similar to: eth0 not found in Suse Enterprice Server 10

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "eth0 not found in Suse Enterprice Server 10"

2008 May 04
2
network-bridge called three times
Hello All, I'm trying to figure out why xen-utils-common 3.2 doesn't suport bridging on multiple interfaces. I've been digging around /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridges. And modified it so that during boot, when executed the script writes into /tmp/netbr file, but I commented out code that actually creates bridges. I discovered that this script is called three times during boot, I
2006 Jul 07
4
VM boots BUT keep throwing: "INIT: Id "X" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes"
Hi, This is my setting: I have a Logical Volume /dev/VG/suse with Suse installed. I have added it to the grub and I can boot it and works perfectly fine. Now I am running /dev/VG/root which is running Xen0. I have created a Xen config file to boot a VM with disk: /dev/VG/suse. In other words I want to boot /dev/VG/suse as a virtual machine. Below is what I am getting at boot time :
2006 Jan 10
0
Lots of IFs in /proc/net/dev
I have a domU configured with two virtual ethernet interfaces - one on a private bridge and one to the outside world. If I cat /proc/net/dev (or loop round the interfaces using SIOCGIFNAME) there are loads of them? Should they all be there ? I''m using the same kernel for dom0 & domU. Inter-| Receive | Transmit face |bytes
2011 Feb 18
1
problem for add second bridge xenbr1
Dear I need create second bridge xenbr1 for separate traffic between my virtual machine , I following this step but show message that Link veth0 is missing, how I can create veth0 ? When I run script for create xenbr1 ./network-bridge netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 start Shwo this message Link veth0 is missing. This may be because you have reached the limit of the number of interfaces that the
2008 Feb 20
0
network-routing
Dear Xen-Users, I use Xen 3.1.0_15042 on my OpenSuSE-10.3-computer. Without starting the xen-kernel I can connect my second computer via my native computer to the internet. After starting the xen-kernel the xen-bridge came automatically up. How can I configure the xen-bridge or the xen-devices? I get routing problems: Feb 20 18:31:36 intel6550 kernel: martian source 217.237.149.142 from
2006 Nov 23
0
network issue, RHEL4, lack of peth0/peth1 device
Hi! I''m not new to Xen but I''m new to this list. I''m having a truely bizarre problem with Xen bridged networking at the moment. This is a new install, on RHEL4. The symptom is that any domU set up simply fails to talk to anything else. It''s there, and running, and it has an ethernet device, but there''s never any response. After digging through the
2006 Jan 20
3
domU Device eth0 does not seem to be present
I can''t find network device in domU. Debian domU shows Configuring network interfaces...SIOCSIFADDR: No such device eth0: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device and Fedora domU shows: eth0: unknown interface: No such device Dom0 is using Fedora with: kernel-xen-guest.i686 2.6.15-1.29_FC5 installed kernel-xen-hypervisor.i686
2007 May 13
6
no network for dom0
I installed Ubuntu Feisty successfully, then I configured the network (static IP) and things worked well. Then I installed Xen using "apt-get install ubuntu-xen-desktop". I could boot the xen kernel, and booted succesfully to dom0, however, there''s no network for dom0. According to network manager, I saw that Ubuntu recognizes now 4 unconfigured adapters (veth0, veth1, veth2,
2007 Jun 25
1
Ping dom0 <-> domU result in "Destination host unreachable"
Hi folks, I read quite some posts about "Destination host unreachable" problems before, but none could help me to solve my issue. So here we go: This is what I am using: SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 SP1 - Current with all updates Network configuration of my dom0: foobar:~ # ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd
2009 Jul 16
0
xen-3.0.3-80.el5_3.3 on RHEL 5.3 -- peth0 and xenbr0 don''t exist
Has anyone ran into this issue before? 2 physical nics: eth0 hooked up to 10.175.8.0/21 eth1 hooked up to 10.150.8.0/24 Ifconfig -a looks like this: [root@mgixen1 ~]# ifconfig -a eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:19:B9:F2:1B:C3 inet addr:10.175.8.158 Bcast:10.175.15.255 Mask:255.255.248.0 inet6 addr: fe80::219:b9ff:fef2:1bc3/64 Scope:Link UP
2007 Jul 22
0
Network configuration after upgrade
Hello, A bit of history ================ 1) I''ve got a normal 2.6.20 x64 Fedora 6 Linux server running several things 2) I''ve downloaded and installed the XenSource Administrator Console for Windows 3) I''ve added 2.6.20-1.2962.fc6xen kernel, xen and vnc packages on my Linux server 4) I rebooted the Linux server, and started xend as per user guide Configuration
2007 Aug 17
6
Gutsy Xen 3.1 2.6.22-9-xen network-bridge problem
Hi, I have a strange problem with my networking setup. I read all forums around the world where people had similar problems, but couldn''t find a solution. I have an Attansic L1 gigeth chip on my mainboard. This chip works OK in stock Ubuntu Gutsy (development) 2.6.22-9-generic kernel. When I boot into Xen, and after the bridge is created, the network stops working. Some info: - If I
2006 Aug 30
0
ping out of domU OK ping in to domU not OK
I''ve setup Xen 3.0.2-2 (binary install) on Ubuntu 6.06, got my domUs up and running, got them connected to the Internet but I can''t even ping to any of these VMs. Now I''m not linux/xen genious but could the problem be that xen-br0 doesn''t have an IPv4 address? (it''s got an IPv6 address) Since I don''t use IPv6 on my network this seems a
2009 May 11
1
vif0.0: received packet with own address as source address
Hi all, Has anyone seen this before? I''m running a CentOS 5.3 with xen 3.0 and the server has been running fine for a long time. In fact, it was up for 186 days before I had to reboot after the "network died", and I couldn''t fix it. The server has multiple domU''s on it, which all still works when the host node (dom0)''s network dies with these
2008 Feb 28
1
Networking problems with fresh install
I just did a fresh install of centos 5.0 from cd, followed by yum update which installed 399 packages. No failures or errors that I can see. I have three nics in the box, but am only setting up one at the moment. The box can ping others in my network, but if I try ssh, telnet, ftp, etc I get this: [root at cm network-scripts]# ftp watchdog ftp: connect: No route to host ftp> [root at cm
2008 Apr 14
1
Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working.
Hi, I got this error when starting a domU on Centos 5.1 i386, Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working. Why is this happening ? I should restart the machine to see if this still happends after a fresh network bridge. But it's somehow a production server, I would like not to restart it, if possible. No domU is currently running. I could start domUs a week ago.
2006 Sep 05
0
Problem with network-bridge script and veth0
Hello, Since my last update of xen, I am having problems with bridges and xen. When I want to start a bridge on the dom0 (to run a domU in a different vlan than the default) I run /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge start netdev=eth0.302 bridge=xen-br302 antispoof=no where eth0.302 is an interface associated with my vlan 302 (it tags with this vlan identifier). The problem I have is that it
2006 Jun 20
9
no eth0 on guest
Hi, I''ve setup a box with xen. For the root machine, it''s ok, it see the network card: alian@yoda:~> /sbin/lspci ... 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8053 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 19) alian@yoda:~> lsmod .... sk98lin 208748 1 alian@yoda:~> /sbin/ifconfig eth0 Lien encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:F2:39:D4:DF
2009 Aug 05
2
bridge vs macvlan performance (was: some veth related issues)
Ben Greear wrote: > Well, it seems we could and should fix veth to work, but it will have > to do equivalent work of copying an skb most likely, so either way > you'll probably get a big performance hit. Using the same pktgen script (i.e with clone=0) I see that a veth-->bridge-->veth configuration gives about 400K PPS forwarding performance where
2009 Aug 05
2
bridge vs macvlan performance (was: some veth related issues)
Ben Greear wrote: > Well, it seems we could and should fix veth to work, but it will have > to do equivalent work of copying an skb most likely, so either way > you'll probably get a big performance hit. Using the same pktgen script (i.e with clone=0) I see that a veth-->bridge-->veth configuration gives about 400K PPS forwarding performance where