similar to: Problem creating windows 2003 server guest

Greetings! I finally got the install done for a couple of gust OSs (Win 2003 server & Suse Enterprise 10) Bothe gusts are up and running, but - no networking. My setup: Hardware - AMD Athlon 4200+, ABIT Motherboard, 4 GB of DDR2 RAM, 2 onboard GB NICs Host OS- Suse Linux Enterprise server 10 Xen - 3.0.2_09749-0.4 Config file for Win 2003 server guest: # -*- mode: python; -*-

Hello. I have encountered a problem with GPLPV drivers for windows. It is similar (if not the same) as http://old-list-archives.xen.org/archives/html/xen-users/2011-02/msg00709.html Host is running 14 virtual machines with Windows XP. When I''m trying to start 15-th windows VM it crashes with code 0x0000007b. Booting to safe mode or with /nogplpv works ok. 15-th VM works fine if

Please consider the following: Puma=c(702, 702, 701, 702, 701, 702, 701, 702 ,702 ,702 ,701 ,702, 702, 701 ,701, 702, 701 ,702, 702, 702,701, 702 ,702 ,702 ,701) PumaNums=c(100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 , 600 , 701 , 702 , 800 , 900 ,1000 ,1101, 1102, 1200 ,1301 ,1302 ,1303, 1304, 1305, 1306, 1307 ,1308 ,1309 ,1310 ,1311 ,1312 ,1313) PumaNames<-c("Northeast", "NorthCentral",

Hi Eugene, Sorry for the delayed reply. Custom relocations weren't something I had in mind when I designed Orc, so they raise some interesting design questions which I don't have good answers to yet. (E.g. The interface for the Orc layer concept assumes that there's a RuntimeDyld instance embedded at the bottom of the stack. That's why addModuleSet takes a MemoryManager and

Yes, I’m handling all internal and external relocations manually in NotifyLoadedFtor and I already verified that I get the behavior I need if I comment out the call to resolveRelocations. I would like to reuse ObjectLinkingLayer::addObjectSet (which eventually calls RuntimeDyld::loadObject), which has the right calls to the memory manager and also RuntimeDyld::registerEHFrames. I understand that

Hi Eugene, Skipping the call to resolveRelocations would disable many (if not all) internal relocations too. Is that the desired behavior? At that point there's not much left for RuntimeDyld (or the ObjectLinkingLayer) to do. Would something like a NoopLinkingLayer be a workable solution? Cheers, Lang. On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Eugene Rozenfeld < Eugene.Rozenfeld at

Hi Lang, Yes, I can return a non-zero marker value. Are you ok with this version? void RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveExternalSymbols() { while (!ExternalSymbolRelocations.empty()) { StringMap<RelocationList>::iterator i = ExternalSymbolRelocations.begin(); StringRef Name = i->first(); if (Name.size() == 0) { // This is an absolute symbol, use an address of zero.

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:34 AM, Peter Smith via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Thanks for the RFC. > > I'm in favour of the option of creating InputSections for some linker > generated content. I think it would add extra flexibility to the > linker. ARM's proprietary linker uses the equivalent of InputSections > with a pseudo linker defined

Hi Lang, It turns out I also need an ability to tell the object linking layer not to apply any relocations. I need to skip this step below. The only way I can see I can achieve that is by creating my own ObjectLinkingLayer that would duplicate almost all of orc::ObjectLinkingLayer. I’d like to avoid that. An alternative it to pass a flag to orc::ObjectLinkingLayer constructor and

I see. I assumed it runs binutils directly. Eugene On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 7, 2010, at 1:55 PM, Eugene Toder wrote: > >>> The clang driver generally uses an installed gcc to do the assemble >>> and link steps at the moment. >> >> gcc? I thought it uses binutils. > > > The gcc

Hi Lang, Can you please let me know you think it would be right to modify RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveExternalSymbols to allow resolvers to return 0 addresses? Something like this would be ideal for me: void RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveExternalSymbols() { while (!ExternalSymbolRelocations.empty()) { StringMap<RelocationList>::iterator i = ExternalSymbolRelocations.begin(); StringRef

Eugene, how about below? $ clang clangtest.cpp `llvm-config --ldflags --libs core` (I guess linking order would be) 2012/7/18 Eugene <code_ep at yahoo.com>: > The output of `llvm-config --cppflags --ldflags --libs core support` and > `llvm-config --cppflags --ldflags --libs core` is the same. I've also tried specifying -lLLVMSupport manually. Same result. > > --Eugene >

I suspect the problem is that dovecot tries to report LDAP error over GSSAPI. So the best fix is to make sure your LDAP server does not return error. =) Aki On 15.8.2019 14.56, Eugene Bright wrote: > That's right. > GSS-API is not used anywhere else. > Do you like to inspect my full configuration? > I can dump connection session and send pcap file here. > > On August 15,

I have a .csv table named mailing.csv as below. It consist a receiver, subject and sender. Receiver subject sender 1 Adrian Cole RE: [WHIRR-117] Composable services Tom White 2 Adrian Cole RE: [WHIRR-117] Composable services Tom White 3 Adrian Cole RE: [WHIRR-117] Composable services Adrian Cole 4 Adrian Cole RE: [WHIRR-117]

> The clang driver generally uses an installed gcc to do the assemble > and link steps at the moment. gcc? I thought it uses binutils. Eugene

Hi, I have a table with data, as below: dput(table): structure(list(Adrian.Cole = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L), Alison.Wong = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L), Andrei.Savu = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L), Bruno.Dumon = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L), Edward.J..Yoon = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L), Eugene.Koontz = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L), Jakob.Homan = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L), Kelvin.Kakugawa = c(0L, 0L,

The output of `llvm-config --cppflags --ldflags --libs core support` and `llvm-config --cppflags --ldflags --libs core` is the same. I've also tried specifying -lLLVMSupport manually. Same result.  --Eugene ----- Original Message -----  Hi Eugene, >I do this, and I've tried a few variations of on it: >clang++ `llvm-config --cppflags --ldflags --libs core` -o clangtest

> On 15/08/2019 00:34 Eugene via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > The next combination of parameters makes 100% LDAP connections unsuccessful (the log snippet form the previous mail). > sasl_bind = yes > sasl_mech = gssapi > tls = yes > > Looks like this combination is utterly incorrect and should be prohibited (tls must not be used when mech is

Hi Eugene, It is strange, I also do a clean build with CMake+make with r301734 and it is ok. Could you provide more details? Thanks Hongbin On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Eugene Zelenko via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, Michael! > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Michael Kruse <llvmdev at meinersbur.de> > wrote: > > 2017-04-29 0:49

I use LDAP right now, but local cached sssd queries are much faster and reliable. On July 15, 2019 6:49:18 AM GMT+03:00, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > >On 15/07/2019 02:54 Eugene via dovecot < dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > >Hello! > > >Upgrading manual tells that authdb [NSS module was removed][1] some >time ago. >