Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "Mongrel Now Recommended Setup?"
2006 Feb 23
5
Help with SCGI please :(
Hi,
While learning Ruby and Rails, I decided I just as well learn Linux
along the way... It''s been fun, but I''m stuck at one of those
exasperating moments... I hope someone can help me :)
I installed Ruby 1.8.4 on Fedora Core 4, then Rails, then lighty, and
then SCGI.
I used yum to install lighty... and it already comes with mod_scgi.
I created my first application in
2006 Apr 03
12
scgi?? do i need it for ruby?
This might be obvious to everyone but it is something that i haven''t
been able to find an answer to. Do I need to have either
scgi/fastcgi/cgi running on either lighttpd/apache for ruby scripts to
work? If yes, why? I have installed the scgi server and i can get the
service to run, i have also installed the following mod_fastcgi/2.4.2
mod_ruby/1.2.4 Ruby/1.8.2(2004-12-25) mod_scgi,
2006 Jun 28
5
Production deployment
Gang-
We are getting ready to launch our ROR application; the last item
remaining is the deployment platform. For testing, we had used Apache +
MOD_FastCGI. I am not that impressed with it; sometimes it has strange
effects. For example, when we start the application, for about 5 minutes
or so, the app is very unstable and it gets better over time.
My questions is .. should I go with (1)
2005 Dec 28
11
some notes about rails, apache, fastcgi and windows
hello.
i''d like to share some feelings of mine after a couple of *weeks*
intermittent attempts to have rails applications working on windows
(XP) with fastcgi performances under apache (2.0).
i''d say the software stack i''m using now will be fairly common as more
and more new rails developers will join the bandwagon.
what is stunning me is the fact that, even if
2006 Apr 15
9
Mongrel in Production ?
Hi Everyone,
I was setting up Lighty+Fcgi on our server for last *couple* ( read
zillion ) of hours. I had posted my problems in my previous email. But
all in vain..
So, for time being, I switched to Mongrel. And the performance seemed
quite good. This is the first time ever I''m using mongrel ( Awesome
stuff ZedShaw..Thanks! ). I''m wondering if there are many people
around
2006 Mar 29
13
Rails on Mongrel
Hi,
After following advice from you good folks, I gave mongrel a try in a
cluster design based on the example on the Mongrel website - and it
worked right out of the box which is great - and it''s very fast :)
I have got a bit stuck though. I have two MS Word files in
/public/files/. I can pull back these files no problem but it isn''t
sending a mimetype.
I think I have two
2006 Jun 07
10
RoR with Apache2 - performance?
How is the performance running RoR with Apache2 compared to running it
with PHP?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2006 Jun 26
4
Missing Content-Length header with lighttpd
We have our rails application running using lighttpd and everything
seems fine with Firefox, but when the client is Explorer some media
doesn''t get transferred from the server correctly. With Webrick,
Content-Length is set when a request is made for an mp3 file. Using
Firefox with lighttpd, Transfer-Encoding is set to chunked, so the
Content-Length field isn''t required.
2006 Mar 07
4
Lighty + Mongrel?
On httpd I use ProxyPass and ProxyPassReverse to forward requests to
webrick and mongrel. How can I do this same thing using Lighty and
Mongrel?
Thanks,
Joe
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2006 Aug 16
18
mongrel lighttpd and ssl
I am wanting to one run instance of lighttpd, many many instances of
mongrel. I also need ssl but only for one of my sites. I understand that
Mongrel does not play with SSL so I am forced to use Lighttpd. I think that
lighttpd only handles ssl or non-ssl on any given instance. Is there a way
for me to accomplish my goal of one lighttpd with multiple mongrels and the
occasional ssl connection?
--
2006 Mar 31
6
Lighty+Mongrel: More than one connection per client?
I have an action which requests another URL from the same site (for
testing purposes), but it keeps timing out. If I use an off-site URL,
the action works fine. I also notice that I''m only able to request one
page at a time from my server - the rest just spin until the previous
requests complete. Is this some setting in Lighty, Mongrel, or my
browser (Firefox - I played around with
2006 Apr 20
21
Can someone please explain Lighttpd + Mongrel + Rails.
I know that Mongrel is a web server that hosts rails applications. But
i don''t understand what part Lighttpd (or Apache) has in the setup. I
know that you can use Mongrel on its own. What does Lighttpd improve
on?
Thanks,
Chris
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2006 Jun 26
1
Dispatch.fcgi h-e-double hockey sticks...
Hello Everyone ~
Last week I started having a dispatch.fcgi process go out of control on my
Linux server. If I don''t catch it the process will eat my RAM, and devour
my swap file until the machine becomes non-responsive. I am running
Lighttpd and have not had any issues until lately.
The logs are not telling me anything useful, and as a quick fix I am running
the site using Mongrel,
2006 Feb 25
6
[OT-ish] Rails, Mongrel and apache
This is kind of off topic. I want to put my fancy rails app (myapp) as
a subdirectory on my os x server. so my osx server works fine right now
as www.mydomain.com. How do I tell apache (1.3 i think) to proxy web
requests for a subdirectory /myapp to localhost:3000 where I have
mongrel running (Jed, you rock)?
I googled, but I don''t know the right words to use, so I''m not
2006 Jan 31
3
Random 502 Bad Gateway
I have moved my project to a dedicated server and I am getting a very
annoying behaviour.
I am able to view the site just fine when using the ip.
The name is properly resolved on my computer, however I am getting
"Bad Gateway The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream
server."
This is simply random. The site works for several minutes, then i get this
message for some
2006 Mar 29
42
Production environment for Rails on Win32, anyone interested for a binary release?
Hi all, as part of adopting Rails in my company I had to go through
the hassle of setting up a Rails production environment on Win32
system since we mostly use MS SQL as our database back end and also
because we mostly dealing with customers who become green-blue-purple
as soon as you mention Unix/Linux and run for the door.
I also need to mention that most of our web applications are internal
and
2006 Jul 24
22
which webserver to use in production?
Apologies in advance if this ignites a war of comflicting opinions....
I''m a few days away from going live with my first RoR application. It
is completely database centric and each user will have his own queries
so cacheing will not really help.
I have a dedicated linux server being built by my hosting provider and I
need to tell them which webserver to use. The databse is MySQL
2006 May 11
6
Howtos: Deploying Rails on Windows servers
After a lot of work (and much promising) I have written instructions
on various methods to deploy Rails applications in a Windows
environment. For those of you who are not stuck with Windows, this
won''t matter too much to you, but I think this is really useful for
those in Windows shops.
Topics covered:
* Serving Multiple Rails Applications on Windows with Apache and
Mongrel
* Integrate
2006 May 11
5
Recommendations for Apache 2 with mod_fcgid
Hi,
Have been pulling out my hair for the last few days wondering what I''m
going to deploy my site onto.
I currently have FreeBSD 4.7, Apache 1.3.3, PHP 4 and MySQL 4 running a
year-old PHP site. Dated stuff I know!
The new version of the site will be entirely Ruby on Rails, and I am
wondering what order I should be doing things in terms of upgrades and
installation. I want to be
2006 Jan 26
2
Run fastcgi in Apache 1.3, or proxy through lighttpd?
I''m working with a guy who has Apache 1.3 installed on his server, and
it''s not an option to simply use lighttpd for a Rails application I''m
helping him with. I''ve seen that Apache 2 apparently is crappy when
it comes to fastcgi, but 1.3 isn''t so bad. I can then either just run
my app straight in Apache, or I could proxy it through to lighttpd.
Which