similar to: Re: loop devices

Hello all, I have a Xen server with 6 network interfaces, I want a bridge on all of them. I use a personal network script like this : #!/bin/bash dir=$(dirname "$0") "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=eth0 bridge=xenbr0 "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 "$dir/network-bridge" "$@"

Hi Group ... havin'' read whatever I could "google" on this topic, I didn`t find any solution: openSuSE 10.2 (out of the box), xenkernel, running on HP Proliant DL360G5 (dual internal networking, plus additional 4-port adapter) gives me eth0 - eth5, but only peth0 - peth3 (as well as vif0 - vif3 and consequentely xenbr0 - xenbr3). I increased the number of loopback-devices

Hi, with reference to RH BZ#567540 [0], this patch makes the netloop module permanent (like netback is currently). It reverts parts of xen-unstable c/s 9019:271cb04a4f2b [1] [2] (though that has a typo: "__init clean_loopback", so it was probably changed later too). The patch fixes the problem of "rmmod netloop" hanging, resulting in blocked tasks and inability to shut down

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0+hg11292-2 Severity: normal After a recent etch upgrade (2.6.17, xen-3.0.2) I was unable to "xm create" until I "modprobe netloop nloopbacks=10" Error was network-bridge couln't create vif interface (backend not found). brctl addbr ... fails because of no free netloop device. passing more nloopbacks device to the module fixed the

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0+hg11624-2 Severity: normal I'm running etch with xen 3.0.3 with a hand-compiled 2.6.18.1 kernel. The /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge fails to run, because it (effectively) does this: set -e modprobe netloop > /dev/null 2>&1 As I do not have a netloop module (where is it supposed to come from ? The 2.6.18.1 xen-patched kernel doesn't

Hello, I''m new to Xen (and this mailing-list) and facing some problems with the network. I''m stuck and don''t know how to continue. And Google isn''t very helpful either... My setup: - Ubuntu 7.10 for dom0 and Debian 4.0 for all domU - 4 physical NIC (DHCP from my ISP, internal LAN, DMZ & WLAN) - 1 Dom as firewall/router - 1 domU with internal services

Hi, I try to get networking running with xen 3.2, but it seems I fail miserably. I am on sles10sp1, with xen 3.2.0, and kernel rpm''s installed from SP2. I configured in /etc/sysconfig/network the NETWORK_LIST: NETWORK_LIST="bridge,0,default,00:DE:AD:BE:EF,192.168.8.13/24,dhcp-off" but an ifconfig xenbr0 still shows the mac address of peth0 fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff. Initially, I

Hello all, I''m using Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (with RH Virtualization) and a Dell Poweredge 2950 with 10 NICs. My virtual operating systems are all RHEL4, and I''ve installed 4 instances. I''m trying to set up the virtual operating systems so that the physical NICs are allocated to certain operating systems. Using the following tutorial:

Hello, I have got something strange when I done a /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge status : 201: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,10000> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether 00:15:17:8d:cb:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff And when I done a /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge I have got this : Link veth0 1 is missing. This may be because you have reached the limit of the number of

Hi list, since release 5.3 all kernels ignore options netloop nloopbacks=<n> within /etc/modprobe.conf If <n> is smaller than four there are always four vifs created. If <n> is bigger than four the appropriate number of vifs are created. Is this expected/new/feature/bug? Henry

Hi All, We have a single Centos 5.11 server running a xen hypervisor that went down hard after an extended power outage this weekend. I'm mostly familiar for KVM as that is the majority of what our guests run under and have tried getting up to speed on xen bridging to no avail. The problem is that after the xen server spun back up, the previously defined xen bridges were lost. I've

Hello, Since my last update of xen, I am having problems with bridges and xen. When I want to start a bridge on the dom0 (to run a domU in a different vlan than the default) I run /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge start netdev=eth0.302 bridge=xen-br302 antispoof=no where eth0.302 is an interface associated with my vlan 302 (it tags with this vlan identifier). The problem I have is that it

Dear I need create second bridge xenbr1 for separate traffic between my virtual machine , I following this step but show message that Link veth0 is missing, how I can create veth0 ? When I run script for create xenbr1 ./network-bridge netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 start Shwo this message Link veth0 is missing. This may be because you have reached the limit of the number of interfaces that the

I have a strange problem with VLANs with Xen 3.0.4. I signalled it on Xen-users list, but found no definitive solution to it. I configure VLANs so that they are available in dom0; domUs don''t know that they use VLANs. I use a stock "network-bridge" comming from Xen for setting up networking: #!/bin/bash dir=$(dirname "$0") "$dir/network-bridge"

I have a 2.6.12(ubuntu-patchset), kernel recompiled with this routing options: [*] IP: advanced router [*] IP: policy routing [*] IP: equal cost multipath Load balancing is working great, but i have problems whits long term tcp flows (like msn-messenger or vpns or any other type of long term ip based conection). I assume this is because after a period of time, the per-host

Hi to the ML. I''m new to VLAN configuration, and combining it to XEN is a bit difficult. I want to use VLAN because it''s possible to "arping" from a domU to an other, and VLAN looks like; the only solution to prevent that. May be I''m wrong if someone got a solution, I may be interrested. I''ve also tryed ebtables, but nothing to prevent arp

Hi, i have a question if linux is able to do the same thing that commercial wan simulators do (which cost 7000 $ or more). Basicly i want to use the following setup. Linux Router Machine 192.168.0.1 192.168.1.1 Eth0 192.168.10.1 Eth5 192.168.2.1 Eth1 192.168.100.1 WEB Server. 192.168.3.1 Eth2

The FAQ says to use loopback.nloopbacks to limit the number of vif''s and veth''s that show up in dom0. This no longer appears to work. Has this been remove with no replacement or has this just changed and the FAQ hasn''t kept up? -- Jason The place where you made your stand never mattered, only that you were there... and still on your feet

As the issue concerns both the -user (configuration) and -devel (OOPS), I''m sending this message to both lists. Some time ago I complained about two problems: - VLANs are not working on machines with 100 Mbit cards - I get a kernel Oops (sometimes panic) when I try to use bonding and VLANs with Xen The root of the issue is the same in both cases: VLAN interfaces must *not* be

As the issue concerns both the -user (configuration) and -devel (OOPS), I''m sending this message to both lists. Some time ago I complained about two problems: - VLANs are not working on machines with 100 Mbit cards - I get a kernel Oops (sometimes panic) when I try to use bonding and VLANs with Xen The root of the issue is the same in both cases: VLAN interfaces must *not* be