem semaphore like con_close() in drivers/char/vt.c -- yamahata _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi list. I started with Xen yesterday, but I am facing a bit of a problem. My system had always configure eth0 with 10.0.0.4/8 I am using Xen unstable source (on Debian sid) Now I installed Xen, rebooted the machine, and first the usual network is coming up and then the xend will be started. I''ll end up with this, but I am wondering if this should be the way of things to be

Hi list, Update: originally i wanted to post a question, but in writing i thought of things that finally led me to the solution. This i wanted to share with the community in case it can help. Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I had no luck searching for it. I have a working Samba 2.2.5 installation on SuSE8.1. I have two users on a windows client called Torge (that's me) and Ga&ediaresis;lle

I can''t find network device in domU. Debian domU shows Configuring network interfaces...SIOCSIFADDR: No such device eth0: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device and Fedora domU shows: eth0: unknown interface: No such device Dom0 is using Fedora with: kernel-xen-guest.i686 2.6.15-1.29_FC5 installed kernel-xen-hypervisor.i686

Hi. I am running Xen 3.0.3-1 on Debian Etch. Does anyone have a sample config file for creating a windows DomU? I have the ISO file from my windows CD. I''m not using LVM Thanks in Advance _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

I have a domU configured with two virtual ethernet interfaces - one on a private bridge and one to the outside world. If I cat /proc/net/dev (or loop round the interfaces using SIOCGIFNAME) there are loads of them? Should they all be there ? I''m using the same kernel for dom0 & domU. Inter-| Receive | Transmit face |bytes

Hi, I am using Xen 4.1.1 with Linux 3.0.1 kernel. Previously (Xen 3.4.4 and linux kernel 2.6.18) Xen by default created veth0 <--> vif0.0 pair in dom0. With Xen 4.1.1 these pairs are missing in dom0. Using command ''ip link add type veth'' I can create veth0 and veth1 but vif0.0 is still missing in dom0. (When new domU created I can see vif1.x created) Could you please help

Hi, I am using Xen 4.1.1 with Linux 3.0.1 kernel. Previously (Xen 3.4.4 and linux kernel 2.6.18) Xen by default created veth0 <--> vif0.0 pair in dom0. With Xen 4.1.1 these pairs are missing in dom0. Using command ''ip link add type veth'' I can create veth0 and veth1 but vif0.0 is still missing in dom0. (When new domU created I can see vif1.x created) Could you please help

Hi All I am a newbie to the xen community and I am facing some crashes due to my code changes. A quick question: When i start a new domain with id being set to say "VM100" (the id that is shown in the xm list ouput), whats the id that will be stored in the domain structure? i.e struct domain *d ; d->id ?? Any help will be appreciated. Thanks Jaikumar

During my attempts to get the latest bridge networking model working on my system, I often invoked ''network-bridge stop'' with total failure. Attached is an updated version that works. -Andrew signed-off-by: Andrew Theurer <habanero@us.ibm.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

> Hi. what creates veth0 and vifu.0, when? what''s the > underlying architecture behind them? Just trying to > understand the internals. netback/loopback.c creates them. It''s effectively a point to point link, allowing domain 0 to connect on to the bridge in the same manner that other domains do. (before, packets to domain 0 were short-cutted and came off the

Hello again, folks! I''m getting one strange problem with FC5 running on XEN 3.0.3 x64... The MRTG point to my machine with XEN running one absurd volume of output data sent (normal is around 6 MB/s) and when XEN is working we get 80 MB/s until my DRAC is alive... after this, the machine crash, DRAC stop do reply, swith stop do work together... Anyone knows whats happening now? ;)

Ben Greear wrote: > Well, it seems we could and should fix veth to work, but it will have > to do equivalent work of copying an skb most likely, so either way > you'll probably get a big performance hit. Using the same pktgen script (i.e with clone=0) I see that a veth-->bridge-->veth configuration gives about 400K PPS forwarding performance where

Greetings! I finally got the install done for a couple of gust OSs (Win 2003 server & Suse Enterprise 10) Bothe gusts are up and running, but - no networking. My setup: Hardware - AMD Athlon 4200+, ABIT Motherboard, 4 GB of DDR2 RAM, 2 onboard GB NICs Host OS- Suse Linux Enterprise server 10 Xen - 3.0.2_09749-0.4 Config file for Win 2003 server guest: # -*- mode: python; -*-

Ben Greear wrote: > Well, it seems we could and should fix veth to work, but it will have > to do equivalent work of copying an skb most likely, so either way > you'll probably get a big performance hit. Using the same pktgen script (i.e with clone=0) I see that a veth-->bridge-->veth configuration gives about 400K PPS forwarding performance where

Hi, I try to get networking running with xen 3.2, but it seems I fail miserably. I am on sles10sp1, with xen 3.2.0, and kernel rpm''s installed from SP2. I configured in /etc/sysconfig/network the NETWORK_LIST: NETWORK_LIST="bridge,0,default,00:DE:AD:BE:EF,192.168.8.13/24,dhcp-off" but an ifconfig xenbr0 still shows the mac address of peth0 fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff. Initially, I