similar to: No /dev/net/tun in dom0

Hello, I am a rather new user to OpenSolaris and I have been loving every minute of it. I have spent quite a lot of time looking around for bandwidth management features and Project Crossbow is just amazing. It is truly amazing compared to what Linux has to offer. I would like to use flowadm to do some bandwidth management on a tun interface. The problem is that it is not recognized by the dladm

hey friends, I am trying to configure OpenVPN on Centos4.0 for this I need tun/tap rpm package. Where can I find the package for the same ? Thanks & Regards Ankush Grover -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060728/ae8d2041/attachment-0001.html>

Hello, I have an OpenVPN running on a system with Samba 3.0.9. However, with this setting (tun2 is my VPN device): interfaces = tun2, lo bind interfaces only = Yes it doesn't bind to tun2, but to ppp0. What the heck? Tomek

Hi, I purchased a VPS with OpenVZ with infrastructure installed Centos 6.4 64bit. When I configure OpenVPN for remote access I can not because I do not get loaded into the interface modules tun / tap from console: #cat /dev/net/tun cat: /dev/net/tun: No such file or directory #lsmod | grep tun # # uname -r 2.6.32-042stab079.6 I have to ask for support to those who sold the VPS or can I fix

Greetings, me again. I''m starting to feel miff now. If I have a few vpn tunnels with different tun interfaces. And all this tunnel traffic is coming in on my eth0 interface, it also leave via eth0 again. I would like to share the available bandwidth evenly with tunnel clients. Would applying the bandwidth rule on eth0 with htb & sfq work for sharing the bandwidth or will

Hi folks, I have three network cards on my Slackware box and eth0 and eth1 are for two Internet connections. They have imq0 and imq1. All traffic shaping works fine. Internal eth2 does no traffic shaping. But recently I have put two OpenVPN tunnels (tun devices) and both work via eth0. So my question is - how to shape the traffic on these tun0 and tun1 devices? Thanks Remus

I had the chance to test out one of the new Sun X2200 M2 servers for a week or so, aiming to check out the status of HVM support on these machines. The machine was a dual-Opteron dual-core, with 8GB RAM and 1 300GB SATA disk. Normally I tend to use Debian on my servers, but due to lack of needed hardware support on Debian x86_64 images, and because I had very few time to run the tests, I used an

I have Xen 3.0.2 running on Debian Unstable with a straightforward setup, mainly based on this howto http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/396. When I have restarted dom0, I get this error, when I start a domU with xm create -c vm.cfg Error: Device 769 (vbd) could not be connected. Backend device not found. Google have pointed me to this solution:

You definetly need a TAP connection to make samba work over VPN. We use OpenVPN host2net-accounts created with IPCop here since quite a while and it works with samba without problems. However, the speed is of course not as fast as in local net, but this is rather related to the way the SMB-protocoll works. ;-) ________________________________________ Von: samba [samba-bounces at

Friends-- I'm stumped! Cannot get mount.cifs to work over a tun connection. How would you trouble-shoot this? 1. It cannot be openvpn causing the problem: I can ping across the connection both directions on all machines. 2. It cannot be samba causing the problem: I can mount.cifs the smb shares on the lan (using the identical credentials file) without any issue. 3. Have iptables

Hello I read a whole book on OpenVPN, but still can't figure how to configure the server + client so that the the client connects and sends SIP/RTP data through the tunnel. To get started, I'd rather use a shared key instead of X509 (certificates + keys). The server is running on a uClinux appliance, with /dev/net/tun, and OpenVPN is 2.0.9. The clients will be Windows hosts connecting

Hi, I had some performance problems with TINC running on Windows XP. I had a VPN tunnel running over a wireless network to a Linux VPN server. Web browsing through the tunnel was a pain. Big web pages with lots of pictures loaded very slow compared to a plain network connection. When the VPN client was running on a Linux computer, and a Windows computer was browsing the web through the VPN

Hello I''m hoping you guys can help me figure this out. When I use shorewall clear my windows openvpn client connects perfectly every time. But when I have the shorewall up 90% (not every time) it will connect for about a second and then the connection will reset and that will repeat over and over so i never don''t really get a steady connection at all. I can tell you that

I want to check some client OpenVPN TUN interfaces with MRTG running at my VPN server, so I have to specify their OID interface numbers in mrtg.cfg. The problem is, these numbers are dynamic, as they may change whenever OpenVPN restarts for any reason... so, how can I write stanzas such as Target[somehostvpninterface] : ifInOctets.X&ifOutOctets.X:public@ <SOMEHOST.IP> without wiring up

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Greetings, I want to setup bandwidth restrictions for a few clients that use openvpn to connect to my server. I''m using iptables to mark the packets in the mangle table (PRE/POSTROUTING) on eth0 before they get sent via the tunnel. Will the mark survive even if the packets then get routed via an openvpn tunnel (tunX) out the box or does openvpn change it removing the mark ? damnit,

Hi all, I''m trying to use OpenVPN as a VPN solution on a firewall running Shorewall. The IPSEC VPN I tried first has shown a little bit unstable under several conditions, especially with Windows clients. As OpenVPN is best run in ''bridged'' mode (see http://fedoranews.org/contributors/florin_andrei/openvpn/), I became interested in the bridge capabilities of