similar to: Native VLAN and bridging

Hi, I want to add 2 vlans by the following steps: 1. add the vlan interfaces: vconfig add eth0 100 --vlan100 vconfig add eth0 101 --vlan101 2. modify the network-bridge script by the websit, http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenNetworking#head-04ebcc1760dbc4678e83b116afa310dc0612dc39 Comment each time ifup or ifdown commands are executed.The reason is that ifdown ends with

Hi Rahul, If you're certain that your problem isn't as Stephen suggested, you might want to have a look at this: --- (From http://ebtables.sourceforge.net/brnf-faq.html <http://ebtables.sourceforge.net/brnf-faq.html> ) How do I let vlan-tagged traffic go through a vlan bridge port and the other traffic through a non-vlan bridge port? Suppose eth0 and eth0.15 are ports of br0.

Hello. I''m running linux box with Slackware 9.1 and compiled kernel 2.4.31 with "yes" to VLANs and "yes" to all QoS. On this box i have more ethernet interfaces: eth0 eth1 eth2 and so as more vlan interfaces: eth0.100 eth1.3 eth1.4 This is entrace(uplink) router to our whole network and my goal is to shape users on this machine. I want for this purpose use HTB so

I figured I should post this because before I went to do it I searched the web for caveats etc and didn''t really find much. So anyway, I set up bonding + vlan for a project. Computer is dell powerdge 350 with 2 intel 82559 10/100 nic running stock 2.4.20. I tried both the eepro100 and the e100 drivers for the nics, both work 802.1q and bonding are modules. Switch is cisco 2924xl-en

Package: src:xen-api Severity: wishlist I've tried to configure VLAN using XCP + openvswitch using Wheezy, though it's still not fully working, I think VLAN configuration on dom0 can be better documented. It's fair easy to configure VLAN in Debian. First you need to ensure that your physical switch is in trunk mode, which means it will pass all kinds of VLAN tagged network flow, and

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have a machine running 2.6.18-rc3 with a bridge config that looks like this: cr1:~# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces vlan100 36b0.0007e90f40c1 yes eth0.100 eth2.100 vlan101 5dc0.0007e90f40c1 yes

Hi I''m testing around with xen 3.0 snapshot from last week. And i''m now having a problem with a xenbr which is based on a vlan if (dot1q). this is all in dom0 os: debian testing network: tg3 I can start the bridge based on my normal physical eth0 which is working without any problems. My clan without bridge is also working. I can start the bridge based on a vlan if with help

So, I'm setting up my first bridge, and I'm running into an interesting issue. I have a 4 port NIC (formerly 4 seperate /29 and /28 LANs) and an onboard NIC (to my ISP). I've setup the bridge using the script included at the bottom of this email (modified from Gentoo for Aurora). When the WET11 (the WET11 is a simple ethernet to wireless bridge) is unplugged, the bridge works

I think it should be sufficient to do as following: - create and test the vlans as normal (i think you already did this) - try to create the bridge as follows (for the first try without starting xend): # network-bridge start netdev=vlan100 bridge=xenbr0 at least this was working on my debian testing installation but i have a problem now with incorrect tcp checksums in dom0 or domU. See my

<I apologize if this arrives twice... I sent it first from an non-subscribed address, don't know if that'll get to the list or not --JJ> Hi folks, I have an implementation question regarding bridging on a linux box between a catalyst trunk port and a cisco 26something w/802.1q subinterfaces. So right now, there's no vlan trunking going on on the link my bridging firewall sits

Cisco phones act a as a switch. If you do not use the CDP protocol to "tell" the phone it needs to be in a special VLAN (802.1q) then it will just use the access port settings on the switch, and, also allow the PC connected to the 2nd Ethernet port to have access to the network. However, if you have an all cisco powered network, with all cisco phones, I could advise you to use the CDP

I've searched around but haven't found a definitive answer yet, is it possible to kickstart from a tagged VLAN? I found this bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431915 But I can't find out how far the vlan support goes. I haven't found anything about it in any kickstart docs. I have two tagged vlans: Vlan 100 - server subnet Vlan 101 - backup subnet From

I am wanting to verify that I am properly using the MASQ for a series of hosts. I have 2 providers, and my providers file has the contents: #NAME NUMBER MARK DUPLICATE INTERFACE GATEWAY OPTIONS COPY l3 1 100 main eth0.100 1.18.139.1 track,loose,fallback eth1 ws 2 200 main eth0.101 1.155.136.193

On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 11:42 -0600, Jordan Novak wrote: > Does anyone have a way to do wake calls? > > > > Jordan Novak > > Communications Technician > > Logistics Health Inc. You could use cron and /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing scripts to dial numbers, etc... > Can you elaborate, I am fairly new to Linux and a phone guy to boot. I am looking for a way for the

As the issue concerns both the -user (configuration) and -devel (OOPS), I''m sending this message to both lists. Some time ago I complained about two problems: - VLANs are not working on machines with 100 Mbit cards - I get a kernel Oops (sometimes panic) when I try to use bonding and VLANs with Xen The root of the issue is the same in both cases: VLAN interfaces must *not* be

As the issue concerns both the -user (configuration) and -devel (OOPS), I''m sending this message to both lists. Some time ago I complained about two problems: - VLANs are not working on machines with 100 Mbit cards - I get a kernel Oops (sometimes panic) when I try to use bonding and VLANs with Xen The root of the issue is the same in both cases: VLAN interfaces must *not* be

Hello, I''m trying to setup an 8 port wan configuration (pptp+pppoe) with one vlan trunk. My internal networks are : LAN(eth9): 10.0.0.0/16 VLAN10(eth9) 10.10.0.0/24 VLAN20(eth9) 10.20.0.0/24 VLAN30(eth9) 10.30.0.0/24 VLAN100(eth9) 10.100.0.0/24 I would like to post my configuration here since i don''t success to do the following: 1. Communicate between VLANxx to LAN

Hi Boris, what I'd like to know is the actual VLAN configuration of the switch port (link-type and tagged and untagged VLANs). When I look at the switchport coniguration here I get (among other things): ... Port link-type: trunk Tagged VLAN ID : 8, 1624 Untagged VLAN ID : 10 ... Here is my suspicion: Your ports have an access link-type with an untagged VLAN ID of 48. That would

Hello, I''m receiving this error while restarting/starting Shorewall : Processing /etc/shorewall/init ... WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan20 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan10 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan30 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan50 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan100 My route -n

Thanks for the reply. You are quite right about the routing, and i've advanced to the bridging part. But it will not work. I've finaly gotten access to the switch it's connected to and from the logs i've got this output: Jan 26 16:49:56: %SPANTREE-2-RECV_PVID_ERR: Received BPDU with inconsistent peer vlan id 4 on GigabitEthernet0/1 VLAN40. Jan 26 16:49:56: