similar to: Weird DNAT + passive FTP bug

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [LARTC] DNAT rule for vsftp (PASSIVE FTP) Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:17:42 +0530 From: Mohan Sundaram <smohan@vsnl.com> Reply-To: smohan@vsnl.com To: Indunil Jayasooriya <indunil75@gmail.com> References: <7ed6b0aa0710042251u6442fb85ma74e46aa9d3f81f9@mail.gmail.com> Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to run

Grant Taylor wrote: > I''ll have to double check some things to make sure that you don''t need > to do any thing special other than just allow the initial connection and > rely on the FTP connection tracking helper to handle all other connections. > > I''ve never run an FTP server behind a NAT, but I''ve never had a problem > with the FTP

Hi all, I want to run vsftp behind a firewall.(i.e DMZ zone) . It is runnig as passive ftp. the theroy behind passive ftp is , - FTP server's port 21 from anywhere ( Client initiates connection) - FTP server's port 21 to ports > 1024 (Server responds to client's control port) - FTP server's ports > 1024 from anywhere (Client initiates data connection to

Hi all, I want to run vsftp behind a firewall.(i.e DMZ zone) . It is runnig as passive ftp. the theroy behind passive ftp is , - FTP server''s port 21 from anywhere (Client initiates connection) - FTP server''s port 21 to ports > 1024 (Server responds to client''s control port) - FTP server''s ports > 1024 from anywhere (Client initiates data

The Shorewall team is pleased to announce the availability of Shorewall 4.5.7. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. P R O B L E M S C O R R E C T E D I N T H I S R E L E A S E ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) This release includes the defect repair from Shorewall 4.5.6.2. 2) The command

Hi all! I am a long time lurker, but have not posted until now. My old trusted firewall machine broke a couple of weeks ago and I replaced it with a XEN domU that is using DNAT and has two interfaces. The firewall domU and the FTP server domU are both guests on the same dom0. All three machines are running Debian/etch (stable) and Shorewall has version 3.2.6. I can''t get FTP to work

On 04/11/2017 04:16 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: > Hi, I would like to see this addressed. > Is there a firewalld solution to this issue? Yes: # Disable connection tracking for UDP DNS traffic # https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01183/0/Linux-connection-tracking-and-DNS.html firewall-cmd --permanent --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter INPUT 0 -m conntrack --ctstate UNTRACKED -j ACCEPT firewall-cmd

This patch adds an ACM hook into the network scripts (/etc/xen/scripts). It adds iptables rules that enforce mandatory access control on network packets exchanged between virtual interfaces. If ACM is active, this patch sets the default FORWARD policy in Dom0 to DROP and adds iptables ACCEPT rules between vifs that belong to domains that are permitted to share (determined by using the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=882 Summary: The conntrack-tools archive contains some leftovers from a patch run Product: conntrack-tools Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: conntrack-daemon

Hello everybody, I have an odd problem with iptables using a Xen bridge setup. I don''t know if it would be better to post to netfilter Mailing-List. But I hope someone here know how to solve it. If it''s OT here, please let me know. I''ll try to do a little bit ASCII-Graphics to explain the topo better: _________ ________

Chris Lattner-2 wrote: > > > On Feb 11, 2009, at 4:07 AM, Alex wrote: > >> In my hardware there are two special registers cannot be copied but >> can only be assigned and referenced (read) in the other instruction. >> They are allocatable also. >> >> br i1 %if_cond, label %then, label %else >> then: >> %x1 = fptosi float %y1 to i32

Hi. Contents: 1) Introduction 2) 2 Questions * Introduction: I used this HOWTO to use multiple providers. http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html The box is a load balancer, using the Linux Virtual Server. We have a problem with lost connections, and it seems you get issues when you combine this setup with DNAT [1]. The proposed solution [1] is to use these rules to mark

Hi! The Netfilter project proudly presents: conntrack-tools 1.4.6 The conntrack-tools are a set of tools targeted at system administrators. They are conntrack, the userspace command line interface, and conntrackd, the userspace daemon. The tool conntrack provides a full featured interface that is intended to replace the old /proc/net/ip_conntrack interface. Using conntrack, you can view

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1065 Bug ID: 1065 Summary: NOTRACK is not supported in nft Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

Hi, I''m using the same set of firewall rules of 2.0.x (sorry, I can''t remember the exact minor version) and put it to work with 2.0.9. And now I can''t do passive ftp (was working before). I see that my NEWNOTSYN is set to Yes, and the loc->net rule is blocking 1024:65535. But I believe with the ip_conntrack_ftp, the passive mode would be allowed, since

Hello I''ve setuped a bridge with iptables + layer + ipp2p + tc I don''t know how to shape passive ftp ? If I put rules on port 20, 21 or using layer 7 iptables accounting still empty ... When I done a tcpdump I can see that othe port than 20 or 21 are used ... Any Ideas of how I can achieve this ? Regards

Hi, I just wanted to share my script with the list. I have been trying to shape outbound passive and active ftp traffic without affecting inbound and lan transfers. I have tried to do this for a long time and it seems that I have finally figured it out. Feel free to comment on the below script if there is anything that can be improved. It seems to work flawlessly so far. #!/bin/bash

Hi, I am trying to use the following script to limit my passive ftp traffic to 35KBytes. Problem is, it kill''s the entire connection on that computer. The script is running on the same machine as the ftp server. I was hoping to limit the ftp traffic, and only the ftp traffic, leaving the computer. It seems to limit everything, i tried transfering a file with samba and the whole

I am trying to mark outbound passive ftp traffic with iptables and shape it to 35KBytes. I am using the following script on the computer that runs the ftp server. It is not working correctly, it seems to limit ALL traffic. Cant file share or anything. Anyone might know what is wrong? #!/bin/bash #shaping passive ftp traffic # mark the outbound passive ftp packets on ports 50000-51000

I am trying to control traffic in my server and a doubt came over me... My ftp server is set up in passive mode, so it will randomly choose a port to transfer data (in my case ports 50000-50100)... Is there a way of controlling this ftp traffic without marking packets? Thanks! Bye... msn: fredi_bieging@hotmail.com skype: fredibieging A mathematician is a machine for converting coffee into