similar to: ifup fails on CentOS 4

As the issue concerns both the -user (configuration) and -devel (OOPS), I''m sending this message to both lists. Some time ago I complained about two problems: - VLANs are not working on machines with 100 Mbit cards - I get a kernel Oops (sometimes panic) when I try to use bonding and VLANs with Xen The root of the issue is the same in both cases: VLAN interfaces must *not* be

As the issue concerns both the -user (configuration) and -devel (OOPS), I''m sending this message to both lists. Some time ago I complained about two problems: - VLANs are not working on machines with 100 Mbit cards - I get a kernel Oops (sometimes panic) when I try to use bonding and VLANs with Xen The root of the issue is the same in both cases: VLAN interfaces must *not* be

Hi Guys, I want to create multiple virtual interfaces on a system running linux 2.6. The main requirment being, to assign unique MAC address fo each of the virtual interfaces. I need to know, if this is possible and will really appriciate if someone can provide me pointer in this direction. Thanks a lot. R. Singh _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list

Hello, I'm following instructions in http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.LVS-DR.html#route_on_non_ip_interface to allow my xen guest real hosts to serve virtual IP's behind LVS without having to allocate real public IP addresses for each such xen guest. I have eth1 connected via a "back-end" switch to the eth1/xenbr1 of the xen host and the other physical

Can''t get proxy arp with arp -s <IPaddr> <MACaddr> pub to work with a 2.4 kernel. I see some evidence in the archive that this was broken in the 2.0.x timeframe and never fixed. Anyone know for sure if it''s broken or working ? (I''m attempting to route a few addresses into a routed network, from the ethernet side of a DSL router that has a /29 public

Setting up bonding in active-backup mode 1 (using ARP monitoring) on a server, it looked OK, but pulling the active link cable didn't actually work, it didn't fail over. Eventually with manual playing around with modprobe, ifconfig, ifenslave, etc., a solution was stumbled upon: enslave the eth1 device before eth0, and all is good. Why this should matter is a puzzle - I could not find

Hello all, I'm having unusual difficulty configuring teaming with Centos 4.2. The 2 NIC's are Broadcom. The HW is HP DL360 and there is no teaming driver for RHEL4 since it comes with package (says HP). Since there is no teaming driver from centos (as far as I know), I tried the Broadcom Driver, configured the team file, but the team just wont come up. A Virtual Interface should be up

Hi all I have a SuSE 9.3 domU. It has a eth0 interface, corresponding to some vif interface in the dom0. Running ifup eth0 doesn''t seem to work. This means I don''t get any network. It seems that /sbin/ifup relies upon /sbin/getcfg but getcfg does not seem to find the right configuration for the eth0 device. A attached a patch below with a work around for this.

Is there a little setup display right on the box? Just asking because I have seen that on some boxes. Cheers, Boris. On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 12:15 AM, Keith Keller < kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote: > On 2016-09-17, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: > > > > Okay if it requires DHCP this might be out, I'm currently out of town > >

Hello all, I need a virtual firewall/router solution. I''m thinking of a netscreen 1000 but I want to know if it can be done in Linux. Here is my idea: 1 Linux box 2 GigE interfaces 1 interface setup with a public IP address ($PUBIP) 1 interface setup with 802.1q VLAN trunking with 100 vlans assigned ($VLAN1-$VLAN100) a /25 subnet routed to $PUBIP from my core routers All $VLAN

I'm looking for a capability similar to Debian/Ubuntu's pre/post up/down network commands capability. The problem: we've got a colo in which hosts talk directly to the hosting provider's router (through a bridging firewall) and hence our hosts MAC addresses are cached by the router. We should be able to solve this by pinging the router directly when bringing up the interface,

Hi, I was hoping someone on this forums could help me out with a problem I was facing with Xen. When I compiled the kernel for Xen-3.1.3 using "make world"(I know this is an old version but I need to use it for some compatibility issues), the kernel was missing the Xen netloop module. There was no /kernel/drivers/xen/netback/netloop.ko in the newly compiled kernel. I think we would

Is anyone using user sets? I''m considering dropping support for them in 2.0 in favor of just listing individual user/groups in the rules file. Thanks, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

I''ve had a shorewall firewall protecting my home network for almost 3 years now which is currently on a RedHat 7.3 box and I''m running version 1.4.7 I''m replacing this box with a newer one and have set it up with Gentoo linux and the 2.6.9-r9 kernel and installed Gentoo''s distro of shorewall which is version 2.0.7. I have also compiled the needed netfilter

Hi, I want to add 2 vlans by the following steps: 1. add the vlan interfaces: vconfig add eth0 100 --vlan100 vconfig add eth0 101 --vlan101 2. modify the network-bridge script by the websit, http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenNetworking#head-04ebcc1760dbc4678e83b116afa310dc0612dc39 Comment each time ifup or ifdown commands are executed.The reason is that ifdown ends with

With the current talk on bonding, I have a few questions of my own. I'm setting up a KVM host with CentOS 6.3 x86_64 on which I'd like to attach the VMs to a bonded interface. My target setup is one where two GigE NICs are bonded and then the KVM bridge interface is attached to the bonded interface. Initially I tried to use the balance-alb mode (mode6), but had little luck (receiving

All I have the following setup: 4 VLAN interfaces enslaved in a bridge interface. All VLAN interfaces don't have IP address. The bridge interface has 192.168.1.1/24. Now, when I try to ping from one of the VLAN interfaces, through a host connected to a VLAN switch, while dumping the traffic, the following happens: - Host sends ARP who-has broadcast to the VLAN interface (tagged correctly,

Thank you everyone. OK, the mystery deepens, I guess. The machine does need to support several VLAN's, it is currently on a trunkport (8021q encapsulated), it made it into the ARP table - which I specifically tested for by physically unplugging the table, clearing the ARP table and plugging it back in. The ARP table currently looks like this: hq#show arp Protocol Address Age (min)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 A few months back, I tried to use the network scripts to provision an IPv6 range like can be done with IPv4. I was using CentOS 5.2 at the time and was informed that 5.2 was broken in this regard. I have upgraded to CentOS 5.3 now and I am trying to get IPv6 to provision an entire range of IPs, but I am still getting the old behavior and no IPs are

Hi, I am trying to find out the IP address of the KVM guest virtual machine. #virsh dumpxml newsoftlinedrupalpoc | grep "mac address" | awk -F\' '{ print $2}' 52:54:00:2c:7e:ff [root@baseserver1 ~]# arp -an | grep 52:54:00:2c:7e:ff [root@baseserver1 ~]# virsh domifaddr newsoftlinedrupalpoc Name MAC address Protocol Address