similar to: mac address for 2nd nic

I've got a Xen domU running Centos 5.2 (dom0 is also Centos 5.2) with two NICs configured. Both NICs show up in the Xen hardware details display. Looking at dmesg output from rebooting the domU, I see both eth0 and eth1 appearing there. But network configuration only knows about eth0, the one that was installed originally (eth1 was added later). There's options to create another NIC in

Hello, I'm having a problem getting two (working) NICs enslaved to a bridge to both work in the bridge. The setup is just for testing and looks like this: (NETWORK)-------|bridge|---------|test PC| I'm building a bridge from an old Dell Optiplex GX1 desktop. Using kernel-2.6.9-gentoo-r4, with bridging and ebtables compiled into the kernel; the two PCI NICs are Intel, and the e100

I have a DomU as a firewall (using the Dom0 kernel). I hid the three nics from Dom0 and assigned them to the firewall VM. The firewall VM sees the three nics no problem. Eth0 comes up and grabs an IP automatically from my DHCP server, however eth1 and eth2 are configured with static IPs but they do not come up with an IP: Here is my ''ifconfig'': [root@fw01 ~]# ifconfig eth0

Hi All, I have 2 NICS in this system. CentOS 6.4 eth0 is the virtual IP from PFSense mapping connected to the router, works fine. eth1 is a second NIC that I have assigned a private IP to and connected it to a switch on the private network. I have many other private devices, so I know this setup works. When I connect the cable to the switch and bring up eth1 the system basically stops taking

Hello all. I''ve upgraded my drives, and in doing so loaded FC8. Latest kernel-xen.x86_64 (2.6.21.7-5) and xen.x86_64 (3.1.2-5) available, using 2 Intel NICs with e1000 driver. All worked fine on FC5 with custom domU FC5 with pcifront and NIC drivers in kernel. Now, I''m unable to get the NICs to function inside my domU. The are visible in lspci, and ipconfig. DomU dmesg

Hello Am Friday 11 December 2015, 10:13:00 schrieb Gordon Messmer: > On 12/11/2015 06:04 AM, G?nther J. Niederwimmer wrote: > > I have 4 NIC on all my KVM Servers but the most time on a start (restart) > > I > > lost one NIC? It is not always the same, but this two are virtio NICs. > > > > with ifup eth0(1) the system say,I have no configured eth0 or eth1 file ?

Hello all, I''m using Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (with RH Virtualization) and a Dell Poweredge 2950 with 10 NICs. My virtual operating systems are all RHEL4, and I''ve installed 4 instances. I''m trying to set up the virtual operating systems so that the physical NICs are allocated to certain operating systems. Using the following tutorial:

to all who read this message, I can't assign the second MAC to the second NIC for a VM. If only use 1 NIC, assigning MAC works. But not for 2 NICs or more. Do anyone has any ideas? I have installed KVM on Ubuntu 11.10 64bit on my laptop. Also created the bridge on the host, and also taps. I created a RHEL 6.1 64bit VM on this environment and run: sudo kvm -m 512 -drive

I have two servers with identical hardware ... TYAN i3210w system boards with dual intel gigabit interfaces, and a PCI intel gigabit nic. I'm running Centos 5.4, x86_64, 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 Every other time I reboot, the nics initialize in a different order. anaconda had setup /etc/modprobe.conf with alias lines for the cards: alias eth0 e1000 alias eth1 e1000e alias eth2 e1000e However,

Hi xen-devel, I have been trying to pcihide a NIC from dom0 and directly claim it on domU. The dom0 had come up with the bnx2 driver claiming the nic card, but after that i did an unbind and bound the pciback driver with this interface. lspci on domU shows the only pci device and it is claimed by the bnx2 driver.However the link of the interface as shown by ethtool continues to be down. When i

Hi all, I have xen2.0.7 running in a fedora core 3 ! I have dom0 and domU running fine and communicating between each other as well between other machines on diferent networks. Still i want to improve my network setup and i start reading manuals and malling lists about bridging and vlans configuration! I have two nics each one associated to eth0 and eth1. Eth0 -> Vlan A Eth1 -> Vlan

Hi, Sometimes, I found one of my Mellanox NIC renamed to rename6, instead of eth1. The right names of NICs in my system should be: eth0 Mellanox NIC eth1 Mellanox NIC eth2 Intel NIC eth3 Intel NIC eth4 Intel NIC eth5 Intel NIC eth0 and eth1 will combined as bond1 with mode 4. However, the current names are: eth0 Mellanox

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=779 --- Comment #5 from calebc2099 at yahoo.com 2013-07-12 01:54:55 CEST --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Have you tried to replicate the problem with a defective NIC? Here is an > > example of how to replicate the problem: > > Well, that is difficult since I do not own defective nics. But again: if

Here''s one that makes me scratch my head. I have a layout like this: 172.16.0.0/16 1.2.3.48/28 172.16.n.n (fictional public IP range) internal hosts | <----+-----+----------+ +----------+------>to the Internet | | | | Internal | | | Host Firewall

I have a bridge br0, it enslaves two NICs: eth0 and eth1. By using "cat /proc/net/dev ", i can see the Rx/Tx packets and bytes through each interface. just like this: [* time tick 1 *] Inter-| Receive | Transmit face |bytes packets errs drop fifo frame compressed multicast|bytes packets errs drop fifo colls carrier compressed

On 12/11/2015 06:04 AM, G?nther J. Niederwimmer wrote: > I have 4 NIC on all my KVM Servers but the most time on a start (restart) I > lost one NIC? It is not always the same, but this two are virtio NICs. > > with ifup eth0(1) the system say,I have no configured eth0 or eth1 file ? You haven't given us much to go on. The output of these commands might be helpful: lspci

File Server OS: CentOS 5.3 (x86_64) Kernel: CentOS Plus kernel (need XFS fs drivers) The file server has a Chelsio T310 10GBASE-CX4 RNIC (rev 3) PCI Express x8 MSI-X (eth0), driver and firmware is stock from the CentOS Plus kernel. Using ethtool I have verified driver association with the 3 NICs on the system (eth1 and eth2 are not connected to any switch) Driver for eth0 driver: cxgb3

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=779 --- Comment #4 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-07-11 23:30:36 CEST --- (In reply to comment #3) > Have you tried to replicate the problem with a defective NIC? Here is an > example of how to replicate the problem: Well, that is difficult since I do not own defective nics. But again: if your NIC is defective,

Hello everyone! Well i want to know, if there is a way to specify a physical nic (like eth0 or eth1) to a domU and how can i do it. The server has two nics, what i want to do is assign physical nic (eth0) to the dom0 and assign physical nic (eht1) to the domU. I appreciate your help. Regards Ivan ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a

I have a Supermicro X8SSAX mother board with 2 onboard Intel 82574L Gigabit NICs. Stock Centos 5.5 install with the e1000e.ko driver updated to the latest from Intel website (1.2.10-NAPI) I am attempting to get a bonded interface working, but while mucking around I noticed the NICs are behaving oddly in the xen kernel, but work fine in the non-xen kernel. When I boot dom0 into